Decreasing IV magnesium infusion time to improve delivery of patient care.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1177/10781552241291221
Molly Lofy, Cameron Ninos, Elizabeth Dow-Hillgartner
{"title":"Decreasing IV magnesium infusion time to improve delivery of patient care.","authors":"Molly Lofy, Cameron Ninos, Elizabeth Dow-Hillgartner","doi":"10.1177/10781552241291221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypomagnesemia is a common issue in patients with cancer due to magnesium wasting drugs like calcineurin inhibitors, chemotherapy sides effects such as diarrhea, and poor oral intake. Historically, magnesium has been given over prolonged infusions due to concern for rapid elimination of magnesium when large doses are administered. At UW Health, magnesium was given at a rate of 1g/60 min. A prolonged infusion rate often creates logistical issues including limited IV access, incompatibility concerns and increased chair time. The purpose of this project is to increase the infusion rate of IV magnesium without compromising therapeutic repletion, benefit, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The magnesium infusion rate was increased to the following rates: 4g/60 min, 2g/30 min, 1g/15 min. The primary outcome is the grams of IV magnesium replaced per outpatient visit between the pre-intervention (prolonged) and post-intervention (rapid) groups. Secondary outcomes include assessment of differences in chair time between groups and total incidence of critical magnesium lab values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in magnesium requirements per outpatient visit between a prolonged and rapid magnesium infusion rate (2.18g vs 2.15g; <i>p</i> = 0.49). Additionally, there was no difference in number of outpatient visits (3 vs 3; <i>p</i> = 1). The average chair time was decreased by 110 min per outpatient encounter between the prolonged and rapid magnesium infusion rate, which was determined to be clinically and statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that there is no difference in magnesium requirements between a rapid or prolonged magnesium infusion in both solid and liquid tumor patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241291221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241291221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypomagnesemia is a common issue in patients with cancer due to magnesium wasting drugs like calcineurin inhibitors, chemotherapy sides effects such as diarrhea, and poor oral intake. Historically, magnesium has been given over prolonged infusions due to concern for rapid elimination of magnesium when large doses are administered. At UW Health, magnesium was given at a rate of 1g/60 min. A prolonged infusion rate often creates logistical issues including limited IV access, incompatibility concerns and increased chair time. The purpose of this project is to increase the infusion rate of IV magnesium without compromising therapeutic repletion, benefit, and safety.

Methods: The magnesium infusion rate was increased to the following rates: 4g/60 min, 2g/30 min, 1g/15 min. The primary outcome is the grams of IV magnesium replaced per outpatient visit between the pre-intervention (prolonged) and post-intervention (rapid) groups. Secondary outcomes include assessment of differences in chair time between groups and total incidence of critical magnesium lab values.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in magnesium requirements per outpatient visit between a prolonged and rapid magnesium infusion rate (2.18g vs 2.15g; p = 0.49). Additionally, there was no difference in number of outpatient visits (3 vs 3; p = 1). The average chair time was decreased by 110 min per outpatient encounter between the prolonged and rapid magnesium infusion rate, which was determined to be clinically and statistically significant.

Conclusion: This study suggests that there is no difference in magnesium requirements between a rapid or prolonged magnesium infusion in both solid and liquid tumor patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩短静脉注射镁剂的时间,改善病人护理服务。
简介低镁血症是癌症患者常见的问题,原因包括钙神经蛋白抑制剂等消耗镁的药物、化疗副作用(如腹泻)以及口服摄入量不足。一直以来,由于担心大剂量给药后镁会被快速排出体外,镁都是通过长时间输液来补充的。在华大健康中心,镁的输注速度为 1 克/60 分钟。延长输注时间往往会造成后勤问题,包括静脉注射通道受限、不相容问题和增加坐椅时间。本项目旨在提高静脉输注镁的速度,同时不影响治疗补给、益处和安全性:方法:将镁的输注速度提高到以下水平:方法:将镁输注速度提高到以下速度:4 克/60 分钟、2 克/30 分钟、1 克/15 分钟。主要结果是干预前(长时间)组与干预后(快速)组每次门诊补充静脉注射镁的克数。次要结果包括评估各组间坐椅时间的差异以及关键镁化验值的总发生率:结果:延长镁输注时间组和快速镁输注时间组每次门诊的镁需求量差异无统计学意义(2.18 克 vs 2.15 克;P = 0.49)。此外,门诊次数也没有差异(3 vs 3;p = 1)。延长镁输注时间与快速镁输注时间相比,每次门诊的平均椅子时间减少了 110 分钟,这在临床和统计学上都具有显著意义:这项研究表明,无论是实体瘤还是液体瘤患者,快速还是长时间输注镁元素对镁元素的需求量并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic surface contamination in hospitals: Current practices, challenges and perspectives. Cytomegalovirus viremia and hepatitis B reactivation in patient with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with pralsetinib. Workflow evaluation of environmental contamination with hazardous drugs during compounding and administration in an UK hospital. An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol. Hospital pharmacists' perceived competence in providing care to oncology patients - (HoPP-CoP2).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1