The cingulum: a central hotspot for the battle against chronic intractable pain?

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae368
Linda Kollenburg, Hisse Arnts, Alexander Green, Ido Strauss, Kris Vissers, Saman Vinke, Erkan Kurt
{"title":"The cingulum: a central hotspot for the battle against chronic intractable pain?","authors":"Linda Kollenburg, Hisse Arnts, Alexander Green, Ido Strauss, Kris Vissers, Saman Vinke, Erkan Kurt","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain causes a major burden on patient's lives, in part due to its profound socioeconomic impact. Despite the development of various pharmacological approaches and (minor) invasive treatments, a subset of patients remain refractory, hence why alternative targeted neurosurgical interventions like cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex should be considered in the last resort. Despite clinical evidence supporting the potential of these treatments in the management of chronic intractable pain, physicians remain reluctant on its clinical implementation. This can be partially attributed to the lack of clear overviews summarizing existent data. Hence, this article aims to evaluate the current status of cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex in the treatment of chronic intractable pain, to provide insight in whether these neurosurgical approaches and its target should be reconsidered in the current era. In the current study, a literature searches was performed using the PubMed database. Additional articles were searched manually through reviews or references cited within the articles. After exclusion, 24 and 5 articles remained included in the analysis of cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex, respectively. Results indicate that various surgical techniques have been described for cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. Cingulotomy is shown to be effective 51-53% and 43-64% of patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic pain at ≤6 months follow-up, and 82% (9/11) and 76% (90/118) at ≥ 12months follow-up, respectively. With regard to deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex, no data on neoplastic pain was reported, however, 59% (10/17) and 57% (8/14) of patients with non-neoplastic pain were considered responders at ≤ 6 months and ≥ 12months follow-up, respectively. The most reported adverse events include change in affect (>6.9%, >29/420) and confusion (>4.8%, >20/420) for cingulotomy, and infection (12.8%, 6/47), seizures (8.5%, 4/47) and decline in semantic fluency (6.4%, 3/47) for deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. It can be concluded that cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex are effective last resort strategies for patients with refractory non-neoplastic and neoplastic pain, especially in case of an affective emotional component. Future research should be performed on the cingulum as a neurosurgical target as it allows for further exploration of promising treatment options for chronic intractable pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"6 5","pages":"fcae368"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain causes a major burden on patient's lives, in part due to its profound socioeconomic impact. Despite the development of various pharmacological approaches and (minor) invasive treatments, a subset of patients remain refractory, hence why alternative targeted neurosurgical interventions like cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex should be considered in the last resort. Despite clinical evidence supporting the potential of these treatments in the management of chronic intractable pain, physicians remain reluctant on its clinical implementation. This can be partially attributed to the lack of clear overviews summarizing existent data. Hence, this article aims to evaluate the current status of cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex in the treatment of chronic intractable pain, to provide insight in whether these neurosurgical approaches and its target should be reconsidered in the current era. In the current study, a literature searches was performed using the PubMed database. Additional articles were searched manually through reviews or references cited within the articles. After exclusion, 24 and 5 articles remained included in the analysis of cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex, respectively. Results indicate that various surgical techniques have been described for cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. Cingulotomy is shown to be effective 51-53% and 43-64% of patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic pain at ≤6 months follow-up, and 82% (9/11) and 76% (90/118) at ≥ 12months follow-up, respectively. With regard to deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex, no data on neoplastic pain was reported, however, 59% (10/17) and 57% (8/14) of patients with non-neoplastic pain were considered responders at ≤ 6 months and ≥ 12months follow-up, respectively. The most reported adverse events include change in affect (>6.9%, >29/420) and confusion (>4.8%, >20/420) for cingulotomy, and infection (12.8%, 6/47), seizures (8.5%, 4/47) and decline in semantic fluency (6.4%, 3/47) for deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. It can be concluded that cingulotomy and deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex are effective last resort strategies for patients with refractory non-neoplastic and neoplastic pain, especially in case of an affective emotional component. Future research should be performed on the cingulum as a neurosurgical target as it allows for further exploration of promising treatment options for chronic intractable pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钟乳体:对抗慢性顽固性疼痛的中心热点?
慢性疼痛给患者的生活造成了沉重负担,部分原因在于其对社会经济的深远影响。尽管开发出了各种药物治疗方法和(轻微)侵入性治疗,但仍有一部分患者难以治愈,因此在万不得已的情况下,应考虑采用其他有针对性的神经外科干预措施,如扣带切除术和前扣带皮层深部脑刺激术。尽管有临床证据支持这些疗法在治疗慢性顽固性疼痛方面的潜力,但医生们仍然不愿意在临床上使用这些疗法。部分原因在于缺乏对现有数据进行总结的清晰概述。因此,本文旨在评估扣带回切开术和前扣带回皮层深部脑刺激术在治疗慢性顽固性疼痛方面的现状,以深入了解在当今时代是否应重新考虑这些神经外科方法及其目标。本研究使用 PubMed 数据库进行文献检索。此外,还通过综述或文章中引用的参考文献对其他文章进行了人工检索。经排除后,仍分别有 24 篇和 5 篇文章被纳入对扣带回切除术和前扣带回皮层深部脑刺激术的分析。研究结果表明,目前已有多种关于扣带回切开术和前扣带回皮层深部脑刺激术的手术技术。结果显示,在随访≤6个月的肿瘤性和非肿瘤性疼痛患者中,分别有51%-53%和43%-64%的患者接受了扣带回切开术;在随访≥12个月的患者中,分别有82%(9/11)和76%(90/118)的患者接受了扣带回切开术。关于前扣带回皮层的深部脑刺激,没有关于肿瘤性疼痛的数据报告,但在≤6个月和≥12个月的随访中,分别有59%(10/17)和57%(8/14)的非肿瘤性疼痛患者被认为是应答者。报告最多的不良事件包括:进行扣带回切开术的患者出现情感变化(>6.9%,>29/420)和意识模糊(>4.8%,>20/420);进行前扣带回皮层深部脑刺激术的患者出现感染(12.8%,6/47)、癫痫发作(8.5%,4/47)和语义流畅性下降(6.4%,3/47)。由此可以得出结论,对于难治性非肿瘤性和肿瘤性疼痛患者,尤其是有情感情绪成分的患者,扣带回切除术和前扣带回皮层深部脑刺激是有效的最后手段。今后应将扣带回作为神经外科的靶点进行研究,因为它可以进一步探索治疗慢性顽固性疼痛的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy impacts neurofibrillary tangle burden and cognition. Loss of tissue-type plasminogen activator causes multiple developmental anomalies. Differential functional change in olfactory bulb and olfactory eloquent areas in Parkinson's disease. Mapping sentence comprehension and syntactic complexity: evidence from 131 stroke survivors. Outcome prediction comparison of ischaemic areas' radiomics in acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1