Descriptive analysis of the efficacity of R-GEMOX /R-IE/R-CEPP in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) transplant-ineligible diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Baptiste Fulbert, Théo Vincent, Justine Clarenne, Imman Abdelouahab, Antoine Le Bozec, Eric Durot, Florian Slimano
{"title":"Descriptive analysis of the efficacity of R-GEMOX /R-IE/R-CEPP in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) transplant-ineligible diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).","authors":"Baptiste Fulbert, Théo Vincent, Justine Clarenne, Imman Abdelouahab, Antoine Le Bozec, Eric Durot, Florian Slimano","doi":"10.1177/10781552241313381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) may benefit from a second line anticancer drug regimen but real-life outcomes are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the efficacity of 3 anticancer drug regimens (Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin GEMOX; Ifosfamide and Etoposide IE; Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Procarbazine and Prednisone CEPP) combined with Rituximab (R-) in terms of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Retrospective study including R/R DLBCL patients HSCT ineligible who received at least one cycle of R-GEMOX, R-IE or R-CEPP between 2010 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, biological and survival data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associated variables with survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients (median age 78 [40-102] with predominantly stage III-IV DLBCL (n = 49, 79%), non-germinal center-B like (n = 27, 44%) were included. Median OS and PFS were 9 (CI95% [3-10]) and 4 months (CI95% [2-13]) for R-GEMOX, 4 (CI95% [2-6]) and 1 month (CI95% [1-4]) for R-IE and 5 (CI95% [3-6]) and 3 months (CI95% [2-15]) for R-CEPP, respectively. Univariate analysis selects ECOG, aa-IPI scores, LDH rate and Ann-Arbor stage with no independently association in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three regimens show modest survival benefit especially between last anticancer treatment course and death. Emergence of bispecific antibodies and Cart-cells for which real-life benefits have yet to be demonstrated could be coupled with improved access to early palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241313381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241313381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) may benefit from a second line anticancer drug regimen but real-life outcomes are lacking.
Objective: To describe the efficacity of 3 anticancer drug regimens (Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin GEMOX; Ifosfamide and Etoposide IE; Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Procarbazine and Prednisone CEPP) combined with Rituximab (R-) in terms of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Patients: Retrospective study including R/R DLBCL patients HSCT ineligible who received at least one cycle of R-GEMOX, R-IE or R-CEPP between 2010 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, biological and survival data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associated variables with survival outcomes.
Results: Sixty-two patients (median age 78 [40-102] with predominantly stage III-IV DLBCL (n = 49, 79%), non-germinal center-B like (n = 27, 44%) were included. Median OS and PFS were 9 (CI95% [3-10]) and 4 months (CI95% [2-13]) for R-GEMOX, 4 (CI95% [2-6]) and 1 month (CI95% [1-4]) for R-IE and 5 (CI95% [3-6]) and 3 months (CI95% [2-15]) for R-CEPP, respectively. Univariate analysis selects ECOG, aa-IPI scores, LDH rate and Ann-Arbor stage with no independently association in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: All three regimens show modest survival benefit especially between last anticancer treatment course and death. Emergence of bispecific antibodies and Cart-cells for which real-life benefits have yet to be demonstrated could be coupled with improved access to early palliative care.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...