Radiomics-driven personalized radiotherapy for primary and recurrent tumors: A general review with a focus on reirradiation

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Cancer Radiotherapie Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.002
{"title":"Radiomics-driven personalized radiotherapy for primary and recurrent tumors: A general review with a focus on reirradiation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This review systematically investigates the role of radiomics in radiotherapy, with a particular emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes, assessing toxicity, and optimizing treatment planning. While the review encompasses various applications of radiomics in radiotherapy, it particularly highlights its potential for guiding reirradiation of recurrent cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search with the search engine PubMed using the keywords “radiomics or radiomic” and “radiotherapy or reirradiation”. Out of 189 abstracts reviewed, 147 original articles were included in the analysis. These studies were categorized by tumor localization, imaging modality, study objectives, and performance metrics, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of external validation and adherence to a standardized radiomics pipeline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review identified 14 tumor localizations, with the majority of studies focusing on lung (33 studies), head and neck (27 studies), and brain (15 studies) cancers. CT was the most frequently employed imaging modality (77 studies) for radiomics, followed by MRI (46 studies) and PET (13 studies). The overall AUC across all studies, primarily focused on predicting the risk of recurrence (94 studies) or toxicity (41 studies), was 0.80 (SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.08). However, only 24 studies (16.3%) included external validation, with a slightly lower AUC compared to those without it. For studies using CT versus MRI or PET, both had a median AUC of 0.79, with IQRs of 0.73–0.86 for CT and 0.76–0.855 for MRI/PET, showing no significant differences in performance. Five studies involving reirradiation reported a median AUC of 0.81 (IQR: 0.73–0.825).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiomics demonstrates considerable potential in personalizing radiotherapy by improving treatment precision through better outcome prediction and treatment planning. However, its clinical adoption is hindered by the lack of external validation and variability in study designs. Future research should focus on implementing rigorous validation methods and standardizing imaging protocols to enhance the reliability and generalizability of radiomics in clinical radiotherapy, with particular attention to its application in reirradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Radiotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321824001495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This review systematically investigates the role of radiomics in radiotherapy, with a particular emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes, assessing toxicity, and optimizing treatment planning. While the review encompasses various applications of radiomics in radiotherapy, it particularly highlights its potential for guiding reirradiation of recurrent cancers.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search with the search engine PubMed using the keywords “radiomics or radiomic” and “radiotherapy or reirradiation”. Out of 189 abstracts reviewed, 147 original articles were included in the analysis. These studies were categorized by tumor localization, imaging modality, study objectives, and performance metrics, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of external validation and adherence to a standardized radiomics pipeline.

Results

The review identified 14 tumor localizations, with the majority of studies focusing on lung (33 studies), head and neck (27 studies), and brain (15 studies) cancers. CT was the most frequently employed imaging modality (77 studies) for radiomics, followed by MRI (46 studies) and PET (13 studies). The overall AUC across all studies, primarily focused on predicting the risk of recurrence (94 studies) or toxicity (41 studies), was 0.80 (SD = 0.08). However, only 24 studies (16.3%) included external validation, with a slightly lower AUC compared to those without it. For studies using CT versus MRI or PET, both had a median AUC of 0.79, with IQRs of 0.73–0.86 for CT and 0.76–0.855 for MRI/PET, showing no significant differences in performance. Five studies involving reirradiation reported a median AUC of 0.81 (IQR: 0.73–0.825).

Conclusion

Radiomics demonstrates considerable potential in personalizing radiotherapy by improving treatment precision through better outcome prediction and treatment planning. However, its clinical adoption is hindered by the lack of external validation and variability in study designs. Future research should focus on implementing rigorous validation methods and standardizing imaging protocols to enhance the reliability and generalizability of radiomics in clinical radiotherapy, with particular attention to its application in reirradiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射组学驱动的原发性和复发性肿瘤个性化放疗:以再照射为重点的综述。
目的:这篇综述系统地研究了放射组学在放疗中的作用,特别强调了定量成像生物标志物在预测临床结果、评估毒性和优化治疗计划中的应用。虽然综述涵盖了放射组学在放疗中的各种应用,但它特别强调了放射组学在指导复发性癌症再照射方面的潜力:方法:我们使用 "放射组学或放射组学 "和 "放射治疗或再照射 "这两个关键词,在PubMed搜索引擎的Medline检索基础上进行了系统性综述。在查阅的 189 篇摘要中,有 147 篇原创文章被纳入分析。这些研究按照肿瘤定位、成像方式、研究目标和性能指标进行了分类,特别强调了是否包含外部验证和是否遵循标准化的放射组学流程:审查确定了 14 种肿瘤定位,其中大部分研究集中在肺癌(33 项研究)、头颈癌(27 项研究)和脑癌(15 项研究)。CT 是放射组学最常用的成像模式(77 项研究),其次是 MRI(46 项研究)和 PET(13 项研究)。所有研究(主要集中在预测复发风险(94 项研究)或毒性(41 项研究))的总体 AUC 为 0.80(SD=0.08)。不过,只有 24 项研究(16.3%)包含外部验证,其 AUC 略低于未包含外部验证的研究。在使用 CT 与 MRI 或 PET 的研究中,两者的 AUC 中位数均为 0.79,CT 的 IQR 为 0.73-0.86,MRI/PET 的 IQR 为 0.76-0.855,显示两者的性能无显著差异。五项涉及再照射的研究报告的中位AUC为0.81(IQR:0.73-0.825):结论:放射组学通过更好的结果预测和治疗计划来提高治疗的精确性,在个性化放疗方面具有相当大的潜力。然而,由于缺乏外部验证和研究设计的差异性,其临床应用受到了阻碍。未来的研究应侧重于实施严格的验证方法和标准化成像方案,以提高放射组学在临床放疗中的可靠性和可推广性,尤其要关注其在再照射中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Radiotherapie
Cancer Radiotherapie 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
23.10%
发文量
129
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Cancer/radiothérapie se veut d''abord et avant tout un organe francophone de publication des travaux de recherche en radiothérapie. La revue a pour objectif de diffuser les informations majeures sur les travaux de recherche en cancérologie et tout ce qui touche de près ou de loin au traitement du cancer par les radiations : technologie, radiophysique, radiobiologie et radiothérapie clinique.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Committee of the new positions of the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique: Toward an advanced practice master in radiotherapy Practice-changing trials on breast cancer Personalizing radiotherapy with adaptive radiotherapy: Interest and challenges Preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for the management of brain metastases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1