Comparative study of LSTM and ANN models for power consumption prediction of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems in buildings

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.10.020
Po-Ching Hsu , Lei Gao , Yunho Hwang
{"title":"Comparative study of LSTM and ANN models for power consumption prediction of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems in buildings","authors":"Po-Ching Hsu ,&nbsp;Lei Gao ,&nbsp;Yunho Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The optimized control of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system requires an accurate time series forecast model for power consumption. Currently, physics-based and black-box models widely used for forecasting power consumption may not be able to capture the dynamic and non-linear behavior of such complex systems. This study presents a long-short-term memory (LSTM), deep learning-based model to accurately predict the power consumption of a VRF system with heat recovery units. The model training used one year of VRF system field test data. The feature selection through the Pearson correlation coefficient was implemented to improve the model's accuracy and computational efficiency. The sensitivity analysis of feature selection was performed by preparing three feature sets, including different levels of relationship with the predicted target. Additionally, the hyperparameters of the models were optimized by Bayesian optimization with the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator algorithm. The deep learning model, LSTM model, was compared to the baseline machine learning model, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and decision tree. The results show that LSTM-30feat with input time step 4 has the best testing performance of Coefficient of the Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CvRMSE) 23.3%. The best ANN model is ANN-10feat with input time step 8, which has a CvRMSE of 27.8% in testing and 13,569 trainable parameters. However, LSTM-10feat with input time step 4 has the CvRMSE of 24.8% in testing, and the trainable parameters are 1,809. A higher number of trainable parameters in models might result in increased memory usage on the computer and be computationally expensive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 55-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140700724003591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimized control of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system requires an accurate time series forecast model for power consumption. Currently, physics-based and black-box models widely used for forecasting power consumption may not be able to capture the dynamic and non-linear behavior of such complex systems. This study presents a long-short-term memory (LSTM), deep learning-based model to accurately predict the power consumption of a VRF system with heat recovery units. The model training used one year of VRF system field test data. The feature selection through the Pearson correlation coefficient was implemented to improve the model's accuracy and computational efficiency. The sensitivity analysis of feature selection was performed by preparing three feature sets, including different levels of relationship with the predicted target. Additionally, the hyperparameters of the models were optimized by Bayesian optimization with the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator algorithm. The deep learning model, LSTM model, was compared to the baseline machine learning model, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and decision tree. The results show that LSTM-30feat with input time step 4 has the best testing performance of Coefficient of the Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CvRMSE) 23.3%. The best ANN model is ANN-10feat with input time step 8, which has a CvRMSE of 27.8% in testing and 13,569 trainable parameters. However, LSTM-10feat with input time step 4 has the CvRMSE of 24.8% in testing, and the trainable parameters are 1,809. A higher number of trainable parameters in models might result in increased memory usage on the computer and be computationally expensive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于楼宇可变制冷剂流量(VRF)系统耗电量预测的 LSTM 和 ANN 模型比较研究
变制冷剂流量(VRF)系统的优化控制需要精确的耗电量时间序列预测模型。目前,广泛用于预测功耗的基于物理的黑盒模型可能无法捕捉此类复杂系统的动态和非线性行为。本研究提出了一种基于深度学习的长短期记忆(LSTM)模型,用于准确预测带有热回收装置的 VRF 系统的耗电量。模型训练使用了一年的 VRF 系统现场测试数据。通过皮尔逊相关系数进行特征选择,以提高模型的准确性和计算效率。通过准备三个特征集,包括与预测目标之间不同程度的关系,对特征选择进行了灵敏度分析。此外,还利用树状结构 Parzen Estimator 算法对模型的超参数进行了贝叶斯优化。深度学习模型 LSTM 模型与基准机器学习模型、人工神经网络(ANN)和决策树进行了比较。结果显示,输入时间步长为 4 的 LSTM-30feat 测试性能最佳,均方根误差变异系数(CvRMSE)为 23.3%。最佳 ANN 模型是输入时间步长为 8 的 ANN-10feat,其测试的 CvRMSE 为 27.8%,可训练参数为 13,569 个。然而,输入时间步长为 4 的 LSTM-10feat 在测试中的 CvRMSE 为 24.8%,可训练参数为 1 809 个。模型中可训练参数的数量越多,可能会导致计算机内存使用量增加,计算成本越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Refrigeration is published for the International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) by Elsevier. It is essential reading for all those wishing to keep abreast of research and industrial news in refrigeration, air conditioning and associated fields. This is particularly important in these times of rapid introduction of alternative refrigerants and the emergence of new technology. The journal has published special issues on alternative refrigerants and novel topics in the field of boiling, condensation, heat pumps, food refrigeration, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrocarbons, magnetic refrigeration at room temperature, sorptive cooling, phase change materials and slurries, ejector technology, compressors, and solar cooling. As well as original research papers the International Journal of Refrigeration also includes review articles, papers presented at IIR conferences, short reports and letters describing preliminary results and experimental details, and letters to the Editor on recent areas of discussion and controversy. Other features include forthcoming events, conference reports and book reviews. Papers are published in either English or French with the IIR news section in both languages.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Data-enhanced convolutional network based on air conditioning system start/stop time prediction Start-up investigation and heat transfer enhancement analysis of a loop thermosyphon with biomimetic honeycomb-channel evaporator Optimal Intermediate Pressure Investigation in a CO₂ Transcritical Distributed Compression Refrigeration Cycle Thermodynamic and technoeconomic limitations of Brayton refrigeration for air conditioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1