Comparative efficacy of PsyPills and OCAT mobile psychological interventions in reducing depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms: A blinded randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.052
Vasile Sîrbu, Oana Alexandra David, Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez, Ivan Blanco
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of PsyPills and OCAT mobile psychological interventions in reducing depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms: A blinded randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Vasile Sîrbu, Oana Alexandra David, Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez, Ivan Blanco","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital applications, such as in smartphone apps format, have shown high suggestive evidence for their efficacy in reducing general distress, but rigorous studies of their efficacy in symptom change and the mechanisms involved are still needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the current multi-arm parallel-group randomized trial, participants aged 18-65 with smartphone access were recruited through social media. They were randomly assigned to two app interventions (PsyPills and OCAT) or an active placebo group (shamOCAT). The primary outcome was psychological distress measured up to one month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 participants from diverse regional and demographic groups of the general population of Romania were randomly allocated into the three groups (PsyPills n = 80; OCAT n = 70; shamOCAT n = 79) and included in intention-to-treat analyses. Both the PsyPills (MD = -522; 95%CI = -10.00 to -0.44; d = 0.48) and OCAT (MD = -6.30; 95%CI = -11.39 to -1.21; d = 0.58) reduced significantly, with medium effect sizes, the psychological distress levels compared with the control group at follow-up. For the separate outcomes, only PsyPills showed significant medium reduction effects for anxiety symptoms (MD = -2.17; 95%CI = -3.83 to -0.50; d = -0.60), while OCAT showed reduction effects of small size for depression (MD = -1.50 (95%CI = -3.53 to 0.54, d = -0.34), that was however statistically nonsignificant.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>We registered high attrition and low adherence rates. Also, lower-than-planned effects might have been statistically underpowered to detect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the high potential of both apps as scalable tools to provide low-intensity self-guided interventions for common psychological problems in the general population and expand opportunities for further research (e.g., confirm and capitulate on the differential effects).</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"945-953"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital applications, such as in smartphone apps format, have shown high suggestive evidence for their efficacy in reducing general distress, but rigorous studies of their efficacy in symptom change and the mechanisms involved are still needed.

Methods: In the current multi-arm parallel-group randomized trial, participants aged 18-65 with smartphone access were recruited through social media. They were randomly assigned to two app interventions (PsyPills and OCAT) or an active placebo group (shamOCAT). The primary outcome was psychological distress measured up to one month.

Results: A total of 229 participants from diverse regional and demographic groups of the general population of Romania were randomly allocated into the three groups (PsyPills n = 80; OCAT n = 70; shamOCAT n = 79) and included in intention-to-treat analyses. Both the PsyPills (MD = -522; 95%CI = -10.00 to -0.44; d = 0.48) and OCAT (MD = -6.30; 95%CI = -11.39 to -1.21; d = 0.58) reduced significantly, with medium effect sizes, the psychological distress levels compared with the control group at follow-up. For the separate outcomes, only PsyPills showed significant medium reduction effects for anxiety symptoms (MD = -2.17; 95%CI = -3.83 to -0.50; d = -0.60), while OCAT showed reduction effects of small size for depression (MD = -1.50 (95%CI = -3.53 to 0.54, d = -0.34), that was however statistically nonsignificant.

Limitations: We registered high attrition and low adherence rates. Also, lower-than-planned effects might have been statistically underpowered to detect.

Conclusion: The results support the high potential of both apps as scalable tools to provide low-intensity self-guided interventions for common psychological problems in the general population and expand opportunities for further research (e.g., confirm and capitulate on the differential effects).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PsyPills 和 OCAT 移动心理干预在减轻抑郁、焦虑和压力症状方面的疗效比较:盲法随机试验
背景:数字应用程序(如智能手机应用程序格式)在减少一般困扰方面的疗效已显示出较高的提示性证据,但仍需对其改变症状的疗效和相关机制进行严格研究:在目前的多组平行随机试验中,通过社交媒体招募了 18-65 岁可使用智能手机的参与者。他们被随机分配到两个应用程序干预组(PsyPills 和 OCAT)或活性安慰剂组(shamOCAT)。主要结果为一个月内的心理困扰测量:共有 229 名来自罗马尼亚不同地区和人口群体的参与者被随机分配到三个小组(PsyPills n = 80;OCAT n = 70;shamOCAT n = 79),并进行了意向治疗分析。与对照组相比,PsyPills(MD = -522;95%CI = -10.00至-0.44;d = 0.48)和OCAT(MD = -6.30;95%CI = -11.39至-1.21;d = 0.58)均在随访时显著降低了心理压力水平,效果中等。在不同的结果中,只有 PsyPills 对焦虑症状(MD = -2.17; 95%CI = -3.83 to -0.50;d = -0.60)有明显的中等程度的减轻效果,而 OCAT 对抑郁症(MD = -1.50 (95%CI = -3.53 to 0.54, d = -0.34)有小程度的减轻效果,但在统计学上并不显著:局限性:我们记录了较高的自然减员率和较低的坚持率。此外,低于计划的效果可能在统计学上检测不到:研究结果表明,这两款应用程序作为可扩展的工具,在针对普通人群的常见心理问题提供低强度自我指导干预方面具有巨大潜力,同时也为进一步研究(例如,确认和确定不同效果)提供了更多机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
The D*Phase-study: Comparing short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder in a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Symptoms of depression, but not PTSD, influence cognitive performance in healthy Army National Guard Soldiers. Is self-disgust an implicit or explicit emotional schema? Accumulation of perceived discrimination over time and likelihood of probable mental health problems in UK adults: A longitudinal cohort study. Effects of subanesthetic repeated esketamine infusions on memory function and NGF in patients with depression: An open-label study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1