A comprehensive comparison of deep learning-based compound-target interaction prediction models to unveil guiding design principles

IF 7.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Cheminformatics Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1186/s13321-024-00913-1
Sina Abdollahi, Darius P. Schaub, Madalena Barroso, Nora C. Laubach, Wiebke Hutwelker, Ulf Panzer, S.øren W. Gersting, Stefan Bonn
{"title":"A comprehensive comparison of deep learning-based compound-target interaction prediction models to unveil guiding design principles","authors":"Sina Abdollahi,&nbsp;Darius P. Schaub,&nbsp;Madalena Barroso,&nbsp;Nora C. Laubach,&nbsp;Wiebke Hutwelker,&nbsp;Ulf Panzer,&nbsp;S.øren W. Gersting,&nbsp;Stefan Bonn","doi":"10.1186/s13321-024-00913-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The evaluation of compound-target interactions (CTIs) is at the heart of drug discovery efforts. Given the substantial time and monetary costs of classical experimental screening, significant efforts have been dedicated to develop deep learning-based models that can accurately predict CTIs. A comprehensive comparison of these models on a large, curated CTI dataset is, however, still lacking. Here, we perform an in-depth comparison of 12 state-of-the-art deep learning architectures that use different protein and compound representations. The models were selected for their reported performance and architectures. To reliably compare model performance, we curated over 300 thousand binding and non-binding CTIs and established several gold-standard datasets of varying size and information. Based on our findings, DeepConv-DTI consistently outperforms other models in CTI prediction performance across the majority of datasets. It achieves an MCC of 0.6 or higher for most of the datasets and is one of the fastest models in training and inference. These results indicate that utilizing convolutional-based windows as in DeepConv-DTI to traverse trainable embeddings is a highly effective approach for capturing informative protein features. We also observed that physicochemical embeddings of targets increased model performance. We therefore modified DeepConv-DTI to include normalized physicochemical properties, which resulted in the overall best performing model Phys-DeepConv-DTI. This work highlights how the systematic evaluation of input features of compounds and targets, as well as their corresponding neural network architectures, can serve as a roadmap for the future development of improved CTI models.</p><p><b>Scientific contribution</b></p><p>This work features comprehensive CTI datasets to allow for the objective comparison and benchmarking of CTI prediction algorithms. Based on this dataset, we gained insights into which embeddings of compounds and targets and which deep learning-based algorithms perform best, providing a blueprint for the future development of CTI algorithms. Using the insights gained from this screen, we provide a novel CTI algorithm with state-of-the-art performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cheminformatics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13321-024-00913-1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cheminformatics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-024-00913-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of compound-target interactions (CTIs) is at the heart of drug discovery efforts. Given the substantial time and monetary costs of classical experimental screening, significant efforts have been dedicated to develop deep learning-based models that can accurately predict CTIs. A comprehensive comparison of these models on a large, curated CTI dataset is, however, still lacking. Here, we perform an in-depth comparison of 12 state-of-the-art deep learning architectures that use different protein and compound representations. The models were selected for their reported performance and architectures. To reliably compare model performance, we curated over 300 thousand binding and non-binding CTIs and established several gold-standard datasets of varying size and information. Based on our findings, DeepConv-DTI consistently outperforms other models in CTI prediction performance across the majority of datasets. It achieves an MCC of 0.6 or higher for most of the datasets and is one of the fastest models in training and inference. These results indicate that utilizing convolutional-based windows as in DeepConv-DTI to traverse trainable embeddings is a highly effective approach for capturing informative protein features. We also observed that physicochemical embeddings of targets increased model performance. We therefore modified DeepConv-DTI to include normalized physicochemical properties, which resulted in the overall best performing model Phys-DeepConv-DTI. This work highlights how the systematic evaluation of input features of compounds and targets, as well as their corresponding neural network architectures, can serve as a roadmap for the future development of improved CTI models.

Scientific contribution

This work features comprehensive CTI datasets to allow for the objective comparison and benchmarking of CTI prediction algorithms. Based on this dataset, we gained insights into which embeddings of compounds and targets and which deep learning-based algorithms perform best, providing a blueprint for the future development of CTI algorithms. Using the insights gained from this screen, we provide a novel CTI algorithm with state-of-the-art performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全面比较基于深度学习的化合物-目标相互作用预测模型,揭示指导性设计原则。
评估化合物-靶标相互作用(CTIs)是药物发现工作的核心。鉴于经典实验筛选需要花费大量的时间和金钱,人们一直致力于开发能准确预测 CTIs 的基于深度学习的模型。然而,目前还缺乏对这些模型在大型、经过策划的 CTI 数据集上的全面比较。在此,我们对使用不同蛋白质和化合物表征的 12 种最先进的深度学习架构进行了深入比较。这些模型是根据其报告的性能和架构筛选出来的。为了可靠地比较模型性能,我们整理了 30 多万个结合和非结合 CTI,并建立了几个不同规模和信息的黄金标准数据集。根据我们的研究结果,在大多数数据集上,DeepConv-DTI 的 CTI 预测性能始终优于其他模型。在大多数数据集上,它的 MCC 达到 0.6 或更高,是训练和推理速度最快的模型之一。这些结果表明,利用 DeepConv-DTI 中基于卷积的窗口来遍历可训练嵌入是捕捉蛋白质信息特征的一种非常有效的方法。我们还观察到,目标的物理化学嵌入提高了模型性能。因此,我们对 DeepConv-DTI 进行了修改,加入了归一化的物理化学特性,从而产生了整体性能最佳的模型 Phys-DeepConv-DTI。这项工作凸显了对化合物和目标的输入特征及其相应的神经网络架构进行系统评估,可作为未来开发改进型 CTI 模型的路线图。基于该数据集,我们深入了解了哪些化合物和靶标的嵌入以及哪些基于深度学习的算法表现最佳,为 CTI 算法的未来发展提供了蓝图。利用从这一筛选中获得的洞察力,我们提供了一种具有最先进性能的新型 CTI 算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cheminformatics
Journal of Cheminformatics CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cheminformatics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all aspects of cheminformatics and molecular modelling. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: chemical information systems, software and databases, and molecular modelling, chemical structure representations and their use in structure, substructure, and similarity searching of chemical substance and chemical reaction databases, computer and molecular graphics, computer-aided molecular design, expert systems, QSAR, and data mining techniques.
期刊最新文献
GT-NMR: a novel graph transformer-based approach for accurate prediction of NMR chemical shifts Suitability of large language models for extraction of high-quality chemical reaction dataset from patent literature Molecular identification via molecular fingerprint extraction from atomic force microscopy images A systematic review of deep learning chemical language models in recent era Accelerated hit identification with target evaluation, deep learning and automated labs: prospective validation in IRAK1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1