Management of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Dutch health care institutes: a nation-wide survey.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.028
Marlies Mulder, Karuna E W Vendrik, Sophie A M van Kessel, Daan W Notermans, Annelot F Schoffelen, Jacky Flipse, Antoni P A Hendrickx, Wil van der Zwet, Caroline Schneeberger-van der Linden
{"title":"Management of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Dutch health care institutes: a nation-wide survey.","authors":"Marlies Mulder, Karuna E W Vendrik, Sophie A M van Kessel, Daan W Notermans, Annelot F Schoffelen, Jacky Flipse, Antoni P A Hendrickx, Wil van der Zwet, Caroline Schneeberger-van der Linden","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE<sub>fm</sub>) is an opportunistic pathogen, which can cause outbreaks in hospitals. In the Netherlands, several national guidelines and guidance documents on different aspects of VRE<sub>fm</sub>-management are available. Most available guidelines are written towards the hospital setting and only few on long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Moreover, not all aspects of VRE<sub>fm</sub>-management are covered, recommendations differ and the level of compliance to these guidelines is unknown. The aim of this study was to get insight into the routine VRE<sub>fm</sub>-policies in Dutch healthcare facilities with regard to screening, diagnostics and infection control measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Online questionnaires were sent to representatives of Dutch hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The questionnaire included questions regarding the definition of VRE, screening, diagnostics, patient isolation, cleaning procedures, VRE<sub>fm</sub>-clearance and VRE<sub>fm</sub>-outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 61 hospitals with a response rate of 84.1% and 57 LTCFs, mostly nursing homes. Most hospitals reported VRE-outbreaks in the previous decade, whereas only one LTCFs reported an outbreak. Of the hospitals, 87% perform VRE<sub>fm</sub>-screening versus 50% of the LTCFs. VRE-positive patients are isolated in 98% of hospitals and 83% of LTCFs. Protocols regarding how to unlabel VRE-positive patients are in place in 84% of the hospitals and in 51% of LTCFs. The details of these measures differ substantially between healthcare facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown that most hospitals and some LTCFs in the Netherlands have standard procedures for VRE<sub>fm</sub>-management to some level, although the comprehensiveness and details of the measures differ per hospital. More uniform policies would improve comparability of VRE<sub>fm</sub> data on a regional/national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) is an opportunistic pathogen, which can cause outbreaks in hospitals. In the Netherlands, several national guidelines and guidance documents on different aspects of VREfm-management are available. Most available guidelines are written towards the hospital setting and only few on long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Moreover, not all aspects of VREfm-management are covered, recommendations differ and the level of compliance to these guidelines is unknown. The aim of this study was to get insight into the routine VREfm-policies in Dutch healthcare facilities with regard to screening, diagnostics and infection control measures.

Materials and methods: Online questionnaires were sent to representatives of Dutch hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The questionnaire included questions regarding the definition of VRE, screening, diagnostics, patient isolation, cleaning procedures, VREfm-clearance and VREfm-outbreaks.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 61 hospitals with a response rate of 84.1% and 57 LTCFs, mostly nursing homes. Most hospitals reported VRE-outbreaks in the previous decade, whereas only one LTCFs reported an outbreak. Of the hospitals, 87% perform VREfm-screening versus 50% of the LTCFs. VRE-positive patients are isolated in 98% of hospitals and 83% of LTCFs. Protocols regarding how to unlabel VRE-positive patients are in place in 84% of the hospitals and in 51% of LTCFs. The details of these measures differ substantially between healthcare facilities.

Conclusion: This study has shown that most hospitals and some LTCFs in the Netherlands have standard procedures for VREfm-management to some level, although the comprehensiveness and details of the measures differ per hospital. More uniform policies would improve comparability of VREfm data on a regional/national level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰医疗机构对耐万古霉素肠球菌的管理:一项全国性调查。
背景:耐万古霉素粪肠球菌(VREfm)是一种机会性病原体,可在医院引起疾病暴发。荷兰针对 VREfm 管理的不同方面制定了多份国家指南和指导文件。大多数指南都是针对医院环境编写的,只有少数指南涉及长期护理机构(LTCF)。此外,这些指南并没有涵盖 VREfm 管理的所有方面,提出的建议也不尽相同,对这些指南的遵守程度也不得而知。本研究旨在了解荷兰医疗机构在筛查、诊断和感染控制措施方面的常规 VREfm 政策:向荷兰医院和长期护理机构(LTCF)的代表发送了在线调查问卷。调查问卷包括有关 VRE 的定义、筛查、诊断、患者隔离、清洁程序、VREfm 清除率和 VREfm 爆发的问题:61 家医院(回复率为 84.1%)和 57 家 LTCF(主要是疗养院)填写了调查问卷。大多数医院报告在过去十年中爆发过弧菌感染,而只有一家 LTCF 报告爆发过弧菌感染。在医院中,87% 的医院进行了 VREfm 筛查,而 50% 的 LTCFs 进行了 VREfm 筛查。98% 的医院和 83% 的 LTCF 隔离了 VRE 阳性患者。84% 的医院和 51% 的 LTCF 制定了关于如何取消对 VRE 阳性患者标记的协议。这些措施的细节在不同的医疗机构之间存在很大差异:这项研究表明,荷兰大多数医院和一些 LTCF 在某种程度上都有管理 VREfm 的标准程序,但每家医院的措施的全面性和细节各不相同。更加统一的政策将提高地区/国家层面上 VREfm 数据的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1