Susanne G. Barnett , Casey E. Gallimore , Beth Janetski , Amanda Margolis , Beth A. Martin , Joseph A. Zorek
{"title":"Description of a Longitudinal Interprofessional Education Plan and Outcomes From an Inaugural Student Cohort","authors":"Susanne G. Barnett , Casey E. Gallimore , Beth Janetski , Amanda Margolis , Beth A. Martin , Joseph A. Zorek","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe a longitudinal interprofessional education (IPE) plan at 1 school of pharmacy including inaugural student cohort outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Standards 2016 prompted the creation of an IPE task force at the University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Pharmacy to develop and implement an IPE plan consisting of outcome-based goals, a deliberate design, and a formalized assessment strategy (an approach that inspired national consensus guidance from the Health Professions Accreditors Collaborative). Beginning with the 2022 graduating class, required interprofessional learning activities were embedded longitudinally across a 4-year Doctor of Pharmacy program and included classroom-, simulation-, and clinical-based IPE activities. Student learning outcomes, focused on attitudes, skills, and behaviors, were assessed longitudinally using 3 self-reported, validated measures allowing before and after comparisons: Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education–Revised, Version 2, Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment Tool, Version 3, and Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey–Revised, coupled with the Individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>End point Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education–Revised, Version 2 and Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment Tool, Version 3 average scores were in the agree to strongly agree range with statistically significant before and after change in 80% (4 of 5) of subscales. Students’ attainment and demonstration of positive teamwork behaviors were evidenced by statistically significant before and after changes in advanced pharmacy practice experience student Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey–Revised scores and universal satisfactory ratings of advanced pharmacy practice experience students on the Individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A developmentally progressive, longitudinal IPE plan was implemented into a 4-year Doctor of Pharmacy program. Inaugural student cohort assessment results documented students were prepared for interprofessional practice upon graduation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe a longitudinal interprofessional education (IPE) plan at 1 school of pharmacy including inaugural student cohort outcomes.
Methods
Standards 2016 prompted the creation of an IPE task force at the University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Pharmacy to develop and implement an IPE plan consisting of outcome-based goals, a deliberate design, and a formalized assessment strategy (an approach that inspired national consensus guidance from the Health Professions Accreditors Collaborative). Beginning with the 2022 graduating class, required interprofessional learning activities were embedded longitudinally across a 4-year Doctor of Pharmacy program and included classroom-, simulation-, and clinical-based IPE activities. Student learning outcomes, focused on attitudes, skills, and behaviors, were assessed longitudinally using 3 self-reported, validated measures allowing before and after comparisons: Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education–Revised, Version 2, Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment Tool, Version 3, and Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey–Revised, coupled with the Individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool.
Results
End point Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education–Revised, Version 2 and Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment Tool, Version 3 average scores were in the agree to strongly agree range with statistically significant before and after change in 80% (4 of 5) of subscales. Students’ attainment and demonstration of positive teamwork behaviors were evidenced by statistically significant before and after changes in advanced pharmacy practice experience student Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey–Revised scores and universal satisfactory ratings of advanced pharmacy practice experience students on the Individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool.
Conclusion
A developmentally progressive, longitudinal IPE plan was implemented into a 4-year Doctor of Pharmacy program. Inaugural student cohort assessment results documented students were prepared for interprofessional practice upon graduation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.