Mismatch Negativity in Children with Deficits in Auditory Abilities.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-05-25 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1785458
Julia Dalcin Pinto, Déborah Aurélio Temp, Laís Ferreira, Amália El Hatal de Souza, Michele Vargas Garcia, Adriana Neves de Andrade, Eliara Pinto Vieira Biaggio
{"title":"Mismatch Negativity in Children with Deficits in Auditory Abilities.","authors":"Julia Dalcin Pinto, Déborah Aurélio Temp, Laís Ferreira, Amália El Hatal de Souza, Michele Vargas Garcia, Adriana Neves de Andrade, Eliara Pinto Vieira Biaggio","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Mismatch negativity (MMN) represents a negative component of event-related potentials, which is mentioned by guidelines as an important tool to provide measurable data regarding the functionality of the auditory system in acoustic processing. However, the literature still lacks reliable data that can support the clinical use of this potential in the complementary diagnosis of central auditory processing (CAP) disorder (CAPD). <b>Objectives</b>  To analyze whether MMN assessment might be associated with the CAP behavioral test battery, as well as to assess the effects of auditory ability deficits on MMN responses in the pediatric population. <b>Methods</b>  In total, 45 age-matched children participated in the study. They were submitted to the CAP behavior assessment and to MMN. The children were tested with a combination of speech contrast consisting of acoustic syllables [da] versus [ta], governed by the oddball paradigm. <b>Results</b>  Mismatch negativity did not show a direct association with a single test but with the combination of the four tests used as a behavioral test battery to identify CAPD. The results also indicated that the auditory ability deficits influenced the measurement of MMN latency ( <i>p</i>  = 0.003*), but not the amplitude ( <i>p</i>  = 0.857) or the area ( <i>p</i>  = 0.577). <b>Conclusion</b>  Mismatch negativity was shown to be statistically associated with the battery of tests used to identify deficits in auditory abilities in the studied sample rather than with a single behavioral test. The deficits in auditory abilities were observed in the MMN latency. Mismatch negativity can be used to assess children with CAPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"28 4","pages":"e561-e567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Mismatch negativity (MMN) represents a negative component of event-related potentials, which is mentioned by guidelines as an important tool to provide measurable data regarding the functionality of the auditory system in acoustic processing. However, the literature still lacks reliable data that can support the clinical use of this potential in the complementary diagnosis of central auditory processing (CAP) disorder (CAPD). Objectives  To analyze whether MMN assessment might be associated with the CAP behavioral test battery, as well as to assess the effects of auditory ability deficits on MMN responses in the pediatric population. Methods  In total, 45 age-matched children participated in the study. They were submitted to the CAP behavior assessment and to MMN. The children were tested with a combination of speech contrast consisting of acoustic syllables [da] versus [ta], governed by the oddball paradigm. Results  Mismatch negativity did not show a direct association with a single test but with the combination of the four tests used as a behavioral test battery to identify CAPD. The results also indicated that the auditory ability deficits influenced the measurement of MMN latency ( p  = 0.003*), but not the amplitude ( p  = 0.857) or the area ( p  = 0.577). Conclusion  Mismatch negativity was shown to be statistically associated with the battery of tests used to identify deficits in auditory abilities in the studied sample rather than with a single behavioral test. The deficits in auditory abilities were observed in the MMN latency. Mismatch negativity can be used to assess children with CAPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听觉能力缺陷儿童的错配负性。
导言:错配负性(MMN)是事件相关电位的一种负性成分,被指南称为一种重要工具,可提供有关听觉系统在声音处理过程中功能的可测量数据。然而,文献中仍缺乏可靠的数据支持临床使用该电位辅助诊断中枢听觉处理(CAP)障碍(CAPD)。目的 分析 MMN 评估是否可能与 CAP 行为测试相关联,并评估听觉能力缺陷对 MMN 反应的影响。方法 共有 45 名年龄匹配的儿童参与研究。他们接受了 CAP 行为评估和 MMN 测试。在奇球范式下,儿童接受了由声学音节[da]和[ta]组成的语音对比组合测试。结果 错配负性与单项测试没有直接联系,但与作为行为测试组合的四项测试有直接联系,可用于识别 CAPD。结果还表明,听觉能力缺陷会影响 MMN 的测量延迟(p = 0.003*),但不会影响振幅(p = 0.857)或面积(p = 0.577)。结论 研究表明,错配负性在统计学上与用于识别研究样本听觉能力缺陷的一系列测试有关,而不是与单一的行为测试有关。听觉能力的缺陷可从 MMN 潜伏期中观察到。错配负性可用于评估患有儿童听觉障碍的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audiological Characterization of Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. Do Anatomical Variations of Sphenoid Sinus Influence Sella Exposure and Residual Disease in Pituitary Surgery? - A Study in an Indian Population. Dysphagia: Focus in Diagnosis. Efficacy of Expansion Pharyngoplasty without Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy Screening in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Results of a New Treatment Protocol for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Betamethasone for Intratympanic Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1