Comparative Study of Two Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-07 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-22-00456
Amanda Heller-Stark, Lynn Maxfield, Jennifer Herrick, Marshall Smith, Ingo Titze
{"title":"Comparative Study of Two Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Amanda Heller-Stark, Lynn Maxfield, Jennifer Herrick, Marshall Smith, Ingo Titze","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-22-00456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Semi-occluded vocal tract exercises (SOVTEs) are widely used as a therapeutic tool to create flow resistance in the upper airway. The current study was a randomized controlled clinical trial to establish the efficacy of two SOVTE protocols, flow-resistant tube (FRT) and Lessac-Madsen Resonant Voice Therapy (LMRVT). Exploratory investigations included a noninferiority analysis of FRT to the widely adopted therapy protocol (LMRVT), as well as examining the dosing required to improve acoustic measures and subjective ratings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-seven participants with voice disorder were randomized into one of five groups: 4-week FRT (<i>n</i> = 14), 8-week FRT (<i>n</i> = 19), 4-week LMRVT (<i>n</i> = 15), 8-week LMRVT (<i>n</i> = 5), and control (<i>n</i> = 14). Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and Vocal Fatigue Index scores were collected pre- and posttreatment. Acoustic analysis using the Acoustic Voice Quality Index was completed. We compared VHI between controls and 8-week FRT and LMRVT, adjusting for pre-VHI using linear regression. We examined the efficacy of 4-week protocols relative to controls and conducted a noninferiority comparison of FRT (4 and 8 weeks) to LMRVT (4 and 8 weeks) using 5- and 10-point margins. Finally, we compared the 4- versus 8-week sessions for both therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant reduction of VHI in both 8-week FRT relative to controls (-10.60, 95% CI [-19.80, -1.40], <i>p</i> = .025) and 8-week LMRVT (-15.74, 95% CI [-29.40, -2.08], <i>p</i> = .025) was found. We also found an improvement in 4-week FRT relative to controls (-10.11, 95% CI [-20.03, -0.20], <i>p</i> = .046), but the 4-week LMRVT result was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .057). FRT was found to be noninferior to LMRVT in terms of VHI using a 10-point margin (FRT - LMRVT: 0.69, 95% CI [-5.76, 7.15], <i>p</i> = .01), but not using a 5-point margin (<i>p</i> = .054). There were no statistically significant differences in VHI scores between 4- and 8-week sessions for either therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both FRT and LMRVT improved VHI scores relative to controls. FRT was noninferior to LMRVT in terms of VHI scores. There were no statistically significant differences in VHI scores between 4- and 8-week therapy sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"4275-4287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-22-00456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Semi-occluded vocal tract exercises (SOVTEs) are widely used as a therapeutic tool to create flow resistance in the upper airway. The current study was a randomized controlled clinical trial to establish the efficacy of two SOVTE protocols, flow-resistant tube (FRT) and Lessac-Madsen Resonant Voice Therapy (LMRVT). Exploratory investigations included a noninferiority analysis of FRT to the widely adopted therapy protocol (LMRVT), as well as examining the dosing required to improve acoustic measures and subjective ratings.

Method: Sixty-seven participants with voice disorder were randomized into one of five groups: 4-week FRT (n = 14), 8-week FRT (n = 19), 4-week LMRVT (n = 15), 8-week LMRVT (n = 5), and control (n = 14). Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and Vocal Fatigue Index scores were collected pre- and posttreatment. Acoustic analysis using the Acoustic Voice Quality Index was completed. We compared VHI between controls and 8-week FRT and LMRVT, adjusting for pre-VHI using linear regression. We examined the efficacy of 4-week protocols relative to controls and conducted a noninferiority comparison of FRT (4 and 8 weeks) to LMRVT (4 and 8 weeks) using 5- and 10-point margins. Finally, we compared the 4- versus 8-week sessions for both therapies.

Results: A statistically significant reduction of VHI in both 8-week FRT relative to controls (-10.60, 95% CI [-19.80, -1.40], p = .025) and 8-week LMRVT (-15.74, 95% CI [-29.40, -2.08], p = .025) was found. We also found an improvement in 4-week FRT relative to controls (-10.11, 95% CI [-20.03, -0.20], p = .046), but the 4-week LMRVT result was not statistically significant (p = .057). FRT was found to be noninferior to LMRVT in terms of VHI using a 10-point margin (FRT - LMRVT: 0.69, 95% CI [-5.76, 7.15], p = .01), but not using a 5-point margin (p = .054). There were no statistically significant differences in VHI scores between 4- and 8-week sessions for either therapy.

Conclusions: Both FRT and LMRVT improved VHI scores relative to controls. FRT was noninferior to LMRVT in terms of VHI scores. There were no statistically significant differences in VHI scores between 4- and 8-week therapy sessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种半闭塞声道治疗方案的比较研究:随机临床试验
简介半闭塞声道练习(SOVTEs)被广泛用作在上气道产生气流阻力的治疗工具。本研究是一项随机对照临床试验,旨在确定两种 SOVTE 方案的疗效,即阻流管(FRT)和莱萨克-马德森共振嗓音疗法(LMRVT)。探索性研究包括阻流管疗法与广泛采用的疗法方案(LMRVT)的非劣效分析,以及研究改善声学测量和主观评价所需的剂量:67 名嗓音障碍患者被随机分为五组:4 周 FRT 组(14 人)、8 周 FRT 组(19 人)、4 周 LMRVT 组(15 人)、8 周 LMRVT 组(5 人)和对照组(14 人)。在治疗前和治疗后收集嗓音障碍指数(VHI)和嗓音疲劳指数评分。使用声学嗓音质量指数完成声学分析。我们比较了对照组与 8 周 FRT 和 LMRVT 之间的 VHI,并使用线性回归调整了治疗前的 VHI。我们研究了 4 周方案相对于对照组的疗效,并使用 5 点和 10 点差值对 FRT(4 周和 8 周)和 LMRVT(4 周和 8 周)进行了非劣效性比较。最后,我们对两种疗法的 4 周疗程和 8 周疗程进行了比较:结果:与对照组(-10.60,95% CI [-19.80,-1.40],p = .025)和 8 周 LMRVT(-15.74,95% CI [-29.40,-2.08],p = .025)相比,8 周 FRT 的 VHI 均有统计学意义的明显降低。我们还发现,与对照组相比,4 周 FRT 有所改善(-10.11,95% CI [-20.03,-0.20],p = .046),但 4 周 LMRVT 结果无统计学意义(p = .057)。在 VHI 方面,使用 10 点差(FRT - LMRVT:0.69,95% CI [-5.76,7.15],p = .01),FRT 不劣于 LMRVT,但使用 5 点差(p = .054),FRT 不劣于 LMRVT。两种疗法在 4 周和 8 周疗程之间的 VHI 分数差异均无统计学意义:结论:相对于对照组,FRT 和 LMRVT 均能改善 VHI 评分。就 VHI 分数而言,FRT 并不逊于 LMRVT。在为期 4 周和 8 周的治疗过程中,VHI 分数没有明显的统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
期刊最新文献
A Methodological Review of Stimuli Used for Classroom Speech-in-Noise Tests. Cochlear Implant Sound Quality. Aerodynamic Threshold Measures for Reflecting Glottal Closure in Voice Disorders. Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. Linguistic Markers of Subtle Cognitive Impairment in Connected Speech: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1