Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Psychopathology: A Stormy Relationship.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12100096
Roberto Colom, Pei-Chun Shih Ma
{"title":"Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Psychopathology: A Stormy Relationship.","authors":"Roberto Colom, Pei-Chun Shih Ma","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive and non-cognitive traits are frequently analyzed in isolation. However, there is an increasing acknowledgment that their interplay should be considered for enhancing our understanding of human psychological differences. Testing both traits in the same sample of individuals is desirable when addressing their relationships. Here, for that purpose, 299 university students from Spain (mean age = 18.5 years., 83% female) completed a cognitive ability battery comprised by nine tests, the NEO-FFI for assessing the big five personality traits, and the SCL-90-R for evaluating a range of subjective psychopathological symptoms. This resulted in 23 cognitive and non-cognitive variables that were submitted to a data reduction providing four factors: (1) neuroticism/p, (2) cognitive ability/<i>g</i>, (3) agreeableness/A, and (4) introversion/I. Summary factor scores revealed a positive correlation between p and I (0.47), along with negative correlations of A with p (-0.26) and with <i>g</i> (-0.24), and a negative correlation between A and I (-0.16). These factors were related to some degree even when the assessment of the cognitive and non-cognitive variables cannot be considered straightforwardly comparable because the former was performance based, whereas the later was based on self-reports. Conceptual and methodological implications are discussed regarding the three-way relationship among cognitive ability, personality, and subjective psychopathological symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11509011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12100096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive and non-cognitive traits are frequently analyzed in isolation. However, there is an increasing acknowledgment that their interplay should be considered for enhancing our understanding of human psychological differences. Testing both traits in the same sample of individuals is desirable when addressing their relationships. Here, for that purpose, 299 university students from Spain (mean age = 18.5 years., 83% female) completed a cognitive ability battery comprised by nine tests, the NEO-FFI for assessing the big five personality traits, and the SCL-90-R for evaluating a range of subjective psychopathological symptoms. This resulted in 23 cognitive and non-cognitive variables that were submitted to a data reduction providing four factors: (1) neuroticism/p, (2) cognitive ability/g, (3) agreeableness/A, and (4) introversion/I. Summary factor scores revealed a positive correlation between p and I (0.47), along with negative correlations of A with p (-0.26) and with g (-0.24), and a negative correlation between A and I (-0.16). These factors were related to some degree even when the assessment of the cognitive and non-cognitive variables cannot be considered straightforwardly comparable because the former was performance based, whereas the later was based on self-reports. Conceptual and methodological implications are discussed regarding the three-way relationship among cognitive ability, personality, and subjective psychopathological symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知能力、人格和精神病理学:风雨飘摇的关系
认知特质和非认知特质经常被孤立地分析。然而,越来越多的人认识到,为了加深我们对人类心理差异的理解,应该考虑它们之间的相互作用。在处理这两种特质的关系时,最好在同一样本中对它们进行测试。为此,来自西班牙的 299 名大学生(平均年龄为 18.5 岁,83% 为女性)完成了由九项测试组成的认知能力测试、用于评估五大人格特质的 NEO-FFI 以及用于评估一系列主观心理病理症状的 SCL-90-R。结果得出了 23 个认知和非认知变量,并对这些变量进行了数据还原,得出了四个因子:(1)神经质/p,(2)认知能力/g,(3)宜人性/A,(4)内向性/I。因子总分显示,p 和 I 之间呈正相关(0.47),A 与 p(-0.26)和 g(-0.24)呈负相关,A 与 I 呈负相关(-0.16)。即使在认知变量和非认知变量的评估不能直接进行比较的情况下,由于前者以成绩为基础,而后者以自我报告为基础,这些因素在某种程度上也是相关的。本文讨论了认知能力、人格和主观心理病理症状三者之间关系的概念和方法学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Embedding-Based Semantic Analysis Approach: A Preliminary Study on Redundancy Detection in Psychological Concepts Operationalized by Scales. Development and Validation of a Game-Based Assessment for Complex Problem Solving. Teachers' and Parents' Assessments of Primary School Children's Intellectual Investment as Predictors of Change in Need for Cognition. Teachers' Growth Mindset, Perceived School Climate, and Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Moderate the Relationship Between Students' Growth Mindset and Academic Achievement. Differences in Personality Between High-Ability and Average-Ability University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1