Risk Score for Predicting AKI from Contrast-Enhanced CT (Pre-CT AKI score): Training and Validation from Retrospective Cohort.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000623
Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Nutthaphol Bumrungsong, Bhapita Phoompho, Raksina Tanin, Suthiya Anumas
{"title":"Risk Score for Predicting AKI from Contrast-Enhanced CT (Pre-CT AKI score): Training and Validation from Retrospective Cohort.","authors":"Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Nutthaphol Bumrungsong, Bhapita Phoompho, Raksina Tanin, Suthiya Anumas","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of a recognized risk evaluation for Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) makes it challenging to counsel patients before the procedure. This study aims to identify the incidence of CA-AKI post CECT, assess the associated risk factors, develop and validate a predictive score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult patients who underwent CECT in 2018 to 2022 were included in the training cohort while those in 2023 formed the external validation cohort. Exclusions applied to patients with CKD stage 5, recent dialysis, or incomplete data. Multiple logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate both internal and external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 21,878 enrolled patients, 6,042 and 2,463 met the inclusion criteria for the training and validation cohorts with a mean eGFR of 86.0 (26.4) and 81.4 (27.6) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. In the training cohort, 492 patients (8.1%) developed CA-AKI, and 49 (0.8%) required dialysis. Independent risk factors for CA-AKI included male gender, clinical setting, hemoglobin levels of <10 g/dL, and baseline eGFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. The model, using a weighted integer score derived from these factors, exhibited an AUROC of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.692-0.743) in the training cohort and 0.706 (95% CI: 0.663-0.748) in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CECT can lead to CA-AKI in specific populations. The Pre-CT AKI risk score for CA-AKI following CECT demonstrated good discriminative power and can be easily applied in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of a recognized risk evaluation for Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) makes it challenging to counsel patients before the procedure. This study aims to identify the incidence of CA-AKI post CECT, assess the associated risk factors, develop and validate a predictive score.

Methods: All adult patients who underwent CECT in 2018 to 2022 were included in the training cohort while those in 2023 formed the external validation cohort. Exclusions applied to patients with CKD stage 5, recent dialysis, or incomplete data. Multiple logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate both internal and external validation.

Results: From 21,878 enrolled patients, 6,042 and 2,463 met the inclusion criteria for the training and validation cohorts with a mean eGFR of 86.0 (26.4) and 81.4 (27.6) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. In the training cohort, 492 patients (8.1%) developed CA-AKI, and 49 (0.8%) required dialysis. Independent risk factors for CA-AKI included male gender, clinical setting, hemoglobin levels of <10 g/dL, and baseline eGFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. The model, using a weighted integer score derived from these factors, exhibited an AUROC of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.692-0.743) in the training cohort and 0.706 (95% CI: 0.663-0.748) in the validation cohort.

Conclusions: CECT can lead to CA-AKI in specific populations. The Pre-CT AKI risk score for CA-AKI following CECT demonstrated good discriminative power and can be easily applied in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对比增强 CT 预测 AKI 的风险评分(Pre-CT AKI 评分):回顾性队列的训练和验证。
背景:造影剂增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)术后造影剂相关急性肾损伤(CA-AKI)缺乏公认的风险评估方法,因此在术前为患者提供咨询具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定 CECT 术后 CA-AKI 的发生率、评估相关风险因素、开发并验证预测评分:所有在 2018 年至 2022 年接受 CECT 的成年患者均被纳入训练队列,而 2023 年的患者则构成外部验证队列。排除CKD 5期、近期透析或数据不完整的患者。采用多元逻辑回归来确定风险因素。接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)用于评估内部和外部验证:在 21,878 名注册患者中,分别有 6,042 和 2,463 人符合训练队列和验证队列的纳入标准,平均 eGFR 分别为 86.0 (26.4) 和 81.4 (27.6) mL/min/1.73 m2。在训练队列中,492 名患者(8.1%)出现了 CA-AKI,49 名患者(0.8%)需要透析。CA-AKI的独立风险因素包括男性性别、临床环境、血红蛋白水平和CECT结果:在特定人群中,CECT 可导致 CA-AKI。CECT后CA-AKI的CCT前AKI风险评分显示出良好的鉴别力,可轻松应用于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
nPOD-Kidney: A Heterogenous Donor Cohort for the Investigation of Diabetic Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Progression. Building a Physician/Advanced Practice Provider Partnership for Inpatient Dialysis Care. Changes in Microbiome in Patients with Kidney Injury after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Palliative Care Intervention Among Older or Adults with Advanced CKD and their Caregivers. Risk of Postoperative Hypermagnesemia in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Assisted Cardiovascular Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1