Underpinnings of reservoir and techno-economic analysis for Himalayan and Son-Narmada-Tapti geothermal sites of India

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121630
{"title":"Underpinnings of reservoir and techno-economic analysis for Himalayan and Son-Narmada-Tapti geothermal sites of India","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The high capital cost and risks associated with the extraction process of geothermal energy are key factors in the project economics. This paper presents a comprehensive technoeconomic study based on reservoir heat and flow simulations along with the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for two geothermal sites (Himalayan and Son-Narmada-Tapti i.e. SONATA) in India.</div><div>Dual porosity reservoir simulation models were constructed and were used to obtain the cumulative and the dynamic thermal energy potentials of these sites. The simulation studies suggest that both sites are equally potent for geothermal energy extraction. Comparatively, the proven cumulative energy potentials for the Himalayan and SONATA sites are found to be 4.92–5.10 and 3.62–3.7 TW h, respectively, for the 30 years of production at a rate of 92 kg/s. This difference can be attributed mainly to higher temperatures and deeper sites at the Himalayan Province. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of various parameters, including porosity, permeability, fracture spacing, and thermal conductivity. The results suggest that porosity and permeability are the key enablers of efficient energy production. The economic feasibility study suggests that the LCOE costs are high for these sites ($148/MWh for the Himalayan and $137/MWh for the SONATA). These two sites have CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation potential in the range of 3.12 and 11.36 Megatons from a single doublet well configuration considering the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from conventional coal-fired thermal power plants. Overall, SONATA can be the better prospect considering the logistics and operational challenges along with reservoir heat potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124016987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high capital cost and risks associated with the extraction process of geothermal energy are key factors in the project economics. This paper presents a comprehensive technoeconomic study based on reservoir heat and flow simulations along with the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for two geothermal sites (Himalayan and Son-Narmada-Tapti i.e. SONATA) in India.
Dual porosity reservoir simulation models were constructed and were used to obtain the cumulative and the dynamic thermal energy potentials of these sites. The simulation studies suggest that both sites are equally potent for geothermal energy extraction. Comparatively, the proven cumulative energy potentials for the Himalayan and SONATA sites are found to be 4.92–5.10 and 3.62–3.7 TW h, respectively, for the 30 years of production at a rate of 92 kg/s. This difference can be attributed mainly to higher temperatures and deeper sites at the Himalayan Province. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of various parameters, including porosity, permeability, fracture spacing, and thermal conductivity. The results suggest that porosity and permeability are the key enablers of efficient energy production. The economic feasibility study suggests that the LCOE costs are high for these sites ($148/MWh for the Himalayan and $137/MWh for the SONATA). These two sites have CO2 mitigation potential in the range of 3.12 and 11.36 Megatons from a single doublet well configuration considering the CO2 emissions from conventional coal-fired thermal power plants. Overall, SONATA can be the better prospect considering the logistics and operational challenges along with reservoir heat potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度喜马拉雅山和松-纳尔马达-塔普提地热区的储层和技术经济分析基础
与地热能源开采过程相关的高资本成本和风险是影响项目经济性的关键因素。本文介绍了基于储层热量和流量模拟的综合技术经济研究,以及印度两个地热地点(喜马拉雅山和 Son-Narmada-Tapti 即 SONATA)的平准化能源成本 (LCOE)。模拟研究表明,这两个地点的地热能提取潜力相当。相比较而言,喜马拉雅和 SONATA 两个地点已探明的累积能量潜力分别为 4.92-5.10 和 3.62-3.7 太瓦时(以 92 千克/秒的速度生产 30 年)。造成这一差异的主要原因是喜马拉雅省的气温较高,产地较深。为评估孔隙度、渗透率、裂缝间距和导热率等各种参数的影响,进行了敏感性分析。结果表明,孔隙度和渗透率是高效能源生产的关键因素。经济可行性研究表明,这些地点的 LCOE 成本较高(喜马拉雅山为 148 美元/兆瓦时,SONATA 为 137 美元/兆瓦时)。考虑到传统燃煤火力发电厂的二氧化碳排放量,这两个地点的二氧化碳减排潜力分别为 3.12 兆吨和 11.36 兆吨。总体而言,考虑到物流和运营方面的挑战以及储层热潜力,SONATA 的前景更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of slot parameters for performance enhancement of slotted Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using Taguchi analysis Torrefied and pyrolyzed pellets and their environmental impact in household heating Underpinnings of reservoir and techno-economic analysis for Himalayan and Son-Narmada-Tapti geothermal sites of India Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of maleic anhydride hydrogenation to 1,4-butanediol through biomass gasification coupling with chemical looping hydrogen production Development, kinetic analysis, and economic feasibility of different Corn Stover-driven biorefineries to produce biohydrogen, bioethanol, and biomethane: A comparative analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1