Macrogenomic analysis of tolerance and degradation mechanisms of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathways and associated bacterial communities during endogenous partial denitrification
Baodan Jin, Ye Liu, Fukun Zhao, Yeyu Yan, Zhixuan Bai, Jingjing Du, Yuanqian Xu, Chuang Ma, Jiantao Ji
{"title":"Macrogenomic analysis of tolerance and degradation mechanisms of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in carbon and nitrogen metabolic pathways and associated bacterial communities during endogenous partial denitrification","authors":"Baodan Jin, Ye Liu, Fukun Zhao, Yeyu Yan, Zhixuan Bai, Jingjing Du, Yuanqian Xu, Chuang Ma, Jiantao Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effective production of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N through endogenous partial denitrification (EPD) provides a promising perspective for the broader adoption and application of anaerobic ammonia oxidation. However, the accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment may worsen the operational challenges of the EPD system. This study evaluated the resilience of the EPD system to the toxic impacts of phenanthrene (PHE) and anthracene (ANT) through macrogenomic analysis. A control group was maintained under identical conditions for comparison. The results revealed that PHE and ANT had a relatively minimal impact on NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N transformation and organic matter removal but significantly affected PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>-P removal and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N accumulation in the EPD process. The PHE system achieved a higher NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N accumulation, with a maximum NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N to NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N conversion ratio of 90.08%. In contrast, the ANT system exhibited higher efficiency in the PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>-P removal, achieving a peak removal rate of 74.94%. Macrogenomic analysis revealed that PAHs significantly enriched both denitrifying glycogen-accumulating organisms (including <em>Candidatus_Competibacter</em>) and denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (such as <em>Thauera, Candidatus_Contendobacter, and Candidatus_Accumulibacter</em>). This enrichment stabilized these organisms, facilitating NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N accumulation and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>-P removal. Metabolic pathway analysis indicated that PHE promoted the enrichment of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N reductase and inhibited NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N reductase activity. However, ANT stimulated oxidative phosphorylation and the phosphate cycle. Moreover, PAH metabolites enhanced the expression of key genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase and isocitrate dehydrogenase in the tricarboxylic acid cycle within the EPD process, leading to increase the synthesis and utilization of acetyl coenzyme-A. Notably, significant differences were observed between the effects of PHE and ANT on these metabolic processes. This study provides new methods for treating PAH-containing wastewater through the combination of EPD and anaerobic ammonia oxidation.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effective production of NO2−-N through endogenous partial denitrification (EPD) provides a promising perspective for the broader adoption and application of anaerobic ammonia oxidation. However, the accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment may worsen the operational challenges of the EPD system. This study evaluated the resilience of the EPD system to the toxic impacts of phenanthrene (PHE) and anthracene (ANT) through macrogenomic analysis. A control group was maintained under identical conditions for comparison. The results revealed that PHE and ANT had a relatively minimal impact on NO3−-N transformation and organic matter removal but significantly affected PO43−-P removal and NO2−-N accumulation in the EPD process. The PHE system achieved a higher NO2−-N accumulation, with a maximum NO3−-N to NO2−-N conversion ratio of 90.08%. In contrast, the ANT system exhibited higher efficiency in the PO43−-P removal, achieving a peak removal rate of 74.94%. Macrogenomic analysis revealed that PAHs significantly enriched both denitrifying glycogen-accumulating organisms (including Candidatus_Competibacter) and denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (such as Thauera, Candidatus_Contendobacter, and Candidatus_Accumulibacter). This enrichment stabilized these organisms, facilitating NO2−-N accumulation and PO43−-P removal. Metabolic pathway analysis indicated that PHE promoted the enrichment of NO3−-N reductase and inhibited NO2−-N reductase activity. However, ANT stimulated oxidative phosphorylation and the phosphate cycle. Moreover, PAH metabolites enhanced the expression of key genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase and isocitrate dehydrogenase in the tricarboxylic acid cycle within the EPD process, leading to increase the synthesis and utilization of acetyl coenzyme-A. Notably, significant differences were observed between the effects of PHE and ANT on these metabolic processes. This study provides new methods for treating PAH-containing wastewater through the combination of EPD and anaerobic ammonia oxidation.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.