IPFMC: an iterative pathway fusion approach for enhanced multi-omics clustering in cancer research.

IF 6.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Briefings in bioinformatics Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1093/bib/bbae541
Haoyang Zhang, Sha Liu, Bingxin Li, Xionghui Zhou
{"title":"IPFMC: an iterative pathway fusion approach for enhanced multi-omics clustering in cancer research.","authors":"Haoyang Zhang, Sha Liu, Bingxin Li, Xionghui Zhou","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbae541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using multi-omics data for clustering (cancer subtyping) is crucial for precision medicine research. Despite numerous methods having been proposed, current approaches either do not perform satisfactorily or lack biological interpretability, limiting the practical application of these methods. Based on the biological hypothesis that patients with the same subtype may exhibit similar dysregulated pathways, we developed an Iterative Pathway Fusion approach for enhanced Multi-omics Clustering (IPFMC), a novel multi-omics clustering method involving two data fusion stages. In the first stage, omics data are partitioned at each layer using pathway information, with crucial pathways iteratively selected to represent samples. Ultimately, the representation information from multiple pathways is integrated. In the second stage, similarity network fusion was applied to integrate the representation information from multiple omics. Comparative experiments with nine cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), involving systematic comparisons with 10 representative methods, reveal that IPFMC outperforms these methods. Additionally, the biological pathways and genes identified by our approach hold biological significance, affirming not only its excellent clustering performance but also its biological interpretability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"25 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using multi-omics data for clustering (cancer subtyping) is crucial for precision medicine research. Despite numerous methods having been proposed, current approaches either do not perform satisfactorily or lack biological interpretability, limiting the practical application of these methods. Based on the biological hypothesis that patients with the same subtype may exhibit similar dysregulated pathways, we developed an Iterative Pathway Fusion approach for enhanced Multi-omics Clustering (IPFMC), a novel multi-omics clustering method involving two data fusion stages. In the first stage, omics data are partitioned at each layer using pathway information, with crucial pathways iteratively selected to represent samples. Ultimately, the representation information from multiple pathways is integrated. In the second stage, similarity network fusion was applied to integrate the representation information from multiple omics. Comparative experiments with nine cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), involving systematic comparisons with 10 representative methods, reveal that IPFMC outperforms these methods. Additionally, the biological pathways and genes identified by our approach hold biological significance, affirming not only its excellent clustering performance but also its biological interpretability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IPFMC:一种用于增强癌症研究中多组学聚类的迭代路径融合方法。
利用多组学数据进行聚类(癌症亚型)对精准医学研究至关重要。尽管已经提出了许多方法,但目前的方法要么效果不理想,要么缺乏生物学可解释性,限制了这些方法的实际应用。基于同一亚型的患者可能表现出相似的失调通路这一生物学假设,我们开发了一种用于增强多组学聚类的迭代通路融合方法(IPFMC),这是一种新型的多组学聚类方法,包括两个数据融合阶段。在第一阶段,利用通路信息对每一层的 omics 数据进行分区,并迭代选择关键通路来代表样本。最终,来自多条途径的表征信息被整合在一起。在第二阶段,应用相似性网络融合来整合来自多个 omics 的表征信息。用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)中的九个癌症数据集进行的比较实验显示,IPFMC优于这些方法。此外,我们的方法识别出的生物通路和基因具有生物学意义,这不仅肯定了其出色的聚类性能,也肯定了其生物学可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
期刊最新文献
AutoXAI4Omics: an automated explainable AI tool for omics and tabular data. MCGAE: unraveling tumor invasion through integrated multimodal spatial transcriptomics. tcrBLOSUM: an amino acid substitution matrix for sensitive alignment of distant epitope-specific TCRs. Atomistic simulations reveal impacts of missense mutations on the structure and function of SynGAP1. COFFEE: consensus single cell-type specific inference for gene regulatory networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1