Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2401-6234
Sandhyarani Dash
{"title":"Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance.","authors":"Sandhyarani Dash","doi":"10.1055/a-2401-6234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We introduce a novel approach for predicting running performance, designed to apply across a wide range of race distances (from marathons to ultras), elevation gains, and runner types (front-pack to back of the pack). To achieve this, the entire running logs of 15 runners, encompassing a total of 15,686 runs, were analyzed using two approaches: (1) regression and (2) time series regression (TSR). First, the prediction accuracy of a long short-term memory (LSTM) network was compared using both approaches. The regression approach demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 89.13% in contrast, the TSR approach reached an accuracy of 85.21%. Both methods were evaluated using a test dataset that included the last 15 runs from each running log. Secondly, the performance of the LSTM model was compared against two benchmark models: Riegel formula and UltraSignup formula for a total of 60 races. The Riegel formula achieves an accuracy of 80%, UltraSignup 87.5%, and the LSTM model exhibits 90.4% accuracy. This work holds potential for integration into popular running apps and wearables, offering runners data-driven insights during their race preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"8 ","pages":"a24016234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2401-6234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We introduce a novel approach for predicting running performance, designed to apply across a wide range of race distances (from marathons to ultras), elevation gains, and runner types (front-pack to back of the pack). To achieve this, the entire running logs of 15 runners, encompassing a total of 15,686 runs, were analyzed using two approaches: (1) regression and (2) time series regression (TSR). First, the prediction accuracy of a long short-term memory (LSTM) network was compared using both approaches. The regression approach demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 89.13% in contrast, the TSR approach reached an accuracy of 85.21%. Both methods were evaluated using a test dataset that included the last 15 runs from each running log. Secondly, the performance of the LSTM model was compared against two benchmark models: Riegel formula and UltraSignup formula for a total of 60 races. The Riegel formula achieves an accuracy of 80%, UltraSignup 87.5%, and the LSTM model exhibits 90.4% accuracy. This work holds potential for integration into popular running apps and wearables, offering runners data-driven insights during their race preparations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赢得比赛目标:预测跑步成绩的通用方法。
我们介绍了一种预测跑步成绩的新方法,该方法适用于各种比赛距离(从马拉松到超级马拉松)、海拔高度和跑步者类型(前排到后排)。为此,我们采用两种方法分析了 15 名跑步者的全部跑步记录,共计 15,686 次跑步:(1) 回归和 (2) 时间序列回归 (TSR)。首先,使用这两种方法比较了长短期记忆(LSTM)网络的预测准确性。回归方法表现优异,准确率达到 89.13%,而 TSR 方法的准确率为 85.21%。两种方法都使用了一个测试数据集进行评估,该数据集包括每个运行日志的最后 15 次运行。其次,将 LSTM 模型的性能与两个基准模型进行了比较:Riegel 公式和 UltraSignup 公式,共计 60 场比赛。Riegel 公式的准确率为 80%,UltraSignup 为 87.5%,而 LSTM 模型的准确率为 90.4%。这项工作有望集成到流行的跑步应用程序和可穿戴设备中,为跑步者在备赛期间提供数据驱动的洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-limb asymmetry in postural control: Role of individual and contextual factors. Hand and forearm immersion in hot water at half-time enhances subsequent leg muscle strength. Aerobic Versus Resistance Exercise for Overweight: Is there a Difference in Reporting Quality? Do Functional Movement Screens Predict Body Composition Changes after Resistance Training? Assessing the Potential of Hand Grip Strength as an Indicator of Spinal Muscle Size.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1