The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual educator visits in adults with non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111899
{"title":"The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual educator visits in adults with non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Estimate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual diabetes educator visits for improving glycemic management in adults with type 2 diabetes, <em>not</em> on insulin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin, and HbA1c &gt; 7.0 % were enrolled in an open-label randomized trial of 6 weeks of CGM with telemonitoring versus enhanced usual care. Both groups received educator visits. HbA1c was assessed at 12 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 105 participants (mean age 57.3 years, 49.5 % females, mean baseline HbA1c 8.0 %), 86 remained at follow-up. Change in HbA1c was −0.69 % (CGM) versus −0.33 % (enhanced usual care). Adjusting for baseline HbA1c, CGM was superior (0.65 % greater HbA1c reduction [95 % CI 0.17–1.12 %], p = 0.008). CGM participants were 92 % (RR = 1.92, 1.19–3.06, p = 0.007) more likely to have an HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.5 %, lost more weight (difference in weight reduction 2.17 kg, 0.22–4.11, p = 0.029) and were more satisfied with their treatment. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CGM with virtual diabetes educator visits is effective, safe, and acceptable in adults with type 2 diabetes not on insulin and should be considered as an alternative to drug therapy for improving blood glucose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016882272400809X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Estimate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual diabetes educator visits for improving glycemic management in adults with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin.

Methods

Participants with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin, and HbA1c > 7.0 % were enrolled in an open-label randomized trial of 6 weeks of CGM with telemonitoring versus enhanced usual care. Both groups received educator visits. HbA1c was assessed at 12 weeks.

Results

Of 105 participants (mean age 57.3 years, 49.5 % females, mean baseline HbA1c 8.0 %), 86 remained at follow-up. Change in HbA1c was −0.69 % (CGM) versus −0.33 % (enhanced usual care). Adjusting for baseline HbA1c, CGM was superior (0.65 % greater HbA1c reduction [95 % CI 0.17–1.12 %], p = 0.008). CGM participants were 92 % (RR = 1.92, 1.19–3.06, p = 0.007) more likely to have an HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.5 %, lost more weight (difference in weight reduction 2.17 kg, 0.22–4.11, p = 0.029) and were more satisfied with their treatment. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

CGM with virtual diabetes educator visits is effective, safe, and acceptable in adults with type 2 diabetes not on insulin and should be considered as an alternative to drug therapy for improving blood glucose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对非胰岛素依赖型 2 型糖尿病成人患者进行持续葡萄糖监测和远程远程监测虚拟教育访问的有效性:随机试验。
目的:评估连续血糖监测(CGM)与远程远程监测支持的虚拟糖尿病教育访问对改善未使用胰岛素的成人 2 型糖尿病患者血糖管理的效果:未使用胰岛素且 HbA1c > 7.0 % 的 2 型糖尿病患者参加了一项为期 6 周的远程监控 CGM 与强化常规护理的开放标签随机试验。两组患者都接受了教育工作者的访问。12 周后对 HbA1c 进行评估:在 105 名参与者(平均年龄 57.3 岁,49.5% 为女性,平均 HbA1c 基线值为 8.0%)中,有 86 人继续接受随访。HbA1c的变化率为-0.69%(CGM)与-0.33%(强化常规护理)。调整基线 HbA1c 后,CGM 更胜一筹(HbA1c 下降率增加了 0.65 % [95 % CI 0.17-1.12%],p = 0.008)。没有观察到与治疗相关的不良事件:结论:对于未使用胰岛素的成人 2 型糖尿病患者来说,带有虚拟糖尿病教育者访问的 CGM 是有效、安全和可接受的,应被视为改善血糖的药物治疗替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual educator visits in adults with non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial Time in range and mean glucose cut-off points for reduction of fetal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using automated insulin delivery systems Cardiovascular disease modifies the relationship between systolic blood pressure and outcomes in people with diabetes Let's put well-being at the heart of diabetes care. Real-world efficacy and safety of open-source automated insulin delivery for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Experience from mainland China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1