Dietary Health Communication and Conversation Analysis: A Scoping Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2414154
Heidi M Meyer, Katie Ekberg, Genevieve N Healy, Germaine Stockbridge, Sjaan R Gomersall
{"title":"Dietary Health Communication and Conversation Analysis: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Heidi M Meyer, Katie Ekberg, Genevieve N Healy, Germaine Stockbridge, Sjaan R Gomersall","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2414154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, many people don't eat a healthy diet despite policies and public health frameworks deployed to improve dietary status. Healthy diets can prevent, manage, and even reverse chronic disease, highlighting the importance of health professionals addressing healthy diets in clinical consultations. Conversation analysis (CA) is a method that can be used to understand dietary talk in these clinical consultations; however, it is unclear to what extent CA has been used for this purpose. Using PRISMA guidelines, a scoping review was conducted with the aim of identifying and summarizing research where CA was used to examine the dietary health conversations between health professionals and adults. A systematic search resulted in 4161 articles retrieved, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Included studies used CA to examine a variety of phases of dietary health encounters, including dietary assessment, advice-giving and resistance to this dietary advice, and dietary (lifestyle) behavior change negotiations, with <i>n</i> = 6 using audio or video recording, respectively. Studies were conducted in seven countries and across primary, secondary, and tertiary settings. We highlighted that dietary talk, irrespective of purpose (e.g., evaluation, assessment, or persuasion [e.g., behavior change]), is under-researched within the CA field. This is a need for further research using CA on dietary talk across a range of settings, conditions, populations, and talk purposes to understand how health professionals impact patient dietary behaviors. Such understanding has the potential to contribute to the improvement of dietary health communication approaches and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2414154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, many people don't eat a healthy diet despite policies and public health frameworks deployed to improve dietary status. Healthy diets can prevent, manage, and even reverse chronic disease, highlighting the importance of health professionals addressing healthy diets in clinical consultations. Conversation analysis (CA) is a method that can be used to understand dietary talk in these clinical consultations; however, it is unclear to what extent CA has been used for this purpose. Using PRISMA guidelines, a scoping review was conducted with the aim of identifying and summarizing research where CA was used to examine the dietary health conversations between health professionals and adults. A systematic search resulted in 4161 articles retrieved, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Included studies used CA to examine a variety of phases of dietary health encounters, including dietary assessment, advice-giving and resistance to this dietary advice, and dietary (lifestyle) behavior change negotiations, with n = 6 using audio or video recording, respectively. Studies were conducted in seven countries and across primary, secondary, and tertiary settings. We highlighted that dietary talk, irrespective of purpose (e.g., evaluation, assessment, or persuasion [e.g., behavior change]), is under-researched within the CA field. This is a need for further research using CA on dietary talk across a range of settings, conditions, populations, and talk purposes to understand how health professionals impact patient dietary behaviors. Such understanding has the potential to contribute to the improvement of dietary health communication approaches and patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膳食健康交流与对话分析:范围综述》。
在全球范围内,尽管制定了改善饮食状况的政策和公共卫生框架,但许多人的饮食并不健康。健康饮食可以预防、控制甚至逆转慢性疾病,这凸显了卫生专业人员在临床咨询中解决健康饮食问题的重要性。会话分析(CA)是一种可用于了解这些临床咨询中的饮食谈话的方法;然而,目前还不清楚会话分析在多大程度上被用于这一目的。利用 PRISMA 指南,我们进行了一次范围界定综述,目的是识别和总结使用 CA 来检查医疗专业人员与成人之间的饮食健康对话的研究。通过系统检索,共检索到 4161 篇文章,其中 13 项研究符合纳入标准。纳入的研究使用 CA 对膳食健康对话的各个阶段进行了检查,包括膳食评估、给出建议和对该膳食建议的抵制,以及膳食(生活方式)行为改变协商,其中 n = 6 项研究分别使用了录音或录像。研究在 7 个国家进行,涉及初级、二级和三级医疗机构。我们强调,无论目的如何(如评价、评估或说服[如行为改变]),饮食谈话在营养与健康领域的研究都不足。因此,有必要进一步研究在各种环境、条件、人群和谈话目的下使用 CA 的饮食谈话,以了解医疗专业人员如何影响患者的饮食行为。这种了解有可能有助于改善饮食健康交流方法和患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Promoting Resilience and Well-Being of Young Adults with Diabetes Through Digital Storytelling in Arts-Based Research. Has it Really Been 37 Years? The Journey of Health Communication. Narrative Force: How Science and Storytelling Impact Parental Concussion Beliefs and Intentions Through Transportation and Trust. Following Medical Advice of an AI or a Human Doctor? Experimental Evidence Based on Clinician-Patient Communication Pathway Model. COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancies: A Spanish-Language Focus Group Analysis in Texas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1