Evidence-based strategies for optimizing long-term temperature monitoring in offices

Peixian Li , Xiangjun Zhao , Siyan Wang , Thomas Parkinson , Richard de Dear , Xing Shi
{"title":"Evidence-based strategies for optimizing long-term temperature monitoring in offices","authors":"Peixian Li ,&nbsp;Xiangjun Zhao ,&nbsp;Siyan Wang ,&nbsp;Thomas Parkinson ,&nbsp;Richard de Dear ,&nbsp;Xing Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-term monitoring of the thermal environment in office buildings has become increasingly relevant with the rise of wireless sensor networks. However, there is a notable absence of explicit guidelines for implementing monitoring strategies in such contexts. This lack of direction can lead to inconsistent deployment of sensor networks, resulting in higher maintenance costs and inaccurate long-term assessments of thermal conditions. Based on data analyses of high-accuracy, high-frequency field measurements conducted over a year or longer across multiple offices in Sydney and Shanghai, this study proposes a strategy for long-term temperature monitoring. The strategy advises practitioners to prioritize considerations such as air-conditioning type, room size, and space function when selecting \"representative\" sensor locations. Typically, sampling every 30 min is deemed adequate for shared offices where an error margin of ±0.5°C is acceptable. For environments with stable indoor temperatures, less frequent sampling intervals suffice. A power regression model tailored for offices equipped with central AC and no operable windows was developed to predict the maximum allowable sampling interval based on several days of indoor temperature monitoring in winter. Regarding monitoring duration, the study advocates a preferred sampling period of one year to comprehensively capture seasonal variations. Alternatively, a minimum monitoring period of four to six months commencing in late spring or early summer is identified as potentially sufficient. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing long-term thermal monitoring practices in offices and may contribute to expanding the scope of thermal comfort standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term monitoring of the thermal environment in office buildings has become increasingly relevant with the rise of wireless sensor networks. However, there is a notable absence of explicit guidelines for implementing monitoring strategies in such contexts. This lack of direction can lead to inconsistent deployment of sensor networks, resulting in higher maintenance costs and inaccurate long-term assessments of thermal conditions. Based on data analyses of high-accuracy, high-frequency field measurements conducted over a year or longer across multiple offices in Sydney and Shanghai, this study proposes a strategy for long-term temperature monitoring. The strategy advises practitioners to prioritize considerations such as air-conditioning type, room size, and space function when selecting "representative" sensor locations. Typically, sampling every 30 min is deemed adequate for shared offices where an error margin of ±0.5°C is acceptable. For environments with stable indoor temperatures, less frequent sampling intervals suffice. A power regression model tailored for offices equipped with central AC and no operable windows was developed to predict the maximum allowable sampling interval based on several days of indoor temperature monitoring in winter. Regarding monitoring duration, the study advocates a preferred sampling period of one year to comprehensively capture seasonal variations. Alternatively, a minimum monitoring period of four to six months commencing in late spring or early summer is identified as potentially sufficient. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing long-term thermal monitoring practices in offices and may contribute to expanding the scope of thermal comfort standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化办公室长期温度监测的循证策略
随着无线传感器网络的兴起,对办公楼热环境的长期监测变得越来越重要。然而,在这种情况下实施监测策略显然缺乏明确的指导方针。这种缺乏指导的情况会导致传感器网络部署的不一致,从而造成维护成本的增加和热环境长期评估的不准确。本研究基于对悉尼和上海多个办事处进行的长达一年或更长时间的高精度、高频率实地测量数据分析,提出了长期温度监测策略。该策略建议从业人员在选择 "代表性 "传感器位置时,优先考虑空调类型、房间大小和空间功能等因素。通常情况下,对于共享办公室来说,每 30 分钟采样一次就足够了,误差范围在 ±0.5°C 之间是可以接受的。对于室内温度稳定的环境,采样间隔较短即可。根据冬季数天的室内温度监测结果,为配备中央空调且无可开启窗户的办公室量身定制了一个功率回归模型,以预测最大允许采样间隔。关于监测持续时间,该研究主张首选一年的采样期,以全面捕捉季节性变化。另外,从春末夏初开始的至少四到六个月的监测期也可能足够。这些研究结果为优化办公室长期热监测实践提供了宝贵的见解,并可能有助于扩大热舒适标准的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Ventilation characteristics in a hospital where a COVID-19 outbreak occurred in the winter of 2020” [Indoor Environ. 2 (2025) 100065] Implementing Bayesian inference on a stochastic CO2-based grey-box model CO2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in public schools: A retrospective cohort study in Montreal (Canada) Cognition, economic decision-making, and physiological response to carbon dioxide Personal air cleaning by a user-tracking robot equipped with a nanofiber air cleaner in a large work space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1