Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study

{"title":"Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given the diverse roles and responsibilities expected of academic nurse educators, it is essential that they acquire relevant nursing educator competencies. Early career nursing faculty often struggle to engage in their tasks. Therefore, systematic support is crucial in developing the necessary capacities for early career nursing faculty. In organizational sociology, the positive interaction between organizational and individual resources enhances the competence of nurse educators. Psychological safety enhances organizational members' ability to cope with challenges and perform effectively. It may also foster a high sense of coherence, linked to improved job performance and competence in nursing faculty. Both psychological safety and coherence promote work engagement, further boosting nurse educator competence.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study explored the relationships between psychological safety, sense of coherence, work engagement, and competence of nurse educators among assistant professors and assistants in nursing education.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected from 164 early career nursing faculty using an anonymous self-administered web-based questionnaire. The study measured the psychological safety, sense of coherence, work engagement, and competence of academic nurse educators. The mediating effects of a sense of coherence and work engagement on the relationship between psychological safety and competency were assessed using the PROCESS macro model. Bootstrapping with 5,000 re-samples was used to determine the significance of the mediating effects.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The study was conducted from October 1 to December 31, 2022, at nursing universities in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Positive correlations were identified among psychological safety, sense of coherence, work engagement, and the competence of nurse educator. The sense of coherence and work engagement indirectly mediated the relationship between psychological safety and the competence of nurse educator. A serial multiple mediation model demonstrated that psychological safety indirectly influenced the competence of nurse educator through a sense of coherence and work engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Supportive organizational environments foster a sense of coherence, enabling effective resource utilization and the competence of nurse educator development. While structured intervention programs such as faculty development are vital, establishing supportive systems that nurture adaptable qualities and use various resources is also essential. A positive work environment can create a cycle of increasing competency through positive attitudes toward work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2400081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Given the diverse roles and responsibilities expected of academic nurse educators, it is essential that they acquire relevant nursing educator competencies. Early career nursing faculty often struggle to engage in their tasks. Therefore, systematic support is crucial in developing the necessary capacities for early career nursing faculty. In organizational sociology, the positive interaction between organizational and individual resources enhances the competence of nurse educators. Psychological safety enhances organizational members' ability to cope with challenges and perform effectively. It may also foster a high sense of coherence, linked to improved job performance and competence in nursing faculty. Both psychological safety and coherence promote work engagement, further boosting nurse educator competence.

Aim

This study explored the relationships between psychological safety, sense of coherence, work engagement, and competence of nurse educators among assistant professors and assistants in nursing education.

Design

A cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected from 164 early career nursing faculty using an anonymous self-administered web-based questionnaire. The study measured the psychological safety, sense of coherence, work engagement, and competence of academic nurse educators. The mediating effects of a sense of coherence and work engagement on the relationship between psychological safety and competency were assessed using the PROCESS macro model. Bootstrapping with 5,000 re-samples was used to determine the significance of the mediating effects.

Setting

The study was conducted from October 1 to December 31, 2022, at nursing universities in Japan.

Results

Positive correlations were identified among psychological safety, sense of coherence, work engagement, and the competence of nurse educator. The sense of coherence and work engagement indirectly mediated the relationship between psychological safety and the competence of nurse educator. A serial multiple mediation model demonstrated that psychological safety indirectly influenced the competence of nurse educator through a sense of coherence and work engagement.

Conclusions

Supportive organizational environments foster a sense of coherence, enabling effective resource utilization and the competence of nurse educator development. While structured intervention programs such as faculty development are vital, establishing supportive systems that nurture adaptable qualities and use various resources is also essential. A positive work environment can create a cycle of increasing competency through positive attitudes toward work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本早期职业护理教师在提高护士教育者能力方面的心理安全:横断面研究
背景鉴于学术护士教育者的角色和责任多种多样,他们必须掌握相关的护理教育者能力。初入职场的护理教师往往难以胜任工作。因此,系统性的支持对于培养早期护理教师的必要能力至关重要。在组织社会学中,组织资源与个人资源之间的良性互动可提高护理教育者的能力。心理安全能增强组织成员应对挑战和有效开展工作的能力。心理安全还能培养高度的一致性意识,这与提高护理教师的工作绩效和能力息息相关。本研究探讨了护理教育助理教授和助理护士的心理安全感、协调感、工作参与度和护士教育者能力之间的关系。研究采用横断面调查设计,通过匿名自填式网络问卷收集了 164 名早期职业护理教师的数据。研究测量了学术护士教育者的心理安全感、连贯感、工作投入度和能力。使用 PROCESS 宏模型评估了协调感和工作投入对心理安全和能力之间关系的中介效应。研究于 2022 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日在日本的护理大学进行。结果发现,心理安全感、连贯感、工作投入度和护士教育者的能力之间存在正相关。协调感和工作投入间接调节了心理安全与护士教育者能力之间的关系。连环多重中介模型表明,心理安全通过一致性和工作参与感间接影响了护士教育者的能力。师资发展等结构化干预计划固然重要,但建立培养适应性素质和利用各种资源的支持性系统也至关重要。积极的工作环境可以通过积极的工作态度创造一个能力提升的循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Nurse leaders’ recommendations for implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive practices in health systems: A qualitative descriptive study Nursing interventions in a newly established community health nursing system: A cross sectional survey Grit, academic resilience, and mindset of nursing students: A cross-sectional study Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study How can family members of patients in the intensive care unit be supported? A systematic review of qualitative reviews, meta-synthesis, and novel recommendations for nursing care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1