Phillip J Dijkhorst, Claire E E de Vries, Caroline B Terwee, Ignace M C Janssen, Ronald S L Liem, Bart A van Wagensveld, Johan Ottosson, Bruno Halpern, Stuart W Flint, Elisabeth F C van Rossum, Alend Saadi, Lisa West-Smith, Mary O'Kane, Jason C G Halford, Karen D Coulman, Salman Al-Sabah, John B Dixon, Wendy A Brown, Ximena Ramos Salas, Maarten M Hoogbergen, Sally Abbott, Alyssa J Budin, Jennifer F Holland, Lotte Poulsen, Richard Welbourn, Bernardo Rea Ruanova, John M Morton, Francois Pattou, Erman O Akpinar, Stephanie Sogg, Jacques M Himpens, Vanessa Osborne, Natasja Wijling, Laura Divine, Nadya Isack, Susie Birney, J M Bernadette Keenan, Joe Nadglowski, Jacqueline Bowman, Ken Clare, Riccardo Meloni, Sandra de Blaeij, Theodore K Kyle, Melanie Bahlke, Andrew Healing, Ian Patton, Valerie M Monpellier
{"title":"A Core set of patient-reported outcome measures to measure quality of life in obesity treatment research.","authors":"Phillip J Dijkhorst, Claire E E de Vries, Caroline B Terwee, Ignace M C Janssen, Ronald S L Liem, Bart A van Wagensveld, Johan Ottosson, Bruno Halpern, Stuart W Flint, Elisabeth F C van Rossum, Alend Saadi, Lisa West-Smith, Mary O'Kane, Jason C G Halford, Karen D Coulman, Salman Al-Sabah, John B Dixon, Wendy A Brown, Ximena Ramos Salas, Maarten M Hoogbergen, Sally Abbott, Alyssa J Budin, Jennifer F Holland, Lotte Poulsen, Richard Welbourn, Bernardo Rea Ruanova, John M Morton, Francois Pattou, Erman O Akpinar, Stephanie Sogg, Jacques M Himpens, Vanessa Osborne, Natasja Wijling, Laura Divine, Nadya Isack, Susie Birney, J M Bernadette Keenan, Joe Nadglowski, Jacqueline Bowman, Ken Clare, Riccardo Meloni, Sandra de Blaeij, Theodore K Kyle, Melanie Bahlke, Andrew Healing, Ian Patton, Valerie M Monpellier","doi":"10.1111/obr.13849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of standardization in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has made measurement and comparison of quality of life (QoL) outcomes in research focused on obesity treatment challenging. This study reports on the results of the second and third global multidisciplinary Standardizing Quality of life measures in Obesity Treatment (S.Q.O.T.) consensus meetings, where a core set of PROMs to measure nine previously selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obesity treatment research was established. The S.Q.O.T. II online and S.Q.O.T. III face-to-face hybrid consensus meetings were held in October 2021 and May 2022. The meetings were led by an independent moderator specializing in PRO measurement. Nominal group techniques, Delphi exercises, and anonymous voting were used to select the most suitable PROMs by consensus. The meetings were attended by 28 and 27 participants, respectively, including a geographically diverse selection of people living with obesity (PLWO) and experts from various disciplines. Out of 24 PROs and 16 PROMs identified in the first S.Q.O.T. consensus meeting, the following nine PROs and three PROMs were selected via consensus: BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), IWQOL-Lite (self-esteem), and QOLOS (excess skin). No PROM was selected to measure stigma as existing PROMs deemed to be inadequate. A core set of PROMs to measure QoL in research focused on obesity treatment has been selected incorporating patients' and experts' opinions. This core set should serve as a minimum to use in obesity research studies and can be combined with clinical parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The lack of standardization in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has made measurement and comparison of quality of life (QoL) outcomes in research focused on obesity treatment challenging. This study reports on the results of the second and third global multidisciplinary Standardizing Quality of life measures in Obesity Treatment (S.Q.O.T.) consensus meetings, where a core set of PROMs to measure nine previously selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obesity treatment research was established. The S.Q.O.T. II online and S.Q.O.T. III face-to-face hybrid consensus meetings were held in October 2021 and May 2022. The meetings were led by an independent moderator specializing in PRO measurement. Nominal group techniques, Delphi exercises, and anonymous voting were used to select the most suitable PROMs by consensus. The meetings were attended by 28 and 27 participants, respectively, including a geographically diverse selection of people living with obesity (PLWO) and experts from various disciplines. Out of 24 PROs and 16 PROMs identified in the first S.Q.O.T. consensus meeting, the following nine PROs and three PROMs were selected via consensus: BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), IWQOL-Lite (self-esteem), and QOLOS (excess skin). No PROM was selected to measure stigma as existing PROMs deemed to be inadequate. A core set of PROMs to measure QoL in research focused on obesity treatment has been selected incorporating patients' and experts' opinions. This core set should serve as a minimum to use in obesity research studies and can be combined with clinical parameters.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.