Eating disorder debut cases during COVID-19 lockdown in adults. Exploring differences in treatment outcome contrasting with pre-pandemic onset cases.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/erv.3142
Lucero Munguía, Isabel Baenas, Roser Granero, Noriaki Ohsako, Anahí Gaspar-Pérez, Iván Perales, Magda Rosinska, Isabel Sánchez-Díaz, Jessica Jiménez-Del Toro, Jessica Sánchez-González, Jon Arcelus, Georgios Paslakis, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Fernando Fernández-Aranda
{"title":"Eating disorder debut cases during COVID-19 lockdown in adults. Exploring differences in treatment outcome contrasting with pre-pandemic onset cases.","authors":"Lucero Munguía, Isabel Baenas, Roser Granero, Noriaki Ohsako, Anahí Gaspar-Pérez, Iván Perales, Magda Rosinska, Isabel Sánchez-Díaz, Jessica Jiménez-Del Toro, Jessica Sánchez-González, Jon Arcelus, Georgios Paslakis, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Fernando Fernández-Aranda","doi":"10.1002/erv.3142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite an increase in eating disorder (ED) cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, there are limited longitudinal studies exploring treatment outcomes. The aims of the present study were: (1) to compare the clinical features of patients with EDs whose onset was during the COVID-19 lockdown (pandemic cohort) against patients with EDs whose onset was prior to the pandemic (pre-pandemic cohort) and, (2) to compare therapy responses between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 115 adult women with an ED. N = 37 new ED cases (pandemic cohort) were diagnosed and included in the study during the pandemic (May 2020-May 2021); these patients did not have any previous history of an ED. We also included N = 78 ED cases (pre-pandemic cohort) diagnosed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic breakout (prior to March 2020). All ED subtypes were considered in both groups and several clinical variables were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, pandemic cohort reported lower levels of impulsivity and higher emotional regulation capacities than the pre-pandemic cohort; however, no differences were found in aspects of general psychopathology and ED related severity. Following treatment, the pandemic cohort showed higher rates of good outcome and lower rates of dropouts than the pre-pandemic cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both cohorts showed similar ED-related symptoms and general psychopathology scores, treatment outcomes were more favourable in the pandemic cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite an increase in eating disorder (ED) cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, there are limited longitudinal studies exploring treatment outcomes. The aims of the present study were: (1) to compare the clinical features of patients with EDs whose onset was during the COVID-19 lockdown (pandemic cohort) against patients with EDs whose onset was prior to the pandemic (pre-pandemic cohort) and, (2) to compare therapy responses between the cohorts.

Method: The sample consisted of 115 adult women with an ED. N = 37 new ED cases (pandemic cohort) were diagnosed and included in the study during the pandemic (May 2020-May 2021); these patients did not have any previous history of an ED. We also included N = 78 ED cases (pre-pandemic cohort) diagnosed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic breakout (prior to March 2020). All ED subtypes were considered in both groups and several clinical variables were assessed.

Results: At baseline, pandemic cohort reported lower levels of impulsivity and higher emotional regulation capacities than the pre-pandemic cohort; however, no differences were found in aspects of general psychopathology and ED related severity. Following treatment, the pandemic cohort showed higher rates of good outcome and lower rates of dropouts than the pre-pandemic cohort.

Conclusions: Although both cohorts showed similar ED-related symptoms and general psychopathology scores, treatment outcomes were more favourable in the pandemic cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 禁闭期间首次出现的成人进食障碍病例。探索治疗结果与大流行前发病病例的差异。
目的:尽管在 COVID-19 大流行期间饮食失调症(ED)病例有所增加,但探讨治疗效果的纵向研究却十分有限。本研究的目的是(1)比较在 COVID-19 封锁期间发病的 ED 患者(大流行队列)与在大流行之前发病的 ED 患者(大流行前队列)的临床特征;(2)比较两个队列之间的治疗反应:样本包括 115 名患有 ED 的成年女性。在大流行期间(2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月),有 N = 37 例新的 ED 病例(大流行队列)被确诊并纳入研究;这些患者以前没有任何 ED 病史。我们还纳入了 N = 78 例在 COVID-19 大流行爆发前(2020 年 3 月前)诊断的 ED 病例(大流行前队列)。两组病例均考虑了所有 ED 亚型,并对多个临床变量进行了评估:结果:与大流行前的人群相比,大流行前的人群在基线时报告的冲动程度较低,情绪调节能力较强;但在一般精神病理学和 ED 相关严重程度方面没有发现差异。治疗后,大流行人群的良好治疗率高于大流行前人群,辍学率低于大流行前人群:结论:尽管两组患者的 ED 相关症状和一般精神病理学评分相似,但大流行组患者的治疗效果更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1