A causal role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in random exploration.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-76025-5
Armin Toghi, Mojtaba Chizari, Reza Khosrowabadi
{"title":"A causal role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in random exploration.","authors":"Armin Toghi, Mojtaba Chizari, Reza Khosrowabadi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-76025-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision to explore new options with uncertain outcomes or exploit familiar options with known outcomes is a fundamental challenge that the brain faces in almost all real-life decisions. Previous studies have shown that humans use two main explorative strategies to negotiate this explore-exploit tradeoff. Exploring for the sake of information is called directed exploration, and exploration driven by behavioral variability is known as random exploration. While previous neuroimaging studies have shown different neural correlates for these explorative strategies, including right frontopolar cortex (FPC), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), there is still a lack of causal evidence for most of these brain regions. Here, we focused on the right DLPFC, which was previously supported to be involved in exploration. Using the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and Horizon task on twenty-five healthy right-handed adult participants, we showed that inhibiting rDLPFC did not change directed exploration but selectively reduced random exploration, by increasing reward sensitivity over the average reward of each option. This suggests a causal role for rDLPFC in random exploration, and further supports dissociable neural implementations for these two explorative strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76025-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision to explore new options with uncertain outcomes or exploit familiar options with known outcomes is a fundamental challenge that the brain faces in almost all real-life decisions. Previous studies have shown that humans use two main explorative strategies to negotiate this explore-exploit tradeoff. Exploring for the sake of information is called directed exploration, and exploration driven by behavioral variability is known as random exploration. While previous neuroimaging studies have shown different neural correlates for these explorative strategies, including right frontopolar cortex (FPC), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), there is still a lack of causal evidence for most of these brain regions. Here, we focused on the right DLPFC, which was previously supported to be involved in exploration. Using the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and Horizon task on twenty-five healthy right-handed adult participants, we showed that inhibiting rDLPFC did not change directed exploration but selectively reduced random exploration, by increasing reward sensitivity over the average reward of each option. This suggests a causal role for rDLPFC in random exploration, and further supports dissociable neural implementations for these two explorative strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右侧背外侧前额叶皮层在随机探索中的因果作用
是探索结果不确定的新选项,还是利用已知结果的熟悉选项,这是大脑在几乎所有现实决策中面临的基本挑战。以往的研究表明,人类主要使用两种探索策略来协商探索与利用之间的权衡。为获取信息而进行的探索被称为定向探索,由行为可变性驱动的探索被称为随机探索。虽然之前的神经影像学研究显示了这些探索策略的不同神经相关性,包括右侧前额叶皮层(FPC)、右侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和背侧前扣带回皮层(dACC),但其中大部分脑区仍然缺乏因果关系的证据。在此,我们重点研究了右侧DLPFC,该区域之前被证实参与了探索。通过对 25 名健康的右撇子成年参与者进行连续θ爆发刺激(cTBS)和地平线任务,我们发现抑制右侧 DLPFC 不会改变定向探索,但会通过增加对每个选项平均奖励的奖励敏感性,选择性地减少随机探索。这表明 rDLPFC 在随机探索中起着因果作用,并进一步支持了这两种探索策略的可分离神经实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
期刊最新文献
A causal role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in random exploration. Anisotropy of radiation-induced defects in Yb-implanted β-Ga2O3. Automated volumetric analysis of the inner ear fluid space from hydrops magnetic resonance imaging using 3D neural networks. Effects of direct and conventional planting systems on mycorrhizal activity in wheat grown in the Cerrado. Losartan and enalapril maleate differently influence SARS-CoV-2-infected vero cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1