Structural model of intelligence beliefs, motivational beliefs, academic self-handicapping and academic adjustment in Chinese undergraduate students.

Abstract

Background: Academic adjustment is crucial for students' success and well-being, yet the factors influencing this process must be more adequately understood. Although prior research has explored the impact of Intelligence and motivational beliefs on academic outcomes, there is a need to clarify how these beliefs interact to influence academic adjustment. Specifically, the existing literature needs a comprehensive model that integrates intelligence beliefs, motivational beliefs, and academic self-efficacy and examines their combined effect on academic adjustment.

Objectives: This research aims to develop and analyze a model that explains the relationships among intelligence beliefs (fixed and growth mindsets), motivational beliefs (including self-efficacy and intrinsic value) and test anxiety in predicting academic adjustment. This study also seeks to investigate the mediating role of academic self-efficacy in these associations, providing a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms that contribute to students' academic adaptation.

Method: The research employed a correlational methodology, targeting male and female undergraduate students at Inner Mongolia Medical University during the 2021 academic year. The statistical population comprised students from various departments, and a convenience sampling approach was utilized. Data collection involved 384 participants who completed questionnaires, including the Academic Adjustment Questionnaire, Intelligence Beliefs Questionnaire, Motivational Beliefs Questionnaire, and Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.

Results: The findings revealed a favourable fit between the proposed model and the collected data. Furthermore, through a comprehensive direct and indirect effects analysis, it was evident that academic self-efficacy mediated the relationships among intelligence beliefs (both inherent and incremental), self-efficacy, intrinsic value, test anxiety, and academic adjustment. These results contribute to a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing academic adjustment among undergraduate students. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In conclusion, this research underscores the pivotal role of academic self-efficacy as a mediator in the nexus between intelligence beliefs (both inherent and incremental) and academic adjustment. The study advocates for heightened attention to these constructs in educational planning. It emphasizes the need for educational interventions that foster positive Intelligence and motivational beliefs and mitigate test anxiety to enhance academic self-efficacy and promote successful academic adjustment. The implications of these findings extend to educators, counsellors, and policymakers involved in shaping the educational experiences of undergraduate students.