Impairments in Proprioceptively-Referenced Limb and Eye Movements in Chronic Stroke.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1177/15459683241289123
Duncan T Tulimieri, Amelia Decarie, Tarkeshwar Singh, Jennifer A Semrau
{"title":"Impairments in Proprioceptively-Referenced Limb and Eye Movements in Chronic Stroke.","authors":"Duncan T Tulimieri, Amelia Decarie, Tarkeshwar Singh, Jennifer A Semrau","doi":"10.1177/15459683241289123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper limb proprioceptive impairments are common after stroke and affect daily function. Recent work has shown that stroke survivors have difficulty using visual information to improve proprioception. It is unclear how eye movements are impacted to guide action of the arm after stroke. Here, we aimed to understand how upper limb proprioceptive impairments impact eye movements in individuals with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Control (N = 20) and stroke participants (N = 20) performed a proprioceptive matching task with upper limb and eye movements. A KINARM exoskeleton with eye tracking was used to assess limb and eye kinematics. The upper limb was passively moved by the robot and participants matched the location with either an arm or eye movement. Accuracy was measured as the difference between passive robot movement location and active limb matching (Hand-End Point Error) or active eye movement matching (Eye-End Point Error).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that individuals with stroke had significantly larger Hand (2.1×) and Eye-End Point (1.5×) Errors compared to controls. Further, we found that proprioceptive errors of the hand and eye were highly correlated in stroke participants (<i>r</i> = .67, <i>P</i> = .001), a relationship not observed for controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eye movement accuracy declined as a function of proprioceptive impairment of the more-affected limb, which was used as a proprioceptive reference. The inability to use proprioceptive information of the arm to coordinate eye movements suggests that disordered proprioception impacts integration of sensory information across different modalities. These results have important implications for how vision is used to actively guide limb movement during rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241289123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Upper limb proprioceptive impairments are common after stroke and affect daily function. Recent work has shown that stroke survivors have difficulty using visual information to improve proprioception. It is unclear how eye movements are impacted to guide action of the arm after stroke. Here, we aimed to understand how upper limb proprioceptive impairments impact eye movements in individuals with stroke.

Methods: Control (N = 20) and stroke participants (N = 20) performed a proprioceptive matching task with upper limb and eye movements. A KINARM exoskeleton with eye tracking was used to assess limb and eye kinematics. The upper limb was passively moved by the robot and participants matched the location with either an arm or eye movement. Accuracy was measured as the difference between passive robot movement location and active limb matching (Hand-End Point Error) or active eye movement matching (Eye-End Point Error).

Results: We found that individuals with stroke had significantly larger Hand (2.1×) and Eye-End Point (1.5×) Errors compared to controls. Further, we found that proprioceptive errors of the hand and eye were highly correlated in stroke participants (r = .67, P = .001), a relationship not observed for controls.

Conclusions: Eye movement accuracy declined as a function of proprioceptive impairment of the more-affected limb, which was used as a proprioceptive reference. The inability to use proprioceptive information of the arm to coordinate eye movements suggests that disordered proprioception impacts integration of sensory information across different modalities. These results have important implications for how vision is used to actively guide limb movement during rehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性脑卒中患者肢体和眼球运动的直觉参照障碍
背景:上肢本体感觉障碍在中风后很常见,会影响日常功能。最近的研究表明,中风幸存者很难利用视觉信息来改善本体感觉。目前还不清楚中风后眼球运动是如何影响手臂动作的。在此,我们旨在了解上肢本体感觉障碍如何影响中风患者的眼球运动:方法:对照组(N = 20)和中风组(N = 20)的参与者进行上肢和眼球运动的本体感觉匹配任务。使用带有眼动跟踪功能的 KINARM 外骨骼评估肢体和眼球运动学。上肢由机器人被动移动,参与者通过手臂或眼球运动来匹配位置。准确度以机器人被动运动位置与主动肢体匹配(手端点误差)或主动眼球运动匹配(眼端点误差)之间的差值来衡量:结果:我们发现,与对照组相比,中风患者的手部误差(2.1 倍)和眼部误差(1.5 倍)明显更大。此外,我们还发现中风患者手部和眼部的本体感觉误差高度相关(r = .67,P = .001),而对照组患者则没有观察到这种关系:结论:眼球运动的准确性随受影响较大的肢体的本体感觉障碍而下降,该肢体被用作本体感觉参考。无法使用手臂的本体感觉信息来协调眼球运动表明,本体感觉障碍会影响不同模态感觉信息的整合。这些结果对康复过程中如何利用视觉积极引导肢体运动具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1