Radiating for Two: Quantifying Radiation Exposure to Pregnant Urologists During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004309
Sikai Song, Akin S Amasyali, Daniel Jhang, Toby Clark, Kai Wen Cheng, Kyu Park, Nicole Mack, Cliff De Guzman, Ruby Kuang, Matthew Buell, Rose Leu, Kanha Shete, Ala'a Farkouh, Elizabeth A Baldwin, Evan Seibly, Zhamshid Okhunov, D Duane Baldwin
{"title":"Radiating for Two: Quantifying Radiation Exposure to Pregnant Urologists During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Sikai Song, Akin S Amasyali, Daniel Jhang, Toby Clark, Kai Wen Cheng, Kyu Park, Nicole Mack, Cliff De Guzman, Ruby Kuang, Matthew Buell, Rose Leu, Kanha Shete, Ala'a Farkouh, Elizabeth A Baldwin, Evan Seibly, Zhamshid Okhunov, D Duane Baldwin","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current occupational recommendations limit fetal radiation dose to 1 mSv. With increased gender diversity in urology, understanding radiation exposure during pregnancy is crucial. The purpose of this study was to determine surgeon uterine radiation dose during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and compare effectiveness of several radiation reduction strategies in a cadaver model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two cadavers were used to simulate the surgeon and the patient in a PCNL model. An ion chamber was placed behind the surgeon's anterior uterine wall to measure the radiation dose. Three radiation reduction methods were compared: pulsed fluoroscopy (1, 4, 8, 15, 30 pulses per second [pps]), low-dose (LD) fluoroscopy, and surgeon shielding (none, 0.35-, 0.50-, 0.70-mm lead equivalents). The average radiation dose per second was recorded for 20 trials per combination. Assuming 5 minutes of fluoroscopy per PCNL, the number of cases required to exceed the fetal occupational limit was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Decreasing pulse frequency from 30 to 1 pps reduced the dose by 96% (<i>P</i> < .001). The LD setting decreased the dose by 56% (<i>P</i> < .001). A 0.35-mm lead apron resulted in a 94% dose reduction (<i>P</i> < .001), and the 0.50- and 0.70-mm lead aprons further reduced the dose by 12% and 47%, respectively. In conventional fluoroscopy settings of automatic exposure control and at 30 pps, a surgeon could perform 12 PCNLs using no lead or 189 PCNLs using a 0.35-mm lead apron before reaching the 1-mSv limit. In addition to shielding, using 1 pps with LD fluoroscopy further decreased radiation exposure, allowing over 6000 cases to be performed with < 1 mSv uterine radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this cadaver study, these data support that high-volume pregnant surgeons using active radiation reduction techniques such as pulsed fluoroscopy, LD fluoroscopy, and appropriate shielding can maintain surgical volume with relatively low risk. Fetal dosimeter use with monthly monitoring is still encouraged to confirm safety throughout pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"370-377"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current occupational recommendations limit fetal radiation dose to 1 mSv. With increased gender diversity in urology, understanding radiation exposure during pregnancy is crucial. The purpose of this study was to determine surgeon uterine radiation dose during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and compare effectiveness of several radiation reduction strategies in a cadaver model.

Materials and methods: Two cadavers were used to simulate the surgeon and the patient in a PCNL model. An ion chamber was placed behind the surgeon's anterior uterine wall to measure the radiation dose. Three radiation reduction methods were compared: pulsed fluoroscopy (1, 4, 8, 15, 30 pulses per second [pps]), low-dose (LD) fluoroscopy, and surgeon shielding (none, 0.35-, 0.50-, 0.70-mm lead equivalents). The average radiation dose per second was recorded for 20 trials per combination. Assuming 5 minutes of fluoroscopy per PCNL, the number of cases required to exceed the fetal occupational limit was determined.

Results: Decreasing pulse frequency from 30 to 1 pps reduced the dose by 96% (P < .001). The LD setting decreased the dose by 56% (P < .001). A 0.35-mm lead apron resulted in a 94% dose reduction (P < .001), and the 0.50- and 0.70-mm lead aprons further reduced the dose by 12% and 47%, respectively. In conventional fluoroscopy settings of automatic exposure control and at 30 pps, a surgeon could perform 12 PCNLs using no lead or 189 PCNLs using a 0.35-mm lead apron before reaching the 1-mSv limit. In addition to shielding, using 1 pps with LD fluoroscopy further decreased radiation exposure, allowing over 6000 cases to be performed with < 1 mSv uterine radiation exposure.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this cadaver study, these data support that high-volume pregnant surgeons using active radiation reduction techniques such as pulsed fluoroscopy, LD fluoroscopy, and appropriate shielding can maintain surgical volume with relatively low risk. Fetal dosimeter use with monthly monitoring is still encouraged to confirm safety throughout pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双人辐射:量化怀孕泌尿科医生在经皮肾镜碎石术中的辐射暴露。
目的:目前的职业建议将胎儿的辐射剂量限制在 1 mSv。随着泌尿外科性别多样性的增加,了解孕期辐射暴露至关重要。本研究旨在确定外科医生在经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)中的子宫辐射剂量,并在尸体模型中比较几种减少辐射策略的效果:在 PCNL 模型中使用两具尸体模拟外科医生和患者。在外科医生的子宫前壁后方放置了一个离子室,以测量辐射剂量。比较了三种减少辐射的方法:脉冲透视(1、4、8、15、30 pps)、低剂量(LD)透视和外科医生屏蔽(无、0.35、0.50、0.70 mm 铅当量)。记录了每种组合 20 次试验的平均辐射剂量/秒。假设每次 PCNL 的透视时间为 5 分钟,则确定了超过胎儿职业限制所需的病例数:结果:将脉冲频率从 30 pps 降低到 1 pps 可使剂量减少 96%(p 结论:在这项尸体研究的局限性下,脉冲频率的降低可使剂量减少 96%:在这项尸体研究的限制条件下,这些数据支持大容量妊娠外科医生采用脉冲、低密度透视和适当屏蔽等主动减少辐射技术,可以在相对较低的风险下保持手术量。仍鼓励使用胎儿剂量计并每月进行监测,以确认整个孕期的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
期刊最新文献
Urologic Oncology: Bladder, Penis, and Urethral Cancer, and Basic Principles of Oncology. Long-Term Recurrence Risk, Metastatic Potential, and Length of Cystoscopic Surveillance of Low-Grade Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Radiating for Two: Quantifying Radiation Exposure to Pregnant Urologists During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Use and Disuse of Catheterizable Channels as the Primary Method of Emptying the Neuropathic Bladder: A Single Institutional Cohort Study. Clinical and Demographic Factors Linked to Low-Value Emergency Department Visits in Pediatric Patients With Spina Bifida.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1