EXPRESS: Beyond the Pair: Media Archetypes and Complex Channel Synergies in Advertising

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1177/00222429241302808
J. Jason Bell, Felipe Thomaz, Andrew T. Stephen
{"title":"EXPRESS: Beyond the Pair: Media Archetypes and Complex Channel Synergies in Advertising","authors":"J. Jason Bell, Felipe Thomaz, Andrew T. Stephen","doi":"10.1177/00222429241302808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research on advertising media mixes has mostly focused on single channels (e.g., television), pairwise cross-elasticities, or budget optimization within single campaigns. This is starkly detached from advertising practice where (i) there is an increasingly large number of media channels available to marketers, (ii) media plans employ complex combinations of channels, and (iii) marketers manage complementarities among many (i.e., more than pairs) channels. This research empirically learns complex channel complementaries using Latent Class analysis. Latent classes have three useful properties: (i) they account for non-random selection of channels into campaigns, (ii) they capture pairwise and higher-order interactions between channels, and (iii) they allow for meaningful interpretation. We empirically describe the most common media channel archetypes and estimate their relationship to the effectiveness of a set advertising campaigns on a set of common brand-related performance metrics. We use a dataset of 1,083 advertising campaigns from around the world run between 2008 and 2019. We find that there is not a systematically “best” media mix that correlates to dominant performance across all metrics, but clear patterns emerge given specific metrics. We find that traditional channels (TV, outdoor) are commonly paired with digital channels (Facebook, YouTube) in high-performing campaigns. We also find that current marketing practice appears far from optimal, and simple strategies have the potential to increase brand mindset metric lifts by 50% or more.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241302808","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research on advertising media mixes has mostly focused on single channels (e.g., television), pairwise cross-elasticities, or budget optimization within single campaigns. This is starkly detached from advertising practice where (i) there is an increasingly large number of media channels available to marketers, (ii) media plans employ complex combinations of channels, and (iii) marketers manage complementarities among many (i.e., more than pairs) channels. This research empirically learns complex channel complementaries using Latent Class analysis. Latent classes have three useful properties: (i) they account for non-random selection of channels into campaigns, (ii) they capture pairwise and higher-order interactions between channels, and (iii) they allow for meaningful interpretation. We empirically describe the most common media channel archetypes and estimate their relationship to the effectiveness of a set advertising campaigns on a set of common brand-related performance metrics. We use a dataset of 1,083 advertising campaigns from around the world run between 2008 and 2019. We find that there is not a systematically “best” media mix that correlates to dominant performance across all metrics, but clear patterns emerge given specific metrics. We find that traditional channels (TV, outdoor) are commonly paired with digital channels (Facebook, YouTube) in high-performing campaigns. We also find that current marketing practice appears far from optimal, and simple strategies have the potential to increase brand mindset metric lifts by 50% or more.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快讯超越配对:广告中的媒体原型和复杂渠道协同效应
以往对广告媒体组合的研究大多集中于单一渠道(如电视)、成对交叉弹性或单一广告活动中的预算优化。这与广告实践严重脱节,因为在广告实践中:(i) 营销人员可利用的媒体渠道数量越来越多;(ii) 媒体计划采用复杂的渠道组合;(iii) 营销人员管理多种(即不止一对)渠道之间的互补性。本研究利用潜类分析(Latent Class analysis)对复杂的渠道互补性进行实证学习。潜在类有三个有用的特性:(i) 它们考虑了渠道在营销活动中的非随机选择,(ii) 它们捕捉了渠道之间的成对和高阶互动,(iii) 它们允许有意义的解释。我们根据经验描述了最常见的媒体渠道原型,并根据一组常见的品牌相关绩效指标估算了它们与一组广告活动效果之间的关系。我们使用了 2008 年至 2019 年间全球 1083 个广告活动的数据集。我们发现,并不存在一个系统性的 "最佳 "媒体组合,它与所有指标的主导绩效相关联,但在特定指标上出现了清晰的模式。我们发现,传统渠道(电视、户外)与数字渠道(Facebook、YouTube)在高绩效营销活动中通常搭配使用。我们还发现,目前的营销实践似乎远未达到最佳状态,而简单的策略就有可能将品牌心智指标提升 50%,甚至更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Beyond the Pair: Media Archetypes and Complex Channel Synergies in Advertising EXPRESS: Conceptual Research: Multidisciplinary Insights for Marketing EXPRESS: Targeting Nearby Influencers: the Acceleration of Natural Triadic Closure by Leveraging Interconnectors EXPRESS: Collaborating to Innovate: Balancing Strategy Dividend and Transactional Efficiencies EXPRESS: “Statistical Significance” and Statistical Reporting: Moving Beyond Binary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1