Apical stress redistribution during anterior vertebral body tethering for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a finite element analysis of a novel surgical technique.
Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, Bahe Hachem, Julien Clin, Franck Le Naveaux, Stefan Parent
{"title":"Apical stress redistribution during anterior vertebral body tethering for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a finite element analysis of a novel surgical technique.","authors":"Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, Bahe Hachem, Julien Clin, Franck Le Naveaux, Stefan Parent","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00987-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Apical stress redistribution (ASR) is proposed to mitigate failure risks after anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It consists in releasing set-screws at peri-apical levels following curve tensioning to redistribute stresses within the construct. This study determines the biomechanical impact and curve correction obtained with ASR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finite element models of anterior vertebral body tethering were constructed for three typical scoliotic patients with Lenke 1 curves. ASR was simulated by releasing tension on the cable at the level of the three apical set screws (i.e. untightening three consecutive periapical set screws), followed by retightening of the set screws without further tensioning. Cable tension, implant forces and spine geometry were compared before and after performing ASR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Periapical cable tension decreased post-ASR, and ASR also reduced the maximum tensions proximally and distally. Postoperative disc height was similar between conventional and ASR approaches. Apical intervertebral disc stresses were shifted from concave to convex compression intra and postoperatively, with a similar pattern between the conventional and ASR techniques. The ASR technique achieved scoliotic curve corrections of 54%, 68%, and 79%, while the conventional technique resulted in corresponding corrections (54%, 68%, and 80%) for subjects 1, 2, and 3. The periapical coronal curves exhibited similar patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASR demonstrated promising apical cable and implant forces re-equilibrium compared to the conventional approach. This novel technique did not impair immediate and postoperative curve correction, while maintaining similar apical intervertebral stress distribution. ASR shows potential to modulate growth while reducing maximum cable tension infra- and supra-apical.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00987-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Apical stress redistribution (ASR) is proposed to mitigate failure risks after anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It consists in releasing set-screws at peri-apical levels following curve tensioning to redistribute stresses within the construct. This study determines the biomechanical impact and curve correction obtained with ASR.
Methods: Finite element models of anterior vertebral body tethering were constructed for three typical scoliotic patients with Lenke 1 curves. ASR was simulated by releasing tension on the cable at the level of the three apical set screws (i.e. untightening three consecutive periapical set screws), followed by retightening of the set screws without further tensioning. Cable tension, implant forces and spine geometry were compared before and after performing ASR.
Results: Periapical cable tension decreased post-ASR, and ASR also reduced the maximum tensions proximally and distally. Postoperative disc height was similar between conventional and ASR approaches. Apical intervertebral disc stresses were shifted from concave to convex compression intra and postoperatively, with a similar pattern between the conventional and ASR techniques. The ASR technique achieved scoliotic curve corrections of 54%, 68%, and 79%, while the conventional technique resulted in corresponding corrections (54%, 68%, and 80%) for subjects 1, 2, and 3. The periapical coronal curves exhibited similar patterns.
Conclusion: ASR demonstrated promising apical cable and implant forces re-equilibrium compared to the conventional approach. This novel technique did not impair immediate and postoperative curve correction, while maintaining similar apical intervertebral stress distribution. ASR shows potential to modulate growth while reducing maximum cable tension infra- and supra-apical.
目的:为降低青少年特发性脊柱侧凸椎体前部系带术后的失败风险,提出了椎体顶端应力再分布(ASR)。它包括在曲线拉伸后释放椎体根尖周围的固定螺钉,以重新分配结构内的应力。本研究确定了 ASR 的生物力学影响和曲线矫正效果:方法:为三名典型的 Lenke 1 型脊柱侧凸患者建立了椎体前部系带的有限元模型。模拟 ASR 的方法是在三个根尖固定螺钉处释放缆线张力(即松开三个连续的根尖周围固定螺钉),然后重新拧紧固定螺钉,不再进一步张力。对 ASR 前后的拉线张力、种植体力和脊柱几何形状进行比较:结果:ASR术后根尖周围缆线张力降低,ASR也降低了近端和远端的最大张力。传统方法和 ASR 方法的术后椎间盘高度相似。椎间盘顶端的应力在术中和术后从凹向压缩转变为凸向压缩,传统方法和ASR方法的模式相似。ASR技术对脊柱侧弯的矫正率分别为54%、68%和79%,而传统技术对受试者1、2和3的矫正率分别为54%、68%和80%。根尖冠周曲线表现出相似的模式:与传统方法相比,ASR 显示出良好的根尖拉线和种植体力再平衡效果。这种新技术不会影响术中和术后的曲线矫正,同时还能保持相似的根尖椎间应力分布。ASR显示出调节生长的潜力,同时降低了心尖下和心尖上的最大缆线张力。
期刊介绍:
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.