Contribution of ultra-processed food and animal-plant protein intake ratio to the environmental impact of Belgian diets

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.008
Claire Dénos , Stefanie Vandevijvere , Lieselot Boone , Margot Cooreman-Algoed , Michiel De Bauw , Wouter M.J. Achten , Jo Dewulf
{"title":"Contribution of ultra-processed food and animal-plant protein intake ratio to the environmental impact of Belgian diets","authors":"Claire Dénos ,&nbsp;Stefanie Vandevijvere ,&nbsp;Lieselot Boone ,&nbsp;Margot Cooreman-Algoed ,&nbsp;Michiel De Bauw ,&nbsp;Wouter M.J. Achten ,&nbsp;Jo Dewulf","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is growing concern about the various impacts of food consumption, both on human and planetary health. Given the context-specific nature of consumption patterns, evaluating their national-level impacts is crucial for proactive policy development. This research aims to evaluate the environmental impact of current Belgian diets, with particular attention to the contribution of food groups, ultra-processed foods (UPF), and the animal-to-plant protein ratio. The methodology consists of three key stages. Firstly, the Belgian diet was summarised, based on data from the Belgian National Food Consumption Survey 2014/2015. Secondly, the origin of the most frequently consumed foods was traced using trade databases. Finally, a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was conducted to determine the impact of Belgian diets on climate change, water use, land use, and fossil resource scarcity. In this third step, an iterative procedure for selecting the food items to be included in the study was performed. The iterative approach resulted in the inclusion of 227 food items in the analysis. The results indicate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 4.4 [4.27–4.54] kg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent per person per day. Red meat (35 %), beverages (16 %), dairy products (12 %) and snacks (10 %) are identified as primary contributors to climate change. Similar results were observed for land use impacts. Water use and fossil resource scarcity exhibited different trends, with beverages being the most impactful food group. Moreover, UPF account for 50 % of the total climate change and land use impacts, with a linear relationship observed between increased UPF consumption and GHG emissions and land use. A similar linear trend is observed between the ratio of animal-to-plant protein intake and both climate change and land use impact categories. A shift from the current protein ratio to a ratio of 40/60, as suggested in the Flemish Green Deal Protein Shift has been shown to result in a reduction in GHG emissions of the diet by 29 %. This study emphasises the need to target the consumption of high-impact foods such as UPF and animal-based products. Future research will investigate the relationship between environmental and health impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 584-598"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255092400294X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing concern about the various impacts of food consumption, both on human and planetary health. Given the context-specific nature of consumption patterns, evaluating their national-level impacts is crucial for proactive policy development. This research aims to evaluate the environmental impact of current Belgian diets, with particular attention to the contribution of food groups, ultra-processed foods (UPF), and the animal-to-plant protein ratio. The methodology consists of three key stages. Firstly, the Belgian diet was summarised, based on data from the Belgian National Food Consumption Survey 2014/2015. Secondly, the origin of the most frequently consumed foods was traced using trade databases. Finally, a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was conducted to determine the impact of Belgian diets on climate change, water use, land use, and fossil resource scarcity. In this third step, an iterative procedure for selecting the food items to be included in the study was performed. The iterative approach resulted in the inclusion of 227 food items in the analysis. The results indicate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 4.4 [4.27–4.54] kg CO2-equivalent per person per day. Red meat (35 %), beverages (16 %), dairy products (12 %) and snacks (10 %) are identified as primary contributors to climate change. Similar results were observed for land use impacts. Water use and fossil resource scarcity exhibited different trends, with beverages being the most impactful food group. Moreover, UPF account for 50 % of the total climate change and land use impacts, with a linear relationship observed between increased UPF consumption and GHG emissions and land use. A similar linear trend is observed between the ratio of animal-to-plant protein intake and both climate change and land use impact categories. A shift from the current protein ratio to a ratio of 40/60, as suggested in the Flemish Green Deal Protein Shift has been shown to result in a reduction in GHG emissions of the diet by 29 %. This study emphasises the need to target the consumption of high-impact foods such as UPF and animal-based products. Future research will investigate the relationship between environmental and health impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超加工食品和动植物蛋白质摄入比例对比利时饮食环境影响的贡献
人们越来越关注食品消费对人类和地球健康的各种影响。鉴于消费模式的具体情况,评估其在国家层面的影响对于制定积极的政策至关重要。本研究旨在评估当前比利时饮食对环境的影响,尤其关注食物种类、超加工食品(UPF)以及动物蛋白与植物蛋白的比例对环境的影响。研究方法包括三个关键阶段。首先,根据 "2014/2015 年比利时全国食品消费调查 "的数据对比利时的膳食进行总结。其次,利用贸易数据库追踪最常消费食品的原产地。最后,进行了 "从摇篮到坟墓 "生命周期评估,以确定比利时饮食对气候变化、水资源利用、土地利用和化石资源稀缺性的影响。在第三步中,我们采用了一种迭代程序来选择纳入研究的食品。迭代法最终将 227 种食品纳入分析。结果显示,每人每天的温室气体排放量为 4.4 [4.27-4.54] 千克二氧化碳当量。红肉(35%)、饮料(16%)、奶制品(12%)和零食(10%)被认为是造成气候变化的主要因素。土地利用的影响也有类似的结果。水的使用和化石资源的稀缺呈现出不同的趋势,饮料是影响最大的食品类别。此外,铀浓缩物占气候变化和土地利用影响总量的 50%,铀浓缩物消费量的增加与温室气体排放和土地利用之间呈线性关系。在动物-植物蛋白摄入量比率与气候变化和土地利用影响类别之间也观察到类似的线性趋势。根据弗拉芒绿色交易蛋白质转变的建议,从目前的蛋白质比例转变为 40/60 的比例,可使饮食中的温室气体排放量减少 29%。这项研究强调,需要有针对性地消费高影响食物,如 UPF 和动物性产品。未来的研究将调查环境和健康影响之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
A value-sensitive approach for integrated seawater desalination and brine treatment Conceptualizing circular economy policy instruments: The case of recycled content standards A review of life cycle impacts and costs of precision agriculture for cultivation of field crops An interlinked dynamic model of timber and carbon stocks in Japan's wooden houses and plantation forests Lithium from clay: Assessing the environmental impacts of extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1