{"title":"Geopolitical risks and crude oil futures volatility: Evidence from machine learning","authors":"Hongwei Zhang , Wentao Wang , Zibo Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper conducts a dynamic analysis of the forecasting impact of categorical geopolitical risks on crude oil futures volatility, employing the Transformer-based neural network. Empirical results indicate geopolitical risk linked to war and terrorism consistently exerts the most significant impact across all forecast horizons. Our investigation further reveals that the impact of different subcategories of geopolitical risk on crude oil futures volatility exhibits noteworthy time-varying characteristics. Furthermore, the predictive impact of geopolitical risk on crude oil futures volatility exhibits asymmetry across distinct economic states. In short-term forecasts, the incremental predictive information derived from geopolitical risks primarily concentrated in the economic expansion, gradually transitioning towards economic recession as the forecast horizon extends. More importantly, our research emphasizes that the predictive information derived from geopolitical risks enhances the precision of crude oil futures volatility forecasts and delivers significant economic benefits to investors by integrating valuable information into their portfolio strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 105374"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper conducts a dynamic analysis of the forecasting impact of categorical geopolitical risks on crude oil futures volatility, employing the Transformer-based neural network. Empirical results indicate geopolitical risk linked to war and terrorism consistently exerts the most significant impact across all forecast horizons. Our investigation further reveals that the impact of different subcategories of geopolitical risk on crude oil futures volatility exhibits noteworthy time-varying characteristics. Furthermore, the predictive impact of geopolitical risk on crude oil futures volatility exhibits asymmetry across distinct economic states. In short-term forecasts, the incremental predictive information derived from geopolitical risks primarily concentrated in the economic expansion, gradually transitioning towards economic recession as the forecast horizon extends. More importantly, our research emphasizes that the predictive information derived from geopolitical risks enhances the precision of crude oil futures volatility forecasts and delivers significant economic benefits to investors by integrating valuable information into their portfolio strategies.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.