{"title":"In search of Cold War modernity's endpoints: Urban-nuclear entanglements and diachronic solidarity","authors":"Siarhei Liubimau","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article scrutinizes a Soviet nuclear industry's urban settlement from the perspective of this industry's endpoints. It approaches the nuclear industry's endpoints both in the register of city-enterprise relations and in the register of the spatio-temporal and institutional reality of the Cold War. The article's argument rests on empirical research of urban development after nuclear power in the town of Visaginas in Lithuania, a satellite of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (INPP). Today Visaginas is in the process of disentangling itself from the USSR's strategic Cold War exclusive nuclear industry network. I single out and reflect on three units of analysis of this disentanglement – biography, site, and schedule. By documenting the modes of spatiality and of temporality produced by urban-nuclear entanglements, I challenge the application of the notion of ‘de-industrialization’ to phasing out nuclear power plants. I show that nuclear technology has given rise to a type of industrial site and to Cold War modernity as a spatio-temporal and institutional reality, which have no intelligible endpoints. Despite the unintelligibility of Cold War modernity's endpoints, nuclear settlements serve as explorers of the institutional and infrastructural hyper- long-term, and therefore they nurture diachronic solidarity via a diachronic division of labor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105515"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007297","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article scrutinizes a Soviet nuclear industry's urban settlement from the perspective of this industry's endpoints. It approaches the nuclear industry's endpoints both in the register of city-enterprise relations and in the register of the spatio-temporal and institutional reality of the Cold War. The article's argument rests on empirical research of urban development after nuclear power in the town of Visaginas in Lithuania, a satellite of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (INPP). Today Visaginas is in the process of disentangling itself from the USSR's strategic Cold War exclusive nuclear industry network. I single out and reflect on three units of analysis of this disentanglement – biography, site, and schedule. By documenting the modes of spatiality and of temporality produced by urban-nuclear entanglements, I challenge the application of the notion of ‘de-industrialization’ to phasing out nuclear power plants. I show that nuclear technology has given rise to a type of industrial site and to Cold War modernity as a spatio-temporal and institutional reality, which have no intelligible endpoints. Despite the unintelligibility of Cold War modernity's endpoints, nuclear settlements serve as explorers of the institutional and infrastructural hyper- long-term, and therefore they nurture diachronic solidarity via a diachronic division of labor.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.