EXPRESS: Sponsored Content as an Epistemic Market Object: How Platformization of Brand-Creator Partnerships Disrupts Valuation, Co-production, and the Relationship between Market Actors

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1177/00222429241296459
Zeynep Arsel, Maria Carolina Zanette, Carolina da Rocha Melo
{"title":"EXPRESS: Sponsored Content as an Epistemic Market Object: How Platformization of Brand-Creator Partnerships Disrupts Valuation, Co-production, and the Relationship between Market Actors","authors":"Zeynep Arsel, Maria Carolina Zanette, Carolina da Rocha Melo","doi":"10.1177/00222429241296459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sponsored content allows brands to partner with creators to reach creators’ audiences on digital platforms. However, both creators’ and brands’ incomplete understanding of this object generates two critical ambiguities: how to determine the value of sponsored content and how to effectively co-produce it. To better understand these ambiguities, we theorize sponsored content as an epistemic market object: an object that facilitates marketing functions but is only partially understood by the actors who use it . We analyze a data set of interviews, podcasts, media articles, and third-party platform reviews about—and by—content creators, brands, and intermediaries. Our findings show that brands, creators, and intermediaries create and apply knowledge to address valuation and co-production ambiguities. However, this knowledge work is incomplete, creating asymmetries in value outcomes and power relationships in a brand-creator partnership. Our paper contributes to marketing literature and practice by highlighting the role of epistemic market objects in transformative market disruptions that alter the roles of, and the relationships between, market actors. Our findings are transferable to other substantive areas such as Generative AI, Metaverse, NFTs, online news, and the sharing economy.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241296459","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sponsored content allows brands to partner with creators to reach creators’ audiences on digital platforms. However, both creators’ and brands’ incomplete understanding of this object generates two critical ambiguities: how to determine the value of sponsored content and how to effectively co-produce it. To better understand these ambiguities, we theorize sponsored content as an epistemic market object: an object that facilitates marketing functions but is only partially understood by the actors who use it . We analyze a data set of interviews, podcasts, media articles, and third-party platform reviews about—and by—content creators, brands, and intermediaries. Our findings show that brands, creators, and intermediaries create and apply knowledge to address valuation and co-production ambiguities. However, this knowledge work is incomplete, creating asymmetries in value outcomes and power relationships in a brand-creator partnership. Our paper contributes to marketing literature and practice by highlighting the role of epistemic market objects in transformative market disruptions that alter the roles of, and the relationships between, market actors. Our findings are transferable to other substantive areas such as Generative AI, Metaverse, NFTs, online news, and the sharing economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快递:作为认识论市场对象的赞助内容:品牌创造者合作的平台化如何扰乱估值、共同生产以及市场行为者之间的关系
赞助内容允许品牌与创作者合作,在数字平台上接触创作者的受众。然而,创作者和品牌对这一对象的不完全理解产生了两个关键的模糊之处:如何确定赞助内容的价值以及如何有效地共同制作赞助内容。为了更好地理解这些模糊之处,我们将赞助内容理论化为一种认识论市场客体:一种促进营销功能的客体,但使用它的行为者只对其有部分理解。我们分析了一组关于内容创作者、品牌和中介的访谈、播客、媒体文章和第三方平台评论数据。我们的研究结果表明,品牌、创作者和中间商创造并应用知识来解决估值和共同生产方面的模糊问题。然而,这种知识工作是不完整的,造成了品牌与创作者合作关系中价值结果和权力关系的不对称。我们的论文强调了认识论市场对象在变革性市场混乱中的作用,这种混乱改变了市场参与者的角色以及他们之间的关系,从而为市场文献和实践做出了贡献。我们的研究结果可应用于其他实质性领域,如生成式人工智能、元宇宙、NFTs、网络新闻和共享经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Do More “Likes” Lead to More Clicks? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Social Advertising EXPRESS: Cardio with Mr. Treadmill: How Anthropomorphizing the Means of Goal Pursuit Increases Motivation EXPRESS: The Impact of App Crashes on Consumer Engagement EXPRESS: Beyond the Pair: Media Archetypes and Complex Channel Synergies in Advertising EXPRESS: Conceptual Research: Multidisciplinary Insights for Marketing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1