Classification of grasses in the Mpumalanga coalfields region and assessment of their suitability to increase the pH of acid mine drainage, for potential use in passive acid mine drainage remediation systems

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107424
Janet Smith , Craig Sheridan , Lizelle van Dyk , Kevin G. Harding
{"title":"Classification of grasses in the Mpumalanga coalfields region and assessment of their suitability to increase the pH of acid mine drainage, for potential use in passive acid mine drainage remediation systems","authors":"Janet Smith ,&nbsp;Craig Sheridan ,&nbsp;Lizelle van Dyk ,&nbsp;Kevin G. Harding","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grass samples collected from various locations in the Mpumalanga coalfields region, (South Africa), were classified and characterised using various analytical techniques to determine their physical and chemical composition. The suitability of the grasses for use in acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation was evaluated by adding a defined portion of these grasses to both synthetically prepared and real AMD collected from an AMD received dam (RD) source in the Mpumalanga coalfields region, (South Africa). This was to establish whether the grass addition was able to achieve an increase in pH, and if the effect was more notable for a particular grass type. Results showed that grass addition to AMD resulted in an increase in pH (or decrease in the hydrogen ion (H<sup>+</sup>) concentration of synthetically prepared AMD. The addition of different grass types produced varying results, and the <em>Hyparrhenia hirta</em> (G12 and G13) and <em>Chrysopogon zizanioides</em> (G15) formally known as <em>Vetiveria zinanioldes</em> grass types produced a greater overall percentage decrease in H<sup>+</sup> concentration. Multiple grass additions sustained the overall high percentage decrease in H<sup>+</sup> concentration for the best-performing grass types and improved the overall percentage decrease in H<sup>+</sup> concentration of the more poorly performing <em>Eragrostis curvula</em> (G6), and <em>Hyparrhenia filipendula</em> (G5) grass types tested in synthetic AMD. The notable changes observed in cation and anion concentrations of the grass samples after contact with AMD would suggest that a cation-anion exchange reaction did occur. An exchange of the H<sup>+</sup> ions in the AMD and the inorganic cations (M<sup>+</sup>) associated with anions present in the grass, could be responsible for the increase in pH observed in synthetic AMD after grass addition. The addition of grass to the RD AMD did not achieve any significant or sustained decrease in H<sup>+</sup> concentration, which could be attributed to the more complex matrix and higher mineral acidity of the RD AMD which would require alternate experimental conditions to achieve a decrease in H<sup>+</sup> concentration. Variances in structural and physical composition between the different grass types were not consistent, and it was not possible to attribute the decrease in H<sup>+</sup> concentration in AMD to any compositional parameter. Using locally sourced lignocellulosic materials in passive remediation systems is vital to the successful design of a cost-effective and sustainable, remediation system. This work is important as it explores the suitability of grass types that are readily available from the immediate vicinity of the Mpumalanga coalfields, South Africa to increase the pH of contacted AMD at ambient temperature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grass samples collected from various locations in the Mpumalanga coalfields region, (South Africa), were classified and characterised using various analytical techniques to determine their physical and chemical composition. The suitability of the grasses for use in acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation was evaluated by adding a defined portion of these grasses to both synthetically prepared and real AMD collected from an AMD received dam (RD) source in the Mpumalanga coalfields region, (South Africa). This was to establish whether the grass addition was able to achieve an increase in pH, and if the effect was more notable for a particular grass type. Results showed that grass addition to AMD resulted in an increase in pH (or decrease in the hydrogen ion (H+) concentration of synthetically prepared AMD. The addition of different grass types produced varying results, and the Hyparrhenia hirta (G12 and G13) and Chrysopogon zizanioides (G15) formally known as Vetiveria zinanioldes grass types produced a greater overall percentage decrease in H+ concentration. Multiple grass additions sustained the overall high percentage decrease in H+ concentration for the best-performing grass types and improved the overall percentage decrease in H+ concentration of the more poorly performing Eragrostis curvula (G6), and Hyparrhenia filipendula (G5) grass types tested in synthetic AMD. The notable changes observed in cation and anion concentrations of the grass samples after contact with AMD would suggest that a cation-anion exchange reaction did occur. An exchange of the H+ ions in the AMD and the inorganic cations (M+) associated with anions present in the grass, could be responsible for the increase in pH observed in synthetic AMD after grass addition. The addition of grass to the RD AMD did not achieve any significant or sustained decrease in H+ concentration, which could be attributed to the more complex matrix and higher mineral acidity of the RD AMD which would require alternate experimental conditions to achieve a decrease in H+ concentration. Variances in structural and physical composition between the different grass types were not consistent, and it was not possible to attribute the decrease in H+ concentration in AMD to any compositional parameter. Using locally sourced lignocellulosic materials in passive remediation systems is vital to the successful design of a cost-effective and sustainable, remediation system. This work is important as it explores the suitability of grass types that are readily available from the immediate vicinity of the Mpumalanga coalfields, South Africa to increase the pH of contacted AMD at ambient temperature.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对姆普马兰加煤田地区的草类进行分类,并评估它们是否适合提高酸性矿井排水的 pH 值,以便在被动式酸性矿井排水修复系统中加以利用
使用各种分析技术对从姆普马兰加煤田地区(南非)不同地点采集的草样进行了分类和特征描述,以确定其物理和化学成分。在南非姆普马兰加(Mpumalanga)煤田地区的酸性矿井排水(AMD)接收坝(RD)源收集的合成和实际酸性矿井排水中加入一定量的这些草,对这些草是否适合用于酸性矿井排水(AMD)修复进行了评估。这样做的目的是为了确定添加草类是否能够提高 pH 值,以及特定草类的效果是否更加显著。结果表明,向 AMD 中添加青草可提高 pH 值(或降低合成 AMD 的氢离子 (H+) 浓度)。添加不同类型的草产生了不同的结果,Hyparrhenia hirta(G12 和 G13)和 Chrysopogon zizanioides(G15)(正式名称为 Vetiveria zinanioldes)草类型产生的 H+ 浓度总体降低百分比更高。在合成 AMD 中测试的 Eragrostis curvula(G6)和 Hyparrhenia filipendula(G5)草坪草中,添加多种草坪草后,表现最好的草坪草类型的 H+ 浓度总体下降百分比仍然很高,而表现较差的草坪草类型的 H+ 浓度总体下降百分比则有所提高。与 AMD 接触后,草样的阳离子和阴离子浓度发生了显著变化,这表明确实发生了阳离子-阴离子交换反应。反渗透脱硫剂中的 H+ 离子和与草中的阴离子相关的无机阳离子 (M+) 发生了交换,这可能是合成反渗透脱硫剂中加入草后 pH 值升高的原因。在 RD AMD 中添加青草并没有显著或持续降低 H+ 浓度,这可能是由于 RD AMD 的基质更复杂,矿物质酸度更高,需要在不同的实验条件下才能降低 H+ 浓度。不同草种之间的结构和物理成分差异并不一致,因此无法将 AMD 中 H+ 浓度的降低归因于任何成分参数。在被动修复系统中使用本地采购的木质纤维素材料对于成功设计具有成本效益和可持续性的修复系统至关重要。这项工作非常重要,因为它探讨了南非姆普马兰加煤田附近现成的草类是否适合在环境温度下提高接触式 AMD 的 pH 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Nature-based mitigation of shoreline erosion risks in tidal marshes created by managed realignment vs. sediment nourishment Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery 29 years of carbon sequestration in two constructed riverine wetlands Bio-degradable ‘reef bags’ used for rubble stabilisation and their impact on rubble stability, binding, coral recruitment and fish occupancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1