{"title":"Comprehensive assessment of imaging quality of artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing-based MR images in routine clinical settings.","authors":"Adiraju Karthik, Kamal Aggarwal, Aakaar Kapoor, Dharmesh Singh, Lingzhi Hu, Akash Gandhamal, Dileep Kumar","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01463-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional MR acceleration techniques, such as compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and half Fourier often face limitations, including noise amplification, reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and increased susceptibility to artifacts, which can compromise image quality, especially in high-speed acquisitions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted compressed sensing (ACS) has emerged as a novel approach that combines the conventional techniques with advanced AI algorithms. The objective of this study was to examine the imaging quality of the ACS approach by qualitative and quantitative analysis for brain, spine, kidney, liver, and knee MR imaging, as well as compare the performance of this method with conventional (non-ACS) MR imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 50 subjects. Three radiologists independently assessed the quality of MR images based on artefacts, image sharpness, overall image quality and diagnostic efficacy. SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), edge content (EC), enhancement measure (EME), scanning time were used for quantitative evaluation. The Cohen's kappa correlation coefficient (k) was employed to measure radiologists' inter-observer agreement, and the Mann Whitney U-test used for comparison between non-ACS and ACS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis of three radiologists demonstrated that ACS images showed superior clinical information than non-ACS images with a mean k of ~ 0.70. The images acquired with ACS approach showed statistically higher values (p < 0.05) for SNR, CNR, EC, and EME compared to the non-ACS images. Furthermore, the study's findings indicated that ACS-enabled images reduced scan time by more than 50% while maintaining high imaging quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating ACS technology into routine clinical settings has the potential to speed up image acquisition, improve image quality, and enhance diagnostic procedures and patient throughput.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01463-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Conventional MR acceleration techniques, such as compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and half Fourier often face limitations, including noise amplification, reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and increased susceptibility to artifacts, which can compromise image quality, especially in high-speed acquisitions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted compressed sensing (ACS) has emerged as a novel approach that combines the conventional techniques with advanced AI algorithms. The objective of this study was to examine the imaging quality of the ACS approach by qualitative and quantitative analysis for brain, spine, kidney, liver, and knee MR imaging, as well as compare the performance of this method with conventional (non-ACS) MR imaging.
Methods: This study included 50 subjects. Three radiologists independently assessed the quality of MR images based on artefacts, image sharpness, overall image quality and diagnostic efficacy. SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), edge content (EC), enhancement measure (EME), scanning time were used for quantitative evaluation. The Cohen's kappa correlation coefficient (k) was employed to measure radiologists' inter-observer agreement, and the Mann Whitney U-test used for comparison between non-ACS and ACS.
Results: The qualitative analysis of three radiologists demonstrated that ACS images showed superior clinical information than non-ACS images with a mean k of ~ 0.70. The images acquired with ACS approach showed statistically higher values (p < 0.05) for SNR, CNR, EC, and EME compared to the non-ACS images. Furthermore, the study's findings indicated that ACS-enabled images reduced scan time by more than 50% while maintaining high imaging quality.
Conclusion: Integrating ACS technology into routine clinical settings has the potential to speed up image acquisition, improve image quality, and enhance diagnostic procedures and patient throughput.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.