Understanding Family Caregiver's Self-Initiated Expressions of Concern: Prevalence, Content, Emotional Implication, and Opportunity for Doctor's Empathic Responses in Chinese Pediatric Primary Care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2419701
Nan Christine Wang
{"title":"Understanding Family Caregiver's Self-Initiated Expressions of Concern: Prevalence, Content, Emotional Implication, and Opportunity for Doctor's Empathic Responses in Chinese Pediatric Primary Care.","authors":"Nan Christine Wang","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2419701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the significance of patient expressions of concern in medical interaction, existing research has found that doctors often fail to respond to them or even overlook them. Based on a dataset of video-recorded naturally occurring medical conversations in Chinese pediatric primary care, this study aims to systematically investigate the expressions of concern initiated by the family caregivers of pediatric patients and the responses of doctors. The results show that family caregivers actively initiate expressions of concern, covering a wide range of topics. Doctors respond to these concerns in 68.8% of the cases, while the rest are interrupted, ignored, or minimally acknowledged. In addition, as commonly found in other clinical and cultural contexts, family caregivers rarely express their emotional distress explicitly but rather indicate their underlying emotions implicitly. These findings suggest that a better understanding of the full range of family caregiver's self-initiated expressions of concern and their complexities provide important opportunities for doctors to identify and respond to them empathically.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2419701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the significance of patient expressions of concern in medical interaction, existing research has found that doctors often fail to respond to them or even overlook them. Based on a dataset of video-recorded naturally occurring medical conversations in Chinese pediatric primary care, this study aims to systematically investigate the expressions of concern initiated by the family caregivers of pediatric patients and the responses of doctors. The results show that family caregivers actively initiate expressions of concern, covering a wide range of topics. Doctors respond to these concerns in 68.8% of the cases, while the rest are interrupted, ignored, or minimally acknowledged. In addition, as commonly found in other clinical and cultural contexts, family caregivers rarely express their emotional distress explicitly but rather indicate their underlying emotions implicitly. These findings suggest that a better understanding of the full range of family caregiver's self-initiated expressions of concern and their complexities provide important opportunities for doctors to identify and respond to them empathically.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解家庭照顾者自我主动表达的关注:了解中国儿科初级保健中家庭照顾者自我主动表达的关注:普遍性、内容、情感暗示以及医生做出移情反应的机会。
尽管患者的关切表达在医疗互动中意义重大,但现有研究发现,医生往往无法回应甚至忽略这些关切表达。本研究基于中国儿科基层医疗机构中自然发生的医疗对话视频数据集,旨在系统研究儿科患者家属护理人员主动表达的关切以及医生的回应。研究结果表明,儿科患者家属会主动表达关切,涉及的话题非常广泛。68.8%的情况下,医生会对这些关切做出回应,而其余的情况则被打断、忽略或极少回应。此外,正如在其他临床和文化背景中常见的那样,家庭护理人员很少明确表达他们的情绪困扰,而是含蓄地表明他们的潜在情绪。这些研究结果表明,更好地了解家庭照顾者自我主动表达的各种关切及其复杂性,为医生识别和以同理心应对这些关切提供了重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Promoting Resilience and Well-Being of Young Adults with Diabetes Through Digital Storytelling in Arts-Based Research. Has it Really Been 37 Years? The Journey of Health Communication. Narrative Force: How Science and Storytelling Impact Parental Concussion Beliefs and Intentions Through Transportation and Trust. Following Medical Advice of an AI or a Human Doctor? Experimental Evidence Based on Clinician-Patient Communication Pathway Model. COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancies: A Spanish-Language Focus Group Analysis in Texas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1