Mindfulness, crashes, and risky driving behaviors among adolescents and young adults in the United States

Johnathon P. Ehsani , Michelle Duren , Sjaan Koppel , Federico Vaca , Andrew Hellinger , Brydon Grant , Ahmed Sabit , Gayane Yenokyan
{"title":"Mindfulness, crashes, and risky driving behaviors among adolescents and young adults in the United States","authors":"Johnathon P. Ehsani ,&nbsp;Michelle Duren ,&nbsp;Sjaan Koppel ,&nbsp;Federico Vaca ,&nbsp;Andrew Hellinger ,&nbsp;Brydon Grant ,&nbsp;Ahmed Sabit ,&nbsp;Gayane Yenokyan","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to examine the association between individual-level mindfulness and a range of risky driving behaviors among U.S. adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a survey of a nationally representative sample of 16–19-year-olds, recruited from the National Opinion Research Center AmeriSpeak panel, a probability-based sample. Participants completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Risky driving measures were adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Spline regression analysis was performed to identify the threshold where mindfulness scores significantly changed driving behaviors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjusting for age, gender, and race, adolescents reporting higher mindfulness scores were significantly less likely to engage on all risky driving behaviors and significantly less likely to have been involved in a crash. Spline regression analysis indicated that a mindfulness score of 75 corresponded to the minimum marginal probability change averaged across the outcomes of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This paper describes a previously unknown association between mindfulness and risky driving in a vulnerable population which is at higher risk of injury and death from motor vehicle crashes. The strength of the associations across a range of behaviors suggests mindfulness could be a general protective factor for adolescents’ driving behaviors and suggests that mindfulness training may be a promising safety intervention for adolescents. A mindfulness score of 75 could be a potential target for mindfulness training interventions aiming to reduce risky driving behaviors and crashes among teenage drivers.</div><div>Abbreviations: ADHD, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; CI, Confidence Interval; MAAS, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; NORC, University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center; YRBS, Youth Risk Behavior Survey.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between individual-level mindfulness and a range of risky driving behaviors among U.S. adolescents.

Methods

We conducted a survey of a nationally representative sample of 16–19-year-olds, recruited from the National Opinion Research Center AmeriSpeak panel, a probability-based sample. Participants completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Risky driving measures were adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Spline regression analysis was performed to identify the threshold where mindfulness scores significantly changed driving behaviors.

Results

After adjusting for age, gender, and race, adolescents reporting higher mindfulness scores were significantly less likely to engage on all risky driving behaviors and significantly less likely to have been involved in a crash. Spline regression analysis indicated that a mindfulness score of 75 corresponded to the minimum marginal probability change averaged across the outcomes of interest.

Discussion

This paper describes a previously unknown association between mindfulness and risky driving in a vulnerable population which is at higher risk of injury and death from motor vehicle crashes. The strength of the associations across a range of behaviors suggests mindfulness could be a general protective factor for adolescents’ driving behaviors and suggests that mindfulness training may be a promising safety intervention for adolescents. A mindfulness score of 75 could be a potential target for mindfulness training interventions aiming to reduce risky driving behaviors and crashes among teenage drivers.
Abbreviations: ADHD, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; CI, Confidence Interval; MAAS, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; NORC, University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center; YRBS, Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国青少年和年轻成年人的正念、撞车和危险驾驶行为
研究目的:本研究旨在探讨美国青少年个人层面的正念与一系列危险驾驶行为之间的关系。方法:我们对具有全国代表性的 16-19 岁青少年样本进行了调查,这些样本是从美国国家舆论研究中心(National Opinion Research Center)的 "美国之音"(AmeriSpeak)小组(一个基于概率的样本)中招募的。参与者填写了 "正念注意力意识量表"。风险驾驶量表改编自青少年风险行为调查。结果在对年龄、性别和种族进行调整后,正念得分较高的青少年参与所有危险驾驶行为的可能性明显降低,发生车祸的可能性也明显降低。样条回归分析表明,正念分数为 75 分时,相关结果的平均边际概率变化最小。 讨论 本文描述了正念与危险驾驶之间的关系,这种关系以前在弱势群体中并不为人所知,他们因机动车碰撞事故而受伤和死亡的风险较高。一系列行为之间的关联强度表明,正念可能是青少年驾驶行为的一般保护因素,并表明正念训练可能是一种很有前途的青少年安全干预措施。正念得分75分可能是正念训练干预的潜在目标,旨在减少青少年驾驶员的危险驾驶行为和车祸:缩写:ADHD,注意力缺陷多动障碍;CI,置信区间;MAAS,正念注意力认知量表;NORC,芝加哥大学国家舆论研究中心;YRBS,青少年风险行为调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1