Prognostic value of multimodality imaging in the contemporary management of cardiac sarcoidosis.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002989
Joseph Okafor, Alessia Azzu, Raheel Ahmed, Shreya Ohri, Kshama Wechalekar, Athol U Wells, John Baksi, Rakesh Sharma, Dudley J Pennell, Roxy Senior, Peter Collins, Thomas Luescher, Vasilis Kouranos, Raj Khattar
{"title":"Prognostic value of multimodality imaging in the contemporary management of cardiac sarcoidosis.","authors":"Joseph Okafor, Alessia Azzu, Raheel Ahmed, Shreya Ohri, Kshama Wechalekar, Athol U Wells, John Baksi, Rakesh Sharma, Dudley J Pennell, Roxy Senior, Peter Collins, Thomas Luescher, Vasilis Kouranos, Raj Khattar","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac <sup>18</sup>fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging play key roles in the diagnosis and management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but the relative value of each modality in predicting outcomes has yet to be determined. This study sought to determine the prognostic importance of multimodality imaging data over and above demographic characteristics and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with CS were included. Parameters evaluated included echocardiographic regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA), myocardial strain, LVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) extent, SUVmax and RV FDG uptake. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and serious ventricular arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 208 patients with mean age of 55±13 years and LVEF of 55±12%. During a median follow-up period of 46 (IQR: 18-55) months, 14 patients died and 28 suffered serious ventricular arrhythmias. On multivariable analysis, RWMA (HR for RWMA presence 2.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 5.28, p=0.008), LGE extent (HR per 1% increase 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04, p=0.018), RVEF (HR per 1% decrease 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99, p=0.008) and RV FDG uptake (HR for RV FDG presence 2.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 5.33, p=0.020) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint, while LVEF was not predictive. The risk of adverse events was significantly greater in those with LGE extent ≥15% (HR for ≥15% presence 3.96, 95% CI 2.17 to 7.23, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our CS population, RWMA, LGE extent, RVEF and RV FDG uptake were strong independent predictors of an adverse outcome. These findings offer an important insight into the key multimodality imaging parameters that may be used in a future risk stratification model of patients with CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging play key roles in the diagnosis and management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but the relative value of each modality in predicting outcomes has yet to be determined. This study sought to determine the prognostic importance of multimodality imaging data over and above demographic characteristics and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with CS were included. Parameters evaluated included echocardiographic regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA), myocardial strain, LVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) extent, SUVmax and RV FDG uptake. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and serious ventricular arrhythmia.

Results: The study population consisted of 208 patients with mean age of 55±13 years and LVEF of 55±12%. During a median follow-up period of 46 (IQR: 18-55) months, 14 patients died and 28 suffered serious ventricular arrhythmias. On multivariable analysis, RWMA (HR for RWMA presence 2.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 5.28, p=0.008), LGE extent (HR per 1% increase 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04, p=0.018), RVEF (HR per 1% decrease 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99, p=0.008) and RV FDG uptake (HR for RV FDG presence 2.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 5.33, p=0.020) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint, while LVEF was not predictive. The risk of adverse events was significantly greater in those with LGE extent ≥15% (HR for ≥15% presence 3.96, 95% CI 2.17 to 7.23, p<0.001).

Conclusion: In our CS population, RWMA, LGE extent, RVEF and RV FDG uptake were strong independent predictors of an adverse outcome. These findings offer an important insight into the key multimodality imaging parameters that may be used in a future risk stratification model of patients with CS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模态成像在当代心脏肉瘤病治疗中的预后价值。
背景:超声心动图、心脏磁共振和心脏18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)成像在心脏肉样瘤病(CS)的诊断和管理中发挥着关键作用,但每种模式在预测预后方面的相对价值尚未确定。本研究旨在确定多模态成像数据在人口统计学特征和左心室射血分数(LVEF)之上的预后重要性:方法:纳入新诊断为 CS 的连续患者。评估参数包括超声心动图区域室壁运动异常(RWMA)、心肌应变、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、右心室射血分数(RVEF)、晚期钆增强(LGE)程度、SUVmax 和 RV FDG 摄取。主要终点是全因死亡率和严重室性心律失常的综合结果:研究对象包括 208 名患者,平均年龄为 55±13 岁,LVEF 为 55±12%。中位随访时间为 46 个月(IQR:18-55),14 名患者死亡,28 名患者出现严重室性心律失常。多变量分析显示,RWMA(RWMA 存在的 HR 为 2.55,95% CI 为 1.27 至 5.28,P=0.008)、LGE 范围(每增加 1%,HR 为 1.02,95% CI 为 1.00 至 1.04,P=0.018)、RVEF(每减少 1%,HR 为 0.97,95% CI 0.94 至 0.99,p=0.008)和 RV FDG 摄取(RV FDG 存在的 HR 为 2.48,95% CI 1.15 至 5.33,p=0.020)是主要终点的独立预测因子,而 LVEF 并非预测因子。LGE程度≥15%者发生不良事件的风险明显更高(LGE程度≥15%的HR为3.96,95% CI为2.17至7.23,P=0.020):在我们的 CS 患者中,RWMA、LGE 范围、RVEF 和 RV FDG 摄取是不良预后的强有力的独立预测因素。这些研究结果为我们提供了一个重要的视角,让我们了解未来可能用于 CS 患者风险分层模型的关键多模态成像参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to truncating variants in myosin binding protein C: a Spanish cohort. Composition of cardiac troponin release differs after marathon running and myocardial infarction. Association of prior tuberculosis with cardiovascular status in perinatally HIV-1-infected adolescents. Myocarditis after COVID-19 and influenza infections: insights from a large data set. Spectrum of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis due to T60A(p.Thr80Ala) variant in an Irish Amyloidosis Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1