{"title":"Earth's precession rate evolution and rapid fall during the Late Proterozoic","authors":"David Waltham , Mattias Green","doi":"10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We consider the use of cyclostratigraphic estimates of ancient Earth-axis precession rates, <em>k</em>, as a proxy for ancient length of day and ancient Earth-Moon distance. Analysis of published estimates for <em>k</em> indicate a statistically robust acceleration in the rate at which <em>k</em> fell during the Late Proterozoic. We investigate whether this accelerated fall-rate can be reasonably explained by an increase in tidal drag, at that time, or whether alternate explanations are needed. A tidal drag explanation requires an unusually large and long-lived resonance in Earth's oceans. However, alternate explanations are even less viable. A rearrangement of Earth's internal structure can be ruled out by the excessive geothermal heat production this would have caused, whilst mass redistribution due to Late Proterozoic glaciation can also be ruled out as the <em>k</em>-history did not return to its former trend after glaciation ended. Disruption of the Earth-Moon-Sun system by a nearby passing star is similarly unable to account for the observations since the required disruption is much too large to have happened without additional, clearly observable effects. We also consider a possible impact from thermally driven, atmospheric tides but reject this explanation as it would decelerate the fall in precession rather than accelerate it. These conclusions required development of novel techniques for inverse modelling the <em>k</em>-history to directly give (i) tidal-drag and (ii) the potential energy liberated by internal mass distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11481,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","volume":"648 ","pages":"Article 119086"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24005181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We consider the use of cyclostratigraphic estimates of ancient Earth-axis precession rates, k, as a proxy for ancient length of day and ancient Earth-Moon distance. Analysis of published estimates for k indicate a statistically robust acceleration in the rate at which k fell during the Late Proterozoic. We investigate whether this accelerated fall-rate can be reasonably explained by an increase in tidal drag, at that time, or whether alternate explanations are needed. A tidal drag explanation requires an unusually large and long-lived resonance in Earth's oceans. However, alternate explanations are even less viable. A rearrangement of Earth's internal structure can be ruled out by the excessive geothermal heat production this would have caused, whilst mass redistribution due to Late Proterozoic glaciation can also be ruled out as the k-history did not return to its former trend after glaciation ended. Disruption of the Earth-Moon-Sun system by a nearby passing star is similarly unable to account for the observations since the required disruption is much too large to have happened without additional, clearly observable effects. We also consider a possible impact from thermally driven, atmospheric tides but reject this explanation as it would decelerate the fall in precession rather than accelerate it. These conclusions required development of novel techniques for inverse modelling the k-history to directly give (i) tidal-drag and (ii) the potential energy liberated by internal mass distribution.
我们考虑使用古地轴前向率(k)的循环地层学估算值来替代古昼长和古地月距离。对已发表的 k 估算值的分析表明,在晚新生代,k 的下降速率在统计学上出现了强劲的加速。我们研究了是否可以用当时潮汐阻力的增加来合理解释这种加速下降的速率,或者是否需要其他解释。潮汐阻力的解释需要地球海洋中存在异常巨大和持久的共振。然而,其他解释就更不可行了。地球内部结构的重新排列可以排除,因为这会导致过多的地热产生,而由于晚新生代冰川作用导致的质量重新分布也可以排除,因为冰川作用结束后,k-历史并没有恢复到以前的趋势。附近一颗流逝的恒星对地-月-日系统的扰动同样无法解释观测结果,因为所需的扰动太大,如果没有额外的、明显可观测到的影响,是不可能发生的。我们还考虑了由热驱动的大气潮汐可能造成的影响,但拒绝接受这种解释,因为它将减慢而不是加速前向下落。要得出这些结论,就需要发展新的技术,对 k 历史进行反建模,以直接给出 (i) 潮汐阻力和 (ii) 内部质量分布释放的势能。
期刊介绍:
Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) is a leading journal for researchers across the entire Earth and planetary sciences community. It publishes concise, exciting, high-impact articles ("Letters") of broad interest. Its focus is on physical and chemical processes, the evolution and general properties of the Earth and planets - from their deep interiors to their atmospheres. EPSL also includes a Frontiers section, featuring invited high-profile synthesis articles by leading experts on timely topics to bring cutting-edge research to the wider community.