{"title":"Comparative study of LSTM and ANN models for power consumption prediction of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems in buildings","authors":"Po-Ching Hsu , Lei Gao , Yunho Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The optimized control of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system requires an accurate time series forecast model for power consumption. Currently, physics-based and black-box models widely used for forecasting power consumption may not be able to capture the dynamic and non-linear behavior of such complex systems. This study presents a long-short-term memory (LSTM), deep learning-based model to accurately predict the power consumption of a VRF system with heat recovery units. The model training used one year of VRF system field test data. The feature selection through the Pearson correlation coefficient was implemented to improve the model's accuracy and computational efficiency. The sensitivity analysis of feature selection was performed by preparing three feature sets, including different levels of relationship with the predicted target. Additionally, the hyperparameters of the models were optimized by Bayesian optimization with the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator algorithm. The deep learning model, LSTM model, was compared to the baseline machine learning model, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and decision tree. The results show that LSTM-30feat with input time step 4 has the best testing performance of Coefficient of the Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CvRMSE) 23.3%. The best ANN model is ANN-10feat with input time step 8, which has a CvRMSE of 27.8% in testing and 13,569 trainable parameters. However, LSTM-10feat with input time step 4 has the CvRMSE of 24.8% in testing, and the trainable parameters are 1,809. A higher number of trainable parameters in models might result in increased memory usage on the computer and be computationally expensive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 55-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140700724003591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The optimized control of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system requires an accurate time series forecast model for power consumption. Currently, physics-based and black-box models widely used for forecasting power consumption may not be able to capture the dynamic and non-linear behavior of such complex systems. This study presents a long-short-term memory (LSTM), deep learning-based model to accurately predict the power consumption of a VRF system with heat recovery units. The model training used one year of VRF system field test data. The feature selection through the Pearson correlation coefficient was implemented to improve the model's accuracy and computational efficiency. The sensitivity analysis of feature selection was performed by preparing three feature sets, including different levels of relationship with the predicted target. Additionally, the hyperparameters of the models were optimized by Bayesian optimization with the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator algorithm. The deep learning model, LSTM model, was compared to the baseline machine learning model, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and decision tree. The results show that LSTM-30feat with input time step 4 has the best testing performance of Coefficient of the Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CvRMSE) 23.3%. The best ANN model is ANN-10feat with input time step 8, which has a CvRMSE of 27.8% in testing and 13,569 trainable parameters. However, LSTM-10feat with input time step 4 has the CvRMSE of 24.8% in testing, and the trainable parameters are 1,809. A higher number of trainable parameters in models might result in increased memory usage on the computer and be computationally expensive.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Refrigeration is published for the International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) by Elsevier. It is essential reading for all those wishing to keep abreast of research and industrial news in refrigeration, air conditioning and associated fields. This is particularly important in these times of rapid introduction of alternative refrigerants and the emergence of new technology. The journal has published special issues on alternative refrigerants and novel topics in the field of boiling, condensation, heat pumps, food refrigeration, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrocarbons, magnetic refrigeration at room temperature, sorptive cooling, phase change materials and slurries, ejector technology, compressors, and solar cooling.
As well as original research papers the International Journal of Refrigeration also includes review articles, papers presented at IIR conferences, short reports and letters describing preliminary results and experimental details, and letters to the Editor on recent areas of discussion and controversy. Other features include forthcoming events, conference reports and book reviews.
Papers are published in either English or French with the IIR news section in both languages.