Prevalence of 'One and Done' Phenomenon in Adenoma Detection Within a Large Community-Based Healthcare System.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.055
Edward S Huang, Qiwen Huang, Pragati Kenkare, Satish Mudiganti, Meghan C Martinez, Su-Ying Liang
{"title":"Prevalence of 'One and Done' Phenomenon in Adenoma Detection Within a Large Community-Based Healthcare System.","authors":"Edward S Huang, Qiwen Huang, Pragati Kenkare, Satish Mudiganti, Meghan C Martinez, Su-Ying Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality metric in colonoscopy, reflecting the ability to detect adenomas. However, concerns remain regarding the robustness of ADR as a benchmark. In particular, \"one and done\" phenomenon may exists where physicians are less motivated to find additional adenoma following the first adenoma. To investigate this further, we aim to understand the relationship between single and multiple adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 89,587 screening colonoscopies performed by 32 endoscopists within the Sutter Health-Palo Alto Medical Foundation between 2015 and 2020. We analyzed ADR, single adenoma detection rate (ADR1), and multiple adenoma detection rate (ADR2+) using multivariate logistic regression and linear regression models. Endoscopists were then fit into 4 categories based on median ADR1 and ADR2+ (low ADR1, high ADR2+ [\"all or none\"], low ADR1, low ADR2+ [\"none and done\"], high ADR1, high ADR2+ [\"all and done\"], high ADR1, low ADR2+ [\"one and done\"].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall ADR was 45.4%. ADR, ADR1, and ADR2+ were significantly associated with similar factors including older age, male sex, higher body mass index, smoking status, high-risk colonoscopies, Medicare insured, use of mucosal assist devices, longer withdrawal times, adequate preparation, and procedures performed by female, high-volume endoscopists with a longer duration in practice. The median ADR1 and ADR2+ were 23.95% and 21.29%, respectively. ADR1 and ADR2+ were positively correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient (r), 0.701, p<0.001). Only 4 of 32 endoscopists fit our \"one and done\" category.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that ADR1 correlates with ADR2+. Despite concerns, the \"one and done\" phenomenon is not commonly seen in clinical practice. ADR remains a good surrogate marker for multiple adenoma detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality metric in colonoscopy, reflecting the ability to detect adenomas. However, concerns remain regarding the robustness of ADR as a benchmark. In particular, "one and done" phenomenon may exists where physicians are less motivated to find additional adenoma following the first adenoma. To investigate this further, we aim to understand the relationship between single and multiple adenoma detection.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 89,587 screening colonoscopies performed by 32 endoscopists within the Sutter Health-Palo Alto Medical Foundation between 2015 and 2020. We analyzed ADR, single adenoma detection rate (ADR1), and multiple adenoma detection rate (ADR2+) using multivariate logistic regression and linear regression models. Endoscopists were then fit into 4 categories based on median ADR1 and ADR2+ (low ADR1, high ADR2+ ["all or none"], low ADR1, low ADR2+ ["none and done"], high ADR1, high ADR2+ ["all and done"], high ADR1, low ADR2+ ["one and done"].

Results: The overall ADR was 45.4%. ADR, ADR1, and ADR2+ were significantly associated with similar factors including older age, male sex, higher body mass index, smoking status, high-risk colonoscopies, Medicare insured, use of mucosal assist devices, longer withdrawal times, adequate preparation, and procedures performed by female, high-volume endoscopists with a longer duration in practice. The median ADR1 and ADR2+ were 23.95% and 21.29%, respectively. ADR1 and ADR2+ were positively correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient (r), 0.701, p<0.001). Only 4 of 32 endoscopists fit our "one and done" category.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ADR1 correlates with ADR2+. Despite concerns, the "one and done" phenomenon is not commonly seen in clinical practice. ADR remains a good surrogate marker for multiple adenoma detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型社区医疗系统腺瘤检测中 "一劳永逸 "现象的普遍性。
背景和目的:腺瘤检出率(ADR)是结肠镜检查的一个关键质量指标,反映了腺瘤的检出能力。然而,人们对作为基准的 ADR 的稳健性仍然存在担忧。特别是,"一劳永逸 "现象可能存在,即医生在发现第一个腺瘤后发现其他腺瘤的积极性降低。为了进一步研究这一问题,我们旨在了解单个腺瘤和多个腺瘤检测之间的关系:我们利用苏特健康-帕洛阿尔托医疗基金会(Sutter Health-Palo Alto Medical Foundation)的 32 位内镜医师在 2015 年至 2020 年期间进行的 89,587 次筛查结肠镜检查的数据,开展了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用多变量逻辑回归和线性回归模型分析了 ADR、单个腺瘤检出率(ADR1)和多个腺瘤检出率(ADR2+)。然后根据ADR1和ADR2+的中位数将内镜医师分为4类(低ADR1、高ADR2+["全部或无"];低ADR1、低ADR2+["无且完成"];高ADR1、高ADR2+["全部且完成"];高ADR1、低ADR2+["一个且完成"]):总 ADR 为 45.4%。ADR、ADR1 和 ADR2+ 与类似因素显著相关,这些因素包括年龄较大、性别为男性、体重指数较高、吸烟状况、高风险结肠镜手术、医保参保、使用粘膜辅助装置、撤出时间较长、准备充分,以及由从业时间较长、工作量大的女性内镜医师实施手术。ADR1 和 ADR2+ 的中位数分别为 23.95% 和 21.29%。ADR1 和 ADR2+ 呈正相关(皮尔逊相关系数 (r),0.701,pConclusion):我们的研究结果表明,ADR1 与 ADR2+ 相关。尽管存在担忧,但 "一劳永逸 "的现象在临床实践中并不常见。ADR 仍是检测多发性腺瘤的良好替代标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1