Additional Diagnostic Value of Cone Beam CT Myelography Performed After Digital Subtraction Myelography for Detecting CSF-venous Fistulas.

Ajay A Madhavan, Niklas Lutzen, Jeremy K Cutsforth-Gregory, Wouter I Schievink, Michelle L Kodet, Ian T Mark, Pearse P Morris, Steven A Messina, John T Wald, Waleed Brinjikji
{"title":"Additional Diagnostic Value of Cone Beam CT Myelography Performed After Digital Subtraction Myelography for Detecting CSF-venous Fistulas.","authors":"Ajay A Madhavan, Niklas Lutzen, Jeremy K Cutsforth-Gregory, Wouter I Schievink, Michelle L Kodet, Ian T Mark, Pearse P Morris, Steven A Messina, John T Wald, Waleed Brinjikji","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>CSF-venous fistulas are a common cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. The diagnosis and precise localization of these fistulas hinges on specialized myelographic techniques, which mainly include decubitus digital subtraction myelography and decubitus CT myelography (using either energy integrating or photon counting detector CT). A previous case series showed that cone beam CT myelography, performed as an adjunctive tool with digital subtraction myelography, increased the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. Here, we sought to determine the additive yield of cone beam CT myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection in a consecutive series of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension who underwent concurrent decubitus digital subtraction myelography and cone beam CT myelography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively searched our institutional database for all consecutive patients who underwent decubitus digital subtraction myelography with adjunctive cone beam CT myelography between 8/5/2021 and 8/5/2024. We excluded any patients harboring extradural CSF on spine imaging, not meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders (3<sup>rd</sup> edition) criteria for spontaneous intracranial hypotension, or not having undergone technically successful cone beam CT myelography in combination with digital subtraction myelography. All myelographic images were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists. We calculated the diagnostic yield of both myelographic tests for localizing a CSF-venous fistula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 100 patients who underwent decubitus digital subtraction myelography with adjunctive cone beam CT. We excluded 15 patients based on above criteria. 59/85 patients had a single definitive CSF-venous fistula. Among positive cases, the fistula was visible on digital subtraction myelography in 38/59 patients and visible on cone beam CT myelography in 59/59 patients. In 26/85 patients, no definitive fistula was identified on either modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cone beam CT myelography increased the diagnostic yield for CSF-venous fistula detection and may be a useful addition to digital subtraction myelography.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CB-CTM = cone beam CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; DSM = digital subtraction myelography; EID-CTM = energy integrating detector CT myelography; PCD CTM = photon counting detector CT myelography; SIH = spontaneous intracranial hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: CSF-venous fistulas are a common cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. The diagnosis and precise localization of these fistulas hinges on specialized myelographic techniques, which mainly include decubitus digital subtraction myelography and decubitus CT myelography (using either energy integrating or photon counting detector CT). A previous case series showed that cone beam CT myelography, performed as an adjunctive tool with digital subtraction myelography, increased the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. Here, we sought to determine the additive yield of cone beam CT myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection in a consecutive series of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension who underwent concurrent decubitus digital subtraction myelography and cone beam CT myelography.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively searched our institutional database for all consecutive patients who underwent decubitus digital subtraction myelography with adjunctive cone beam CT myelography between 8/5/2021 and 8/5/2024. We excluded any patients harboring extradural CSF on spine imaging, not meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders (3rd edition) criteria for spontaneous intracranial hypotension, or not having undergone technically successful cone beam CT myelography in combination with digital subtraction myelography. All myelographic images were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists. We calculated the diagnostic yield of both myelographic tests for localizing a CSF-venous fistula.

Results: We identified 100 patients who underwent decubitus digital subtraction myelography with adjunctive cone beam CT. We excluded 15 patients based on above criteria. 59/85 patients had a single definitive CSF-venous fistula. Among positive cases, the fistula was visible on digital subtraction myelography in 38/59 patients and visible on cone beam CT myelography in 59/59 patients. In 26/85 patients, no definitive fistula was identified on either modality.

Conclusions: Cone beam CT myelography increased the diagnostic yield for CSF-venous fistula detection and may be a useful addition to digital subtraction myelography.

Abbreviations: CB-CTM = cone beam CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; DSM = digital subtraction myelography; EID-CTM = energy integrating detector CT myelography; PCD CTM = photon counting detector CT myelography; SIH = spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字减影髓鞘造影术后进行的锥形束 CT 髓鞘造影术在检测 CSF-静脉瘘方面的额外诊断价值。
背景和目的:脑脊液-静脉瘘是自发性颅内低血压的常见原因。这些瘘管的诊断和精确定位取决于专业的髓核造影技术,主要包括褥疮数字减影髓核造影和褥疮 CT 髓核造影(使用能量积分或光子计数探测器 CT)。之前的一个病例系列显示,锥形束 CT 髓造影作为数字减影髓造影的辅助工具,可提高 CSF-静脉瘘的检出率。在此,我们试图确定锥束 CT 骨髓造影在自发性颅内低血压患者中的附加效果,这些患者同时接受了褥疮数字减影骨髓造影和锥束 CT 骨髓造影:我们回顾性检索了本机构数据库中所有在 2021 年 5 月 8 日至 2024 年 5 月 8 日期间接受褥疮数字减影髓鞘造影术和锥形束 CT 髓鞘造影术辅助检查的连续患者。我们排除了脊柱造影显示硬膜外CSF、不符合《国际头痛疾病分类》(第3版)自发性颅内低血压标准或未接受过技术上成功的锥形束CT髓核造影和数字减影髓核造影的患者。所有髓核造影图像均由两名神经放射科医生独立审查。我们计算了两种脊髓造影检查对定位 CSF-静脉瘘的诊断率:我们确定了 100 名接受褥疮数字减影脊髓造影术并辅助锥形束 CT 的患者。根据上述标准,我们排除了 15 例患者。59/85的患者有一个明确的脑脊液-静脉瘘。在阳性病例中,38/59 例患者的数字减影髓鞘造影可见瘘管,59/59 例患者的锥形束 CT 髓鞘造影可见瘘管。在 26/85 例患者中,两种方法均未发现明确的瘘管:锥形束CT髓核造影提高了CSF-静脉瘘检测的诊断率,可能是数字减影髓核造影的有益补充:缩写:CB-CTM = 锥形束CT髓核造影;CVF = CSF-静脉瘘;DSM = 数字减影髓核造影;EID-CTM = 能量积分探测器CT髓核造影;PCD CTM = 光子计数探测器CT髓核造影;SIH = 自发性颅内低血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion MR Imaging in Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostic Performance of Renal Contrast Excretion on Early-Phase CT Myelography in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Prolonged Venous Transit on Perfusion Imaging is Associated with Longer Lengths of Stay in Acute Large Vessel Occlusions. Accuracy of an nnUNet neural network for the automatic segmentation of intracranial aneurysms, their parent vessels and major cerebral arteries from magnetic resonance imaging-Time of flight (MRI-TOF). Accuracy of Financial Disclosures by Scientific Presenters/Authors at the ASNR 2024 annual meeting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1