{"title":"Eating disorder debut cases during COVID-19 lockdown in adults. Exploring differences in treatment outcome contrasting with pre-pandemic onset cases.","authors":"Lucero Munguía, Isabel Baenas, Roser Granero, Noriaki Ohsako, Anahí Gaspar-Pérez, Iván Perales, Magda Rosinska, Isabel Sánchez-Díaz, Jessica Jiménez-Del Toro, Jessica Sánchez-González, Jon Arcelus, Georgios Paslakis, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Fernando Fernández-Aranda","doi":"10.1002/erv.3142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite an increase in eating disorder (ED) cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, there are limited longitudinal studies exploring treatment outcomes. The aims of the present study were: (1) to compare the clinical features of patients with EDs whose onset was during the COVID-19 lockdown (pandemic cohort) against patients with EDs whose onset was prior to the pandemic (pre-pandemic cohort) and, (2) to compare therapy responses between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 115 adult women with an ED. N = 37 new ED cases (pandemic cohort) were diagnosed and included in the study during the pandemic (May 2020-May 2021); these patients did not have any previous history of an ED. We also included N = 78 ED cases (pre-pandemic cohort) diagnosed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic breakout (prior to March 2020). All ED subtypes were considered in both groups and several clinical variables were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, pandemic cohort reported lower levels of impulsivity and higher emotional regulation capacities than the pre-pandemic cohort; however, no differences were found in aspects of general psychopathology and ED related severity. Following treatment, the pandemic cohort showed higher rates of good outcome and lower rates of dropouts than the pre-pandemic cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both cohorts showed similar ED-related symptoms and general psychopathology scores, treatment outcomes were more favourable in the pandemic cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Despite an increase in eating disorder (ED) cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, there are limited longitudinal studies exploring treatment outcomes. The aims of the present study were: (1) to compare the clinical features of patients with EDs whose onset was during the COVID-19 lockdown (pandemic cohort) against patients with EDs whose onset was prior to the pandemic (pre-pandemic cohort) and, (2) to compare therapy responses between the cohorts.
Method: The sample consisted of 115 adult women with an ED. N = 37 new ED cases (pandemic cohort) were diagnosed and included in the study during the pandemic (May 2020-May 2021); these patients did not have any previous history of an ED. We also included N = 78 ED cases (pre-pandemic cohort) diagnosed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic breakout (prior to March 2020). All ED subtypes were considered in both groups and several clinical variables were assessed.
Results: At baseline, pandemic cohort reported lower levels of impulsivity and higher emotional regulation capacities than the pre-pandemic cohort; however, no differences were found in aspects of general psychopathology and ED related severity. Following treatment, the pandemic cohort showed higher rates of good outcome and lower rates of dropouts than the pre-pandemic cohort.
Conclusions: Although both cohorts showed similar ED-related symptoms and general psychopathology scores, treatment outcomes were more favourable in the pandemic cohort.
目的:尽管在 COVID-19 大流行期间饮食失调症(ED)病例有所增加,但探讨治疗效果的纵向研究却十分有限。本研究的目的是(1)比较在 COVID-19 封锁期间发病的 ED 患者(大流行队列)与在大流行之前发病的 ED 患者(大流行前队列)的临床特征;(2)比较两个队列之间的治疗反应:样本包括 115 名患有 ED 的成年女性。在大流行期间(2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月),有 N = 37 例新的 ED 病例(大流行队列)被确诊并纳入研究;这些患者以前没有任何 ED 病史。我们还纳入了 N = 78 例在 COVID-19 大流行爆发前(2020 年 3 月前)诊断的 ED 病例(大流行前队列)。两组病例均考虑了所有 ED 亚型,并对多个临床变量进行了评估:结果:与大流行前的人群相比,大流行前的人群在基线时报告的冲动程度较低,情绪调节能力较强;但在一般精神病理学和 ED 相关严重程度方面没有发现差异。治疗后,大流行人群的良好治疗率高于大流行前人群,辍学率低于大流行前人群:结论:尽管两组患者的 ED 相关症状和一般精神病理学评分相似,但大流行组患者的治疗效果更佳。