Different degrees of summed difference perfusion score in women: influence on the prognostic variables associated with cardiac events.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921
Guillermo Romero-Farina, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Ignacio Ferreira-González
{"title":"Different degrees of summed difference perfusion score in women: influence on the prognostic variables associated with cardiac events.","authors":"Guillermo Romero-Farina, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Ignacio Ferreira-González","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the predictive models (PM) for a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) only in women with abnormal summed difference score (SDS ≥ 1), borderline myocardial ischemia (borderline-MIsch: SDS = 1), MIsch (SDS ≥ 2), mild-MIsch (SDS = 2-4), and moderate-severe MIsch (ms-MIsch: SDS ≥ 5).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2000 and January 2018, of 25 943 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT-MPI) for coronary risk stratification; 717 women (age 68.37 ± 3.4 years) with an abnormal SDS ≥ 1 were included. During the follow-up (mean 4 ± 2.9 years) post-gSPECT-MPI, MACE (unstable angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the global women cohort with abnormal SDS (n = 717), the PM was angina [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65, P = 0.016], diabetes (HR: 1.72, P = 0.004), beta-blockers (HR: 1.61, P = 0.009), pharmacological stress (HR: 1.74, P = 0.007), ↓ segment (ST) mm ≥ 1 (HR: 1.54, P = 0.039), and moderate-to-severe abnormal summed stress score (ms-SSS) (HR: 2.92, P = 0.001). In borderline-MIsch group (n = 208), the PM was previous myocardial infarction (HR: 3.8, P = 0.001), nitrates (HR: 2.13, P = 0.047), pharmacological stress (HR: 4.81, P < 0.001), and ↓ST mm ≥ 1 (HR: 3.07, P = 0.014). In MIsch group (n = 509), the PM model was ms-SSS (HR: 2.25, P = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.73, P = 0.011), angina (HR: 1.68, P = 0.029), beta-blockers (HR: 1.59, P = 0.026), and ms-MIsch (HR: 1.62, P = 0.044). In mild-MIsch group (n = 399), the PM was ms-SSS (HR: 2.55, P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 2.17, P = 0.004), angina (HR: 1.89, P = 0.037), and beta-blockers (HR: 2.01, P = 0.011). In ms-MIsch group (n = 110), the predictive variable for MACE was ms-SSS (HR: 2.27, P = 0.016). The ms-SSS significantly increases the prognostic value of the ms-MIsch (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with different degrees of abnormal SDS have different PMs of MACE. The ms-SSS stands out as the most significant predictive variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating the predictive models (PM) for a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) only in women with abnormal summed difference score (SDS ≥ 1), borderline myocardial ischemia (borderline-MIsch: SDS = 1), MIsch (SDS ≥ 2), mild-MIsch (SDS = 2-4), and moderate-severe MIsch (ms-MIsch: SDS ≥ 5).

Methods: Between January 2000 and January 2018, of 25 943 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT-MPI) for coronary risk stratification; 717 women (age 68.37 ± 3.4 years) with an abnormal SDS ≥ 1 were included. During the follow-up (mean 4 ± 2.9 years) post-gSPECT-MPI, MACE (unstable angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed.

Results: In the global women cohort with abnormal SDS (n = 717), the PM was angina [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65, P = 0.016], diabetes (HR: 1.72, P = 0.004), beta-blockers (HR: 1.61, P = 0.009), pharmacological stress (HR: 1.74, P = 0.007), ↓ segment (ST) mm ≥ 1 (HR: 1.54, P = 0.039), and moderate-to-severe abnormal summed stress score (ms-SSS) (HR: 2.92, P = 0.001). In borderline-MIsch group (n = 208), the PM was previous myocardial infarction (HR: 3.8, P = 0.001), nitrates (HR: 2.13, P = 0.047), pharmacological stress (HR: 4.81, P < 0.001), and ↓ST mm ≥ 1 (HR: 3.07, P = 0.014). In MIsch group (n = 509), the PM model was ms-SSS (HR: 2.25, P = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.73, P = 0.011), angina (HR: 1.68, P = 0.029), beta-blockers (HR: 1.59, P = 0.026), and ms-MIsch (HR: 1.62, P = 0.044). In mild-MIsch group (n = 399), the PM was ms-SSS (HR: 2.55, P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 2.17, P = 0.004), angina (HR: 1.89, P = 0.037), and beta-blockers (HR: 2.01, P = 0.011). In ms-MIsch group (n = 110), the predictive variable for MACE was ms-SSS (HR: 2.27, P = 0.016). The ms-SSS significantly increases the prognostic value of the ms-MIsch (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Women with different degrees of abnormal SDS have different PMs of MACE. The ms-SSS stands out as the most significant predictive variable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性不同程度的总和差异灌注评分:对与心脏事件相关的预后变量的影响。
目的评估仅对总和差异评分异常(SDS≥1)、边缘性心肌缺血(borderline-MIsch:SDS=1)、心肌缺血(MIsch:SDS≥2)、轻度心肌缺血(MIsch:SDS=2-4)和中重度心肌缺血(ms-MIsch:SDS≥5)女性的重大心脏不良事件(MACE)预测模型(PM):2000年1月至2018年1月期间,在25 943名接受门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像(gSPECT-MPI)进行冠状动脉风险分层的连续患者中,纳入了717名SDS异常≥1的女性(年龄68.37±3.4岁)。在 gSPECT-MPI 后的随访期间(平均 4 ± 2.9 年),对 MACE(不稳定型心绞痛、非致死性心肌梗死、冠状动脉血运重建、心源性死亡)进行了评估:在全球 SDS 异常的女性队列(n = 717)中,PM 为心绞痛[危险比(HR):1.65,P = 0.016]、糖尿病(HR:1.72,P = 0.004)、β-受体阻滞剂(HR:1.61,P = 0.009)、药物应激(HR:1.74,P = 0.007)、↓段(ST)mm ≥ 1(HR:1.54,P = 0.039)和中重度异常应激总分(ms-SSS)(HR:2.92,P = 0.001)。在边缘型心肌梗死组(n = 208)中,PM 为既往心肌梗死(HR:3.8,P = 0.001)、硝酸盐(HR:2.13,P = 0.047)、药物应激(HR:4.81,PSDS异常程度不同的女性的MACE PMs也不同。ms-SSS 是最重要的预测变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Correlation between 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and microvascular invasion before liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Evaluation of jaw pathologies of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw using a computer program to assess the bone scan index: comparison of standardized uptake values with bone SPECT/CT. Parametric imaging in salivary gland scintigraphy. Predicting invasiveness of ground-glass nodules in lung adenocarcinoma: based on preoperative 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography and high-resolution computed tomography. SeHCAT retention measurements may be compromised by traces of 177 Lu/ 177m Lu more than 90 days after 177 Lu-DOTATATE was administered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1