The talk debrief experience: Intervention in prehospital personnel care during the Covid-19 pandemic.

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2024041
Olga Malas, Xavier Perez-Cuit, Jordi García-Sicard, Andrés Cuartero, Gemma Cuartero
{"title":"The talk debrief experience: Intervention in prehospital personnel care during the Covid-19 pandemic.","authors":"Olga Malas, Xavier Perez-Cuit, Jordi García-Sicard, Andrés Cuartero, Gemma Cuartero","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2024041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study focused on the TALK Debrief Experience in the prehospital personnel (<i>n</i> = 1521) of a western Spanish healthcare region during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The study aimed to apply the TALK clinical debriefing intervention to out-of-hospital clinical staff during pandemics; identify their emotions, thoughts, coping strategies, and solution proposals; determine their demands for improving well-being and coping ability; and disseminate valuable knowledge for addressing trauma in similar situations. The study employed a qualitative methodology within a participatory action research (PAR) framework, conducting group discussions (<i>n</i> = 375) and employing the TALK clinical debriefing method as the guiding framework for the sessions. The discussion group meetings were facilitated by psychologists (<i>n</i> = 67) who had received training in this intervention technique. Various emotions were identified during the sessions, including fear of contagion, lack of control and security, work-related stress, and ethical dilemmas. Proposed solutions and coping strategies addressed increased security measures, promotion of social distancing, stress and anxiety management, and clarity in procedures and provision of protective equipment. The study also highlighted additional demands such as the need for clear information, psychological support, and changes in work practices like reducing strenuous shifts. In conclusion, despite study limitations, such as the lack of long-term follow-up, it emphasized the importance of comprehensively addressing well-being and working conditions during health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"11 3","pages":"819-834"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2024041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focused on the TALK Debrief Experience in the prehospital personnel (n = 1521) of a western Spanish healthcare region during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The study aimed to apply the TALK clinical debriefing intervention to out-of-hospital clinical staff during pandemics; identify their emotions, thoughts, coping strategies, and solution proposals; determine their demands for improving well-being and coping ability; and disseminate valuable knowledge for addressing trauma in similar situations. The study employed a qualitative methodology within a participatory action research (PAR) framework, conducting group discussions (n = 375) and employing the TALK clinical debriefing method as the guiding framework for the sessions. The discussion group meetings were facilitated by psychologists (n = 67) who had received training in this intervention technique. Various emotions were identified during the sessions, including fear of contagion, lack of control and security, work-related stress, and ethical dilemmas. Proposed solutions and coping strategies addressed increased security measures, promotion of social distancing, stress and anxiety management, and clarity in procedures and provision of protective equipment. The study also highlighted additional demands such as the need for clear information, psychological support, and changes in work practices like reducing strenuous shifts. In conclusion, despite study limitations, such as the lack of long-term follow-up, it emphasized the importance of comprehensively addressing well-being and working conditions during health crises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈话汇报经验:在 Covid-19 大流行期间对院前人员护理的干预。
本研究重点关注 COVID-19 大流行期间西班牙西部医疗保健地区院前人员(n = 1521)的 TALK 汇报体验。研究旨在将 TALK 临床汇报干预措施应用于大流行病期间的院外临床工作人员;确定他们的情绪、想法、应对策略和解决建议;确定他们对提高幸福感和应对能力的需求;并传播在类似情况下处理创伤的宝贵知识。这项研究采用了参与式行动研究(PAR)框架内的定性方法,进行小组讨论(n = 375),并采用 TALK 临床汇报法作为会议的指导框架。讨论小组会议由接受过该干预技术培训的心理学家(n = 67)主持。讨论过程中发现了各种情绪,包括对传染的恐惧、缺乏控制和安全感、与工作相关的压力以及道德困境。提出的解决方案和应对策略包括加强安全措施、促进社会疏远、压力和焦虑管理、明确程序和提供保护设备。研究还强调了其他需求,如需要明确的信息、心理支持和改变工作方式,如减少繁重的轮班。总之,尽管研究存在局限性,如缺乏长期跟踪,但它强调了在健康危机期间全面解决福祉和工作条件问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the urban climate crisis: Exploring the nexus of urbanization, climate change, and their impacts on the environment and human well-being - A global perspective. Assessing mental resilience with individual and lifestyle determinants among nursing students: An observational study from Greece. Peer (dyadic) support: a hypertension feasibility study for older African American women. Can hotels be used as alternative care sites in disasters and public health emergencies-A narrative review. Safeguarding nurses' mental health: The critical role of psychosocial safety climate in mitigating relational stressors and exhaustion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1