Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.021
Edgard Medawar, Roupen Djinbachian, Douglas Rex, Michael Vieth, Heiko Pohl, Ioana Popescu Crainic, Mahsa Taghiakbari, Paola Marques, Daniel Kaufman, Felix Huang, Daniel von Renteln
{"title":"Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Edgard Medawar, Roupen Djinbachian, Douglas Rex, Michael Vieth, Heiko Pohl, Ioana Popescu Crainic, Mahsa Taghiakbari, Paola Marques, Daniel Kaufman, Felix Huang, Daniel von Renteln","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In the colorectum, intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), like high-grade dysplasia (HGD), should be resected endoscopically. We were interested to understand how real-world treatment of IMC cases compares to management of HGD and T1 colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter cohort study was conducted. Through pathology databases, all patients diagnosed between 2010-2019 with HGD, IMC or T1 CRC polyps at three hospitals in a regional Canadian center were identified. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgical management of IMC compared to HGD after complete endoscopic resection. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of synchronous advanced neoplasia (SAN) and the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for metachronous advanced neoplasia (MAN) in the three groups among patients eligible for follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 753 patients with IMC or HGD on a first pathology diagnosis, including 601 after complete endoscopic resection. Patients with IMC were more likely to undergo surgery after complete endoscopic resection compared to patients with HGD (10.5% [6/57] vs 0% [0/544], p<0.001). 455 patients had follow-up endoscopy and pathology (mean age 67.1y, 42.2% female, median follow-up 3.4y): 269 with HGD, 60 with IMC, 126 with T1 CRC. Proportions of SAN were 24.2%, 26.7% and 25.4% (p=0.908). Compared to HGD, patients with IMC and T1 CRC had similar MAN risks (aHR 0.82 [0.43-1.59] and aHR 1.16 [0.66-2.05], respectively). No lymph nodes were positive (0/363) and no metastasis occurred among patients with IMC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients diagnosed with colorectal IMC were more likely to undergo surgery after complete endoscopic resection than when HGD was diagnosed, although they were not at increased risk of SAN or MAN in this study and the known risk of nodal metastasis with colorectal IMC is small (0-2%). Unless a patient diagnosed with IMC is particularly concerned with this small risk, complete endoscopic resection should be considered definitive treatment for IMC and should not be followed by surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: In the colorectum, intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), like high-grade dysplasia (HGD), should be resected endoscopically. We were interested to understand how real-world treatment of IMC cases compares to management of HGD and T1 colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: A multicenter cohort study was conducted. Through pathology databases, all patients diagnosed between 2010-2019 with HGD, IMC or T1 CRC polyps at three hospitals in a regional Canadian center were identified. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgical management of IMC compared to HGD after complete endoscopic resection. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of synchronous advanced neoplasia (SAN) and the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for metachronous advanced neoplasia (MAN) in the three groups among patients eligible for follow-up.

Results: We identified 753 patients with IMC or HGD on a first pathology diagnosis, including 601 after complete endoscopic resection. Patients with IMC were more likely to undergo surgery after complete endoscopic resection compared to patients with HGD (10.5% [6/57] vs 0% [0/544], p<0.001). 455 patients had follow-up endoscopy and pathology (mean age 67.1y, 42.2% female, median follow-up 3.4y): 269 with HGD, 60 with IMC, 126 with T1 CRC. Proportions of SAN were 24.2%, 26.7% and 25.4% (p=0.908). Compared to HGD, patients with IMC and T1 CRC had similar MAN risks (aHR 0.82 [0.43-1.59] and aHR 1.16 [0.66-2.05], respectively). No lymph nodes were positive (0/363) and no metastasis occurred among patients with IMC.

Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with colorectal IMC were more likely to undergo surgery after complete endoscopic resection than when HGD was diagnosed, although they were not at increased risk of SAN or MAN in this study and the known risk of nodal metastasis with colorectal IMC is small (0-2%). Unless a patient diagnosed with IMC is particularly concerned with this small risk, complete endoscopic resection should be considered definitive treatment for IMC and should not be followed by surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠黏膜内癌患者的临床治疗与高级别增生异常和 T1 结直肠癌患者的临床治疗比较
背景和目的:在结直肠中,粘膜内癌(IMC)与高级别发育不良(HGD)一样,应在内镜下切除。我们有兴趣了解粘膜内癌病例的实际治疗与 HGD 和 T1 结直肠癌(CRC)的治疗相比有何不同:我们开展了一项多中心队列研究。通过病理数据库,确定了加拿大某地区中心的三家医院在 2010-2019 年间诊断出的所有 HGD、IMC 或 T1 CRC 息肉患者。主要结果是与HGD相比,IMC在完全内镜切除后的手术治疗比例。次要结果是三组符合随访条件的患者中同步晚期肿瘤(SAN)的比例和间变性晚期肿瘤(MAN)的调整危险比(aHR):我们确定了753名首次病理诊断为IMC或HGD的患者,其中包括601名完全内镜切除术后的患者。与 HGD 患者相比,IMC 患者更有可能在完全内镜切除后接受手术治疗(10.5% [6/57] vs 0% [0/544],pConclusions):与确诊为 HGD 的患者相比,确诊为结直肠 IMC 的患者更有可能在完全内镜切除术后接受手术,尽管在本研究中他们的 SAN 或 MAN 风险并没有增加,而且已知结直肠 IMC 的结节转移风险很小(0-2%)。除非确诊为 IMC 的患者特别在意这种小风险,否则完全内镜下切除术应被视为 IMC 的最终治疗方法,而不应在手术后进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1