New insights into the phylogenetic relationships within the Lauraceae from mitogenomes.

IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY BMC Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7
Yu Song, Qun-Fei Yu, Di Zhang, Li-Gang Chen, Yun-Hong Tan, Wen Zhu, Hua-Long Su, Xin Yao, Chao Liu, Richard T Corlett
{"title":"New insights into the phylogenetic relationships within the Lauraceae from mitogenomes.","authors":"Yu Song, Qun-Fei Yu, Di Zhang, Li-Gang Chen, Yun-Hong Tan, Wen Zhu, Hua-Long Su, Xin Yao, Chao Liu, Richard T Corlett","doi":"10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The family Lauraceae is subdivided into six main lineages: Caryodaphnopsideae, Cassytheae, Cryptocaryeae, Hypodaphnideae, Laureae, and Neocinnamomeae. However, phylogenetic relationships among these lineages have been debatable due to incongruence between trees constructed using nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) sequences and chloroplast (cp) genomes. As with cp DNA, the mitochondrial (mt) DNA of most flowering plants is maternally inherited, so the phylogenetic relationships recovered with mt genomes are expected to be consistent with that from cp genomes, rather than nrDNA sequences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mitogenome of Machilus yunnanensis, with a length of 735,392 bp, has a very different genome size and gene linear order from previously published magnoliid mitogenomes. Phylogenomic reconstructions based on 41 mt genes from 92 Lauraceae mitogenomes resulted in highly supported relationships: sisterhood of the Laureae and a group containing Neocinnamomeae and Caryodaphnopsideae, with Cassytheae being the next sister group, followed by Cryptocaryeae. However, we found significant incongruence among the mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear phylogenies, especially for the species within the Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae lineages. Time-calibrated phylogenetic analyses showed that the split between Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae dated to the later Eocene, around 38.5 Ma, Laureae originated in the Late Cretaceous, around 84.9 Ma, Cassytheae originated in the mid-Cretaceous around 102 Ma, and Cryptocaryeae originated in the Early Cretaceous around 116 Ma. From the Late Cretaceous to the Paleocene, net diversification rates significantly increased across extant clades of major lineages, and both speciation rates and net diversification rates continued steady growth towards the present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The topology obtained here for the first time shows that mt genes can be used to support relationships among lineages of Lauraceae. Our results highlight that both Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae lineages are younger than previously thought, likely first diversifying in the Eocene, and species in the other extant lineages of Lauraceae dates in a long-time span from the Early Cretaceous to the Eocene, and the climate of a period of about 90 million years was relatively warm, while the extant species of Lauraceae then continuously diversified with global cooling from the Eocene to the present day.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"22 1","pages":"241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The family Lauraceae is subdivided into six main lineages: Caryodaphnopsideae, Cassytheae, Cryptocaryeae, Hypodaphnideae, Laureae, and Neocinnamomeae. However, phylogenetic relationships among these lineages have been debatable due to incongruence between trees constructed using nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) sequences and chloroplast (cp) genomes. As with cp DNA, the mitochondrial (mt) DNA of most flowering plants is maternally inherited, so the phylogenetic relationships recovered with mt genomes are expected to be consistent with that from cp genomes, rather than nrDNA sequences.

Results: The mitogenome of Machilus yunnanensis, with a length of 735,392 bp, has a very different genome size and gene linear order from previously published magnoliid mitogenomes. Phylogenomic reconstructions based on 41 mt genes from 92 Lauraceae mitogenomes resulted in highly supported relationships: sisterhood of the Laureae and a group containing Neocinnamomeae and Caryodaphnopsideae, with Cassytheae being the next sister group, followed by Cryptocaryeae. However, we found significant incongruence among the mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear phylogenies, especially for the species within the Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae lineages. Time-calibrated phylogenetic analyses showed that the split between Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae dated to the later Eocene, around 38.5 Ma, Laureae originated in the Late Cretaceous, around 84.9 Ma, Cassytheae originated in the mid-Cretaceous around 102 Ma, and Cryptocaryeae originated in the Early Cretaceous around 116 Ma. From the Late Cretaceous to the Paleocene, net diversification rates significantly increased across extant clades of major lineages, and both speciation rates and net diversification rates continued steady growth towards the present.

Conclusions: The topology obtained here for the first time shows that mt genes can be used to support relationships among lineages of Lauraceae. Our results highlight that both Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae lineages are younger than previously thought, likely first diversifying in the Eocene, and species in the other extant lineages of Lauraceae dates in a long-time span from the Early Cretaceous to the Eocene, and the climate of a period of about 90 million years was relatively warm, while the extant species of Lauraceae then continuously diversified with global cooling from the Eocene to the present day.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从有丝分裂基因组看月桂科植物系统发育关系的新见解。
背景介绍月桂科细分为六个主要分支:Caryodaphnopsideae, Cassytheae, Cryptocaryeae, Hypodaphnideae, Laureae 和 Neocinnamomeae。然而,由于使用核核糖体 DNA(nrDNA)序列和叶绿体(cp)基因组构建的树之间不一致,这些世系之间的系统发育关系一直存在争议。与 cp DNA 一样,大多数有花植物的线粒体(mt)DNA 也是母系遗传的,因此利用 mt 基因组恢复的系统发生关系有望与 cp 基因组而非 nrDNA 序列恢复的系统发生关系保持一致:结果:长度为735,392 bp的云南马氏蛛有丝分裂基因组的基因组大小和基因线性顺序与之前发表的木兰科动物有丝分裂基因组截然不同。基于 92 个月桂科植物有丝分裂基因组中的 41 个 mt 基因进行的系统发生组重建得出了高度支持的关系:月桂科和包含新肉桂科(Neocinnamomeae)和莸科(Caryodaphnopsideae)的姊妹群,仙鹤草科(Cassytheae)是下一个姊妹群,其次是隐花植物科(Cryptocaryae)。然而,我们发现线粒体、叶绿体和核系统发生之间存在明显的不一致性,尤其是 Caryodaphnopsideae 和 Neocinnamomeae 系中的物种。时间校准系统发育分析表明,Caryodaphnopsideae 和 Neocinnamomeae 之间的分裂可追溯到始新世晚期(约 38.5 Ma),Laureae 起源于白垩纪晚期(约 84.9 Ma),Cassytheae 起源于白垩纪中期(约 102 Ma),而 Cryptocaryeae 起源于白垩纪早期(约 116 Ma)。从晚白垩世到古新世,现存各主要类群的净分化率显著增加,直到现在,物种分化率和净分化率仍在稳步增长:本文获得的拓扑结构首次表明,mt 基因可用于支持月桂科各系之间的关系。我们的研究结果突出表明,Caryodaphnopsideae和Neocinnamomeae两个品系都比以前认为的要年轻,很可能在始新世就已经开始分化,而其他现存的月桂科品系中的物种年代跨度很长,从早白垩世到始新世,约9000万年的气候相对温暖,而现存的月桂科物种则随着从始新世到现在的全球变冷而不断分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Ancient genomes from the Tang Dynasty capital reveal the genetic legacy of trans-Eurasian communication at the eastern end of Silk Road. Eurasian spruce bark beetle detects lanierone using a highly expressed specialist odorant receptor, present in several functional sensillum types. Systemic and transcriptional response to intermittent fasting and fasting-mimicking diet in mice. Motif-guided identification of KRAS-interacting proteins. Long-term survival of asexual Zymoseptoria tritici spores in the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1