Reassessing the association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102871
Sawsan Hadhoum , Damien Subtil , Julien Labreuche , Emmanuelle Couvreur , Gilles Brabant , Rodrigue Dessein , Rémi Le Guern
{"title":"Reassessing the association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sawsan Hadhoum ,&nbsp;Damien Subtil ,&nbsp;Julien Labreuche ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Couvreur ,&nbsp;Gilles Brabant ,&nbsp;Rodrigue Dessein ,&nbsp;Rémi Le Guern","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For the past three decades, researchers have proposed an association between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and preterm birth. This association has been questioned since treating BV with antibiotics during pregnancy hasn't led to a decreased risk of preterm birth.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To re-assess the connection between BV and preterm birth by reviewing existing literature.</div></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science using the keywords \"bacterial vaginosis\" and \"preterm birth\" up to November 2020. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022337806).</div></div><div><h3>Selection criteria</h3><div>Studies were included if they: 1) explored the link BV and preterm birth, 2) used diagnostic criteria based on Nugent, Amsel or Spiegel methods, 3) defined preterm birth at &lt;37, 35, or 32 weeks, and 4) involved patients without impending preterm labor symptoms when sampled.</div></div><div><h3>Data collection and analysis</h3><div>Data were extracted and analyzed by region, BV diagnosis method, study period, and quality score.</div></div><div><h3>Mains results</h3><div>A total of 28 studies were included in the analysis (comprising 50,466 patients). There was a significant link between BV and preterm birth, with an overall OR of 1.60 [95% CI, 1.36–1.89]. Heterogeneity was high (I²=67%). The elevated risk remained consistent across geographic areas, diagnostic procedures, study periods, and study quality scale (Newcastle-Ottawa score).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our meta-analysis confirms the association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth. However, the connection appears to be weaker than previously documented. This observation may offer insight into the ineffectiveness of BV treatments in reducing preterm birth risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 102871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For the past three decades, researchers have proposed an association between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and preterm birth. This association has been questioned since treating BV with antibiotics during pregnancy hasn't led to a decreased risk of preterm birth.

Objective

To re-assess the connection between BV and preterm birth by reviewing existing literature.

Search strategy

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science using the keywords "bacterial vaginosis" and "preterm birth" up to November 2020. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022337806).

Selection criteria

Studies were included if they: 1) explored the link BV and preterm birth, 2) used diagnostic criteria based on Nugent, Amsel or Spiegel methods, 3) defined preterm birth at <37, 35, or 32 weeks, and 4) involved patients without impending preterm labor symptoms when sampled.

Data collection and analysis

Data were extracted and analyzed by region, BV diagnosis method, study period, and quality score.

Mains results

A total of 28 studies were included in the analysis (comprising 50,466 patients). There was a significant link between BV and preterm birth, with an overall OR of 1.60 [95% CI, 1.36–1.89]. Heterogeneity was high (I²=67%). The elevated risk remained consistent across geographic areas, diagnostic procedures, study periods, and study quality scale (Newcastle-Ottawa score).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis confirms the association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth. However, the connection appears to be weaker than previously documented. This observation may offer insight into the ineffectiveness of BV treatments in reducing preterm birth risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估细菌性阴道病与早产之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:过去三十年来,研究人员一直认为细菌性阴道病(BV)与早产之间存在关联。由于在孕期使用抗生素治疗细菌性阴道炎并没有降低早产的风险,因此这种关联性受到了质疑:通过回顾现有文献,重新评估 BV 与早产之间的联系:检索策略:以 "细菌性阴道病 "和 "早产 "为关键词,在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统性检索,检索期截至 2020 年 11 月。检索方案遵循 PRISMA 指南,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42022337806)上进行了注册:纳入的研究必须符合以下条件1) 探讨了 BV 与早产之间的联系;2) 使用了基于 Nugent、Amsel 或 Spiegel 方法的诊断标准;3) 在数据收集和分析时定义了早产:按地区、BV 诊断方法、研究时间和质量评分对数据进行提取和分析:主要结果:共有 28 项研究被纳入分析(包括 50 466 名患者)。BV与早产之间存在明显联系,总体OR值为1.60 [95% CI, 1.36-1.89]。异质性很高(I²=67%)。在不同的地理区域、诊断程序、研究时期和研究质量评分(纽卡斯尔-渥太华评分)中,风险升高的情况保持一致:我们的荟萃分析证实了细菌性阴道病与早产之间的关系。结论:我们的荟萃分析证实了细菌性阴道病与早产之间的联系,但这种联系似乎比以前的文献记载要弱。这一观察结果可能有助于了解细菌性阴道病治疗在降低早产风险方面的无效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1