{"title":"Optimizing extubation success: a comparative analysis of time series algorithms and activation functions.","authors":"Kuo-Yang Huang, Ching-Hsiung Lin, Shu-Hua Chi, Ying-Lin Hsu, Jia-Lang Xu","doi":"10.3389/fncom.2024.1456771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The success and failure of extubation of patients with acute respiratory failure is a very important issue for clinicians, and the failure of the ventilator often leads to possible complications, which in turn leads to a lot of doubts about the medical treatment in the minds of the people, so in order to increase the success of extubation success of the doctors to prevent the possible complications, the present study compared different time series algorithms and different activation functions for the training and prediction of extubation success or failure models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared different time series algorithms and different activation functions for training and predicting the success or failure of the extubation model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study using four validation methods show that the GRU model and Tanh's model have a better predictive model for predicting the success or failure of the extubation and better predictive result of 94.44% can be obtained using Holdout cross-validation validation method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proposes a prediction method using GRU on the topic of extubation, and it can provide the doctors with the clinical application of extubation to give advice for reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":12363,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2024.1456771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The success and failure of extubation of patients with acute respiratory failure is a very important issue for clinicians, and the failure of the ventilator often leads to possible complications, which in turn leads to a lot of doubts about the medical treatment in the minds of the people, so in order to increase the success of extubation success of the doctors to prevent the possible complications, the present study compared different time series algorithms and different activation functions for the training and prediction of extubation success or failure models.
Methods: This study compared different time series algorithms and different activation functions for training and predicting the success or failure of the extubation model.
Results: The results of this study using four validation methods show that the GRU model and Tanh's model have a better predictive model for predicting the success or failure of the extubation and better predictive result of 94.44% can be obtained using Holdout cross-validation validation method.
Conclusion: This study proposes a prediction method using GRU on the topic of extubation, and it can provide the doctors with the clinical application of extubation to give advice for reference.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to promoting theoretical modeling of brain function and fostering interdisciplinary interactions between theoretical and experimental neuroscience. Progress in understanding the amazing capabilities of the brain is still limited, and we believe that it will only come with deep theoretical thinking and mutually stimulating cooperation between different disciplines and approaches. We therefore invite original contributions on a wide range of topics that present the fruits of such cooperation, or provide stimuli for future alliances. We aim to provide an interactive forum for cutting-edge theoretical studies of the nervous system, and for promulgating the best theoretical research to the broader neuroscience community. Models of all styles and at all levels are welcome, from biophysically motivated realistic simulations of neurons and synapses to high-level abstract models of inference and decision making. While the journal is primarily focused on theoretically based and driven research, we welcome experimental studies that validate and test theoretical conclusions.
Also: comp neuro