Briony Larance, Isabella Ingram, Chloe Haynes, Lexi Buckfield, Choon Wee Melvin Goh, Peter J Kelly
{"title":"New South Wales alcohol and other drug service providers' perceptions of the relative importance of client variables for determining treatment need.","authors":"Briony Larance, Isabella Ingram, Chloe Haynes, Lexi Buckfield, Choon Wee Melvin Goh, Peter J Kelly","doi":"10.1111/dar.13952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines alcohol and other drug (AOD) service providers' perceptions of the most important variables (client complexity and demographic) for determining treatment need and intensity of intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online cross-sectional survey of N = 188 clinicians/service managers working in AOD services across metropolitan and regional/rural New South Wales, Australia. Participants ranked the importance of demographic and family factors, substance use, physical health, mental health, functioning and activities of daily living and youth-specific variables in identifying treatment need (five-point Likert scales).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 90% of participants ranked 43 out 56 potential variables as 'very important'/'essential' in identifying treatment need. The 10 variables most ranked as 'very important'/'essential' were 'pregnant or breastfeeding' (95.2%), 'suicide/self-harm' (95.2%), 'overdose risk' (94.7%), 'abuse/neglect' (among youth/adolescent populations; 94.1%), 'mental health severity' (93.6%), 'dependent children' (93.1%), 'co-existing mental health concerns' (93.0%), 'hospitalisations due to mental health' (92.5%), 'child protection concerns' (among youth/adolescent populations; 92.2%) and 'disability' (91.5%). The 10 variables most commonly ranked as 'slightly important'/'not at all important' included 'citizenship' (63.3%), 'sex' (59.6%), 'country of birth' (54.8%), 'highest education' (50.0%), 'sexual orientation' (44.1%), 'relationship status' (33.5%), 'gender' (31.4%), 'transport' (28.2%), 'employment' (23.9%) and 'refugee status' (24.0%). Some ratings differed by geographic location (metropolitan vs. regional/rural) and job role (allied health worker, nurse, doctor or manager).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>This study provides insight into service providers' perceptions of treatment need and intensity associated with a range of client factors. It is a first step towards improvements in routine data collections that are used to inform treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study examines alcohol and other drug (AOD) service providers' perceptions of the most important variables (client complexity and demographic) for determining treatment need and intensity of intervention.
Methods: Online cross-sectional survey of N = 188 clinicians/service managers working in AOD services across metropolitan and regional/rural New South Wales, Australia. Participants ranked the importance of demographic and family factors, substance use, physical health, mental health, functioning and activities of daily living and youth-specific variables in identifying treatment need (five-point Likert scales).
Results: More than 90% of participants ranked 43 out 56 potential variables as 'very important'/'essential' in identifying treatment need. The 10 variables most ranked as 'very important'/'essential' were 'pregnant or breastfeeding' (95.2%), 'suicide/self-harm' (95.2%), 'overdose risk' (94.7%), 'abuse/neglect' (among youth/adolescent populations; 94.1%), 'mental health severity' (93.6%), 'dependent children' (93.1%), 'co-existing mental health concerns' (93.0%), 'hospitalisations due to mental health' (92.5%), 'child protection concerns' (among youth/adolescent populations; 92.2%) and 'disability' (91.5%). The 10 variables most commonly ranked as 'slightly important'/'not at all important' included 'citizenship' (63.3%), 'sex' (59.6%), 'country of birth' (54.8%), 'highest education' (50.0%), 'sexual orientation' (44.1%), 'relationship status' (33.5%), 'gender' (31.4%), 'transport' (28.2%), 'employment' (23.9%) and 'refugee status' (24.0%). Some ratings differed by geographic location (metropolitan vs. regional/rural) and job role (allied health worker, nurse, doctor or manager).
Discussion and conclusions: This study provides insight into service providers' perceptions of treatment need and intensity associated with a range of client factors. It is a first step towards improvements in routine data collections that are used to inform treatment planning.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.