Healthcare providers' expected barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centered long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors: A PanCareFollowUp study

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70225
Dionne Breij, Lars Hjorth, Eline Bouwman, Iris Walraven, Tomas Kepak, Katerina Kepakova, Riccardo Haupt, Monica Muraca, Irene Göttgens, Iridi Stollman, Jeanette Falck Winther, Anita Kienesberger, Hannah Gsell, Gisela Michel, Nicole Blijlevens, Saskia M. F. Pluijm, Katharina Roser, Roderick Skinner, Marleen Renard, Anne Uyttebroeck, Cecilia Follin, Helena J. H. van der Pal, Leontien C. M. Kremer, Jaqueline Loonen, Rosella Hermens, the PanCareFollowUp Consortium
{"title":"Healthcare providers' expected barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centered long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors: A PanCareFollowUp study","authors":"Dionne Breij,&nbsp;Lars Hjorth,&nbsp;Eline Bouwman,&nbsp;Iris Walraven,&nbsp;Tomas Kepak,&nbsp;Katerina Kepakova,&nbsp;Riccardo Haupt,&nbsp;Monica Muraca,&nbsp;Irene Göttgens,&nbsp;Iridi Stollman,&nbsp;Jeanette Falck Winther,&nbsp;Anita Kienesberger,&nbsp;Hannah Gsell,&nbsp;Gisela Michel,&nbsp;Nicole Blijlevens,&nbsp;Saskia M. F. Pluijm,&nbsp;Katharina Roser,&nbsp;Roderick Skinner,&nbsp;Marleen Renard,&nbsp;Anne Uyttebroeck,&nbsp;Cecilia Follin,&nbsp;Helena J. H. van der Pal,&nbsp;Leontien C. M. Kremer,&nbsp;Jaqueline Loonen,&nbsp;Rosella Hermens,&nbsp;the PanCareFollowUp Consortium","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Childhood cancer survivors face high risks of adverse late health effects. Long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors is crucial to improve their health and quality of life. However, implementation remains a challenge. To support implementation of high-quality long-term follow-up care, we explored expected barriers and facilitators for establishing this follow-up care among healthcare providers from four European clinics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative study was conducted using four focus groups comprising 30 healthcare providers in total. The semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the Grol and Wensing framework. Data was analyzed following a thematic analysis, combining both inductive and deductive approaches to identify barriers and facilitators across the six levels of Grol and Wensing: innovation, professional, patient, social, organizational and economic and political.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most barriers were identified on the organizational level, including insufficient staff, time, capacity and psychosocial support. Other main barriers included limited knowledge of late effects among healthcare providers outside the long-term follow-up care team, inability of some survivors to complete the survivor questionnaire and financial resources. Main facilitators included motivated healthcare providers and survivors, a skilled hospital team, collaborations with important stakeholders like general practitioners, and psychosocial care facilities, utilization of the international collaboration and reporting long-term follow-up care results to convince hospital managers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study identified several factors for successful implementation of long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors. Our findings showed that specific attention should be given to knowledge, capacity, and financial issues, along with addressing psychosocial issues of survivors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"13 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Childhood cancer survivors face high risks of adverse late health effects. Long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors is crucial to improve their health and quality of life. However, implementation remains a challenge. To support implementation of high-quality long-term follow-up care, we explored expected barriers and facilitators for establishing this follow-up care among healthcare providers from four European clinics.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted using four focus groups comprising 30 healthcare providers in total. The semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the Grol and Wensing framework. Data was analyzed following a thematic analysis, combining both inductive and deductive approaches to identify barriers and facilitators across the six levels of Grol and Wensing: innovation, professional, patient, social, organizational and economic and political.

Results

Most barriers were identified on the organizational level, including insufficient staff, time, capacity and psychosocial support. Other main barriers included limited knowledge of late effects among healthcare providers outside the long-term follow-up care team, inability of some survivors to complete the survivor questionnaire and financial resources. Main facilitators included motivated healthcare providers and survivors, a skilled hospital team, collaborations with important stakeholders like general practitioners, and psychosocial care facilities, utilization of the international collaboration and reporting long-term follow-up care results to convince hospital managers.

Conclusion

This study identified several factors for successful implementation of long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors. Our findings showed that specific attention should be given to knowledge, capacity, and financial issues, along with addressing psychosocial issues of survivors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗服务提供者对实施以人为本的儿童癌症幸存者长期随访护理的预期障碍和促进因素:PanCareFollowUp 研究。
背景:儿童癌症幸存者面临后期健康不良影响的高风险。儿童癌症幸存者的长期后续护理对改善他们的健康和生活质量至关重要。然而,实施仍是一项挑战。为了支持高质量长期随访护理的实施,我们对来自欧洲四家诊所的医疗服务提供者建立这种随访护理的预期障碍和促进因素进行了探讨:方法:我们通过四个焦点小组开展了一项定性研究,共有 30 名医疗服务提供者参加。半结构式访谈指南是根据 Grol 和 Wensing 框架制定的。数据分析采用主题分析法,结合归纳法和演绎法,从 Grol 和 Wensing 的六个层面(创新、专业、患者、社会、组织、经济和政治)确定障碍和促进因素:大多数障碍是在组织层面发现的,包括人员、时间、能力和社会心理支持不足。其他主要障碍包括长期随访护理团队以外的医疗服务提供者对晚期效应的了解有限、一些幸存者无法填写幸存者问卷以及财政资源。主要的促进因素包括医护人员和幸存者的积极性、技术熟练的医院团队、与全科医生等重要利益相关者的合作、社会心理护理机构、利用国际合作以及向医院管理者报告长期随访护理结果等:本研究确定了成功实施儿童癌症幸存者长期随访护理的几个因素。我们的研究结果表明,应特别关注知识、能力和财务问题,同时解决幸存者的社会心理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
期刊最新文献
Proposal for Managing Cancer-Related Insomnia: A Systematic Literature Review of Associated Factors and a Narrative Review of Treatment Profiles of Fatigue and Psychological Symptoms in Long-Term Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors—The NOR-CAYACS Study Multi-Omic Analysis Reveals the Impact of Bortezomib in Hyperleukocytic Acute Myeloid Leukemia Early COVID-19 Vaccine Initiation and Completion Among Cancer Survivors and Barriers to Vaccine Completion: Implications for Future COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Rates Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Axis Dysfunction in People With Cancer: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1