{"title":"Doses of Botulinum Toxin in Cervical Dystonia: Does Ultrasound Guidance Change Injection Practices?","authors":"Alexandre Kreisler, Léa Mortain, Kaëlig Watel, Eugénie Mutez, Luc Defebvre, Alain Duhamel","doi":"10.3390/toxins16100439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical dystonia is widely understood to benefit from botulinum toxin injections. The injection practices may be influenced by specific factors, including the method of injection. Three main guidance methods can be used: palpation of anatomical landmarks, ultrasound, and electromyography. We investigated how target muscles and doses of botulinum toxin were modified after the transition from surface anatomy (non-guided) to ultrasound (US-guided), in patients with cervical dystonia. We also determined the long-term dose trend.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied a group of 82 patients, who received non-guided injections (median: 16.5 cycles/5.1 years) followed by US-guided injections (median: 12.0 cycles/3.8 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More muscles, and especially deep muscles, were injected during the US-guided period. The total dose and number of injected muscles were higher when US guidance was used, but the mean dose per muscle was lower. Over the long term, the total dose stabilized, and the mean dose per muscle decreased during the US-guided period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our results, the guidance method has a strong impact on the botulinum toxin injection strategy in cervical dystonia (target muscles and dose). Also, the treatment appeared more stable when using US guidance; this could be explained by the good precision of such injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16100439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cervical dystonia is widely understood to benefit from botulinum toxin injections. The injection practices may be influenced by specific factors, including the method of injection. Three main guidance methods can be used: palpation of anatomical landmarks, ultrasound, and electromyography. We investigated how target muscles and doses of botulinum toxin were modified after the transition from surface anatomy (non-guided) to ultrasound (US-guided), in patients with cervical dystonia. We also determined the long-term dose trend.
Methods: We studied a group of 82 patients, who received non-guided injections (median: 16.5 cycles/5.1 years) followed by US-guided injections (median: 12.0 cycles/3.8 years).
Results: More muscles, and especially deep muscles, were injected during the US-guided period. The total dose and number of injected muscles were higher when US guidance was used, but the mean dose per muscle was lower. Over the long term, the total dose stabilized, and the mean dose per muscle decreased during the US-guided period.
Conclusions: According to our results, the guidance method has a strong impact on the botulinum toxin injection strategy in cervical dystonia (target muscles and dose). Also, the treatment appeared more stable when using US guidance; this could be explained by the good precision of such injections.
背景:人们普遍认为颈肌张力障碍可从肉毒毒素注射中获益。注射方法可能受到特定因素的影响,包括注射方法。主要有三种引导方法:解剖标志触诊、超声波和肌电图。我们研究了颈肌张力障碍患者从表面解剖(非引导)过渡到超声(US引导)后,目标肌肉和肉毒毒素剂量的变化情况。我们还确定了长期剂量趋势:我们对一组 82 名患者进行了研究,他们接受了非引导注射(中位数:16.5 个周期/5.1 年),随后接受了 US 引导注射(中位数:12.0 个周期/3.8 年):结果:在 US 引导下注射的肌肉更多,尤其是深层肌肉。使用 US 引导时,总剂量和注射肌肉的数量较高,但每块肌肉的平均剂量较低。从长期来看,总剂量趋于稳定,而在 US 引导期间,每块肌肉的平均剂量有所下降:根据我们的研究结果,引导方法对颈肌张力障碍的肉毒毒素注射策略(目标肌肉和剂量)有很大影响。此外,使用 US 引导时,治疗似乎更加稳定;这可能是因为这种注射具有良好的精确性。